{"id":94014,"date":"2013-10-28T14:41:19","date_gmt":"2013-10-28T18:41:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/giveaway-and-review-astronomy-photographer-of-the-year-collection-two.php"},"modified":"2013-10-28T14:41:19","modified_gmt":"2013-10-28T18:41:19","slug":"giveaway-and-review-astronomy-photographer-of-the-year-collection-two","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/astronomy\/giveaway-and-review-astronomy-photographer-of-the-year-collection-two.php","title":{"rendered":"Giveaway and Review: Astronomy Photographer of the Year: Collection Two"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Want to stay on top of all the space news? Follow @universetoday    on Twitter  <\/p>\n<p>        Universe Today and Royal    Observatory Greenwich are pleased to offer one free copy of    Astronomy Photographer of the Year: Collection    Two!  <\/p>\n<p>    Universe Today Review by Dave Dehetre  <\/p>\n<p>    Astronomy Photographer of the Year is    a large format glossy book that covers the Royal Observatory,    Greenwichs annual astrophotography competition. It covers the    competition years from 2009 to 2012 and subject categories:    Earth and Space, Our Solar System, Deep Space, Young Astronomy    Photographer, People and Space, Best Newcomer, and Robotic    Scope. It also includes a brief how-to primer on    astrophotography which, while fine, seemed perfunctory and    tacked on.  <\/p>\n<p>    The book is organized by years and then by category, with nice    double page section breaks and clear detailed info alongside    each image. However, within each year, the categories arent    delineated, either through typographic means, such as headers    or section breaks, or through any indication alongside the    images themselves. Usually the category was obvious enough, but    it was somewhat confusing at times. Each category contains    images by the winner, runner-up, and sometimes one or more    highly-commended entrants. Some categories also had other    images without any designation of why they were included. This    could be a typographic omission of some sort, or it could be    that they were just additional entrants worthy of inclusion.  <\/p>\n<p>    I was happy to see the consistently high caliber of work that    came out of the competition. There isnt one image in the book    that was less than outstanding. Ive spent many a night far out    in the countryside doing astrophotography as a hobby, and Ive    never come up with an image to compare.  <\/p>\n<p>    I was also happy to see the competition segmented into subject    areas as well as the more expected age\/experience categories.    This seems to acknowledge that there are different metrics and    merit for the broad scope of styles\/subjects in    astrophotography.  <\/p>\n<p>    One other point worth mentioning is that I found that many of    the astrophotographers presented were people I was already    familiar with, some from Flickr, some from Youtube, and some    from periodicals like Sky at Night. I knew these people, and    not because they produce great images, but because they are    some of the people I learned astrophotography from. I think    this points out one of the great underlying aspects of    astrophotography: that it is collaborative in nature. And I    find it heartening that the people who share the most, who help    others and communicate, seem to be the ones who do the best    work and are the most successful.  <\/p>\n<p>    Im of two minds about Astronomy Photographer of    the Year though. On the one hand, its very well    done, beautiful, and stunning. Really everything you could ask    for in a book on this subject. But against it, in part it is    trying to document something (astrophotography) that is bigger    and richer than can be captured in a book.  <\/p>\n<p>    While the images are flawlessly presented, they lack the    backlit brilliance provided by a computer screen, and they    arent zoomable to view fine details. Many astrophotography    images are available on-line at resolutions equivalent to    wall-size if they were printed out.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original post: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/105843\/giveaway-and-review-astronomy-photographer-of-the-year-collection-two\/\" title=\"Giveaway and Review: Astronomy Photographer of the Year: Collection Two\">Giveaway and Review: Astronomy Photographer of the Year: Collection Two<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Want to stay on top of all the space news? Follow @universetoday on Twitter Universe Today and Royal Observatory Greenwich are pleased to offer one free copy of Astronomy Photographer of the Year: Collection Two! Universe Today Review by Dave Dehetre Astronomy Photographer of the Year is a large format glossy book that covers the Royal Observatory, Greenwichs annual astrophotography competition. It covers the competition years from 2009 to 2012 and subject categories: Earth and Space, Our Solar System, Deep Space, Young Astronomy Photographer, People and Space, Best Newcomer, and Robotic Scope.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/astronomy\/giveaway-and-review-astronomy-photographer-of-the-year-collection-two.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-94014","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-astronomy"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94014"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=94014"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94014\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=94014"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=94014"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=94014"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}