{"id":87682,"date":"2013-09-05T23:45:41","date_gmt":"2013-09-06T03:45:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/nasa-picks-four-possible-mars-landing-sites-none-of-them-interesting.php"},"modified":"2013-09-05T23:45:41","modified_gmt":"2013-09-06T03:45:41","slug":"nasa-picks-four-possible-mars-landing-sites-none-of-them-interesting","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/nasa\/nasa-picks-four-possible-mars-landing-sites-none-of-them-interesting.php","title":{"rendered":"NASA picks four possible Mars landing sites, none of them interesting"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>  NASA has whittled to four the number of potential landing sites  for its 2016 mission to Mars to four featureless plots, to ensure  a safe touchdown for its InSight lander, which will probe the Red  Planet's interior.<\/p>\n<p>    NASA has whittled to    four the number of potential landing sites for its 2016 mission    to Mars. All of the semifinalists, as the agency puts it, are    un-interesting, featureless plots.  <\/p>\n<p>          Subscribe Today to the Monitor        <\/p>\n<p>                    Click Here for your           FREE 30 DAYS of          The Christian Science Monitor          Weekly Digital Edition        <\/p>\n<p>    NASAs next mission to Mars is scheduled to land on the planet    in August 2016, six months after its launch from Earth. Called    the Interior Exploration Using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy    and Heat Transport lander  or, more succinctly, InSight  the    stationary lander will tuck into Marss    underground to investigate the Red Planets interior and    its formation some 4.6 billion years ago. Scientists hope that    plumbing beneath Marss surface will help in explaining the    processes that formed Earth, as well as the exoplanets popping    up in new portraits of the universe.  <\/p>\n<p>    Choosing a landing ground for InSight is much simpler than    choosing one for a Mars rover, said Matthew Golombek, a geologist    at NASAs Jet Propulsion    Laboratory. Rovers must be put down near the features    theyve been outfitted to research, which means that the crafts    have been deposited next to interesting plains or mountains.    But InSight is designed to research Marss interior, which,    conveniently, is accessible all over the planet, as long as the    surface is soft enough to penetrate.  <\/p>\n<p>    When you land a rover, its designed to measure certain    things, so you have to make sure those things are available,    says Dr. Golombek. Here, there are no real scientific    requirements. That makes the job dramatically easier.  <\/p>\n<p>    Still, there are some conditions that a plausible landing spot    must meet. The four landing-site candidates, selected from an    initial roster of 22 potential plots of real estate, are all in    Marss Elysium Planitia, an equatorial plain named for the    ancient Greeks heroic afterlife.  <\/p>\n<p>    That region, about 500 miles southward from Curiositys    touchdown spot, is near enough to the equator to protect    landers from the cold closer to the poles, as well as primed to    power the InSights solar array throughout the year. The region    is also low enough in elevation to have the requisite    atmosphere to decelerate the craft and, NASA hopes, land it    without incident.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Link: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.csmonitor.com\/Science\/2013\/0905\/NASA-picks-four-possible-Mars-landing-sites-none-of-them-interesting\" title=\"NASA picks four possible Mars landing sites, none of them interesting\">NASA picks four possible Mars landing sites, none of them interesting<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> NASA has whittled to four the number of potential landing sites for its 2016 mission to Mars to four featureless plots, to ensure a safe touchdown for its InSight lander, which will probe the Red Planet's interior. NASA has whittled to four the number of potential landing sites for its 2016 mission to Mars.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/nasa\/nasa-picks-four-possible-mars-landing-sites-none-of-them-interesting.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-87682","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nasa"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87682"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=87682"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87682\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=87682"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=87682"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=87682"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}