{"id":75658,"date":"2014-11-08T19:48:39","date_gmt":"2014-11-09T00:48:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.eugenesis.com\/review-the-theory-of-everything-my-left-brain\/"},"modified":"2014-11-08T19:48:39","modified_gmt":"2014-11-09T00:48:39","slug":"review-the-theory-of-everything-my-left-brain","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/agnosticism\/review-the-theory-of-everything-my-left-brain.php","title":{"rendered":"REVIEW: The Theory of Everything: My Left Brain"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>TIME Entertainment movies      REVIEW: The Theory of Everything: My Left Brain  Eddie  Redmayne as Stephen Hawking in a scene from \"The Theory of  Everything.\" (AP Photo\/Focus Features, Liam Daniel)  Liam DanielAP      In a weekend of science-fantasy, this story of Stephen Hawking    and his wife Jane is true science with a complicated heart    <\/p>\n<p>    At the movies, this is Science Friday. Christopher Nolans    Interstellar and the Disney animated feature Big    Hero 6 will battle for weekend box-office domination with    tales about scientists of the near future trying to save the    Earth by flying into wormholes and other astral phenomena. But    those films are the merest, or coolest, fantasies. In limited    release is The Theory of Everything, describing the    extraordinary life, cosmological breakthroughs and complicated    marriage of Stephen Hawking.  <\/p>\n<p>    The real Hawking is a ghostly presence in the Black Hole space    chase of Interstellar, whose science advisor and    executive producer Kip Thorne is a longtime Hawking colleague.    And the kids in Big Hero 6 are all students at San    Fransokyo Institute of Technology, a nod to Caltech, where    Thorne taught and Hawking was a visiting professor. The    Theory of Everything is not science fiction; it really has    very little science, since few viewers would sit as still as    Hawking for a lecture on relativity and quantum mechanics.    Instead, its a domestic drama that uses Hawkings peculiar    fame to provide a thoughtful, plangent example of the Oscar    Wannabe genre.  <\/p>\n<p>    To compete successfully for major Academy Awards, a movie    should be a true-life portrait of an exceptional man  sorry,    ladies  who struggles against impossible odds in a noble    quest. Its a narrow genre that studios ignore the rest of the    year in pursuit of fantasy-film box-office billions, but it    often pays off in statuettes for Best Picture (A Beautiful    Mind, The Kings Speech, Argo, 12    Years a Slave) and Best Actor (Sean Penn for    Milk, Colin Firth for The Kings Speech,    Daniel Day-Lewis for Lincoln, Matthew McConaughey for    Dallas Buyers Club).  <\/p>\n<p>    This month, just under the wire for the critics-groups prizes,    the Great Man Theory flourishes in two bio-pics about brilliant    Cambridge mathematicians with phenomenal achievements despite    physical or social impediments. In The Imitation Game,    Alan Turing (Benedict Cumberbatch) helps win World War II by    breaking Germanys Enigma code but suffers because he is gay at    a time when homosexual acts were illegal in Britain. That film    opens Nov. 28, and will earn awards galore for Cumberbatchs    exceptional performance. For now, heres The Theory of    Everything.  <\/p>\n<p>    Struck by motor neuron disease at 23 and given just two years    to live, Hawking (Eddie Redmayne) has survived and thrived for    another half century, due in large part to the loving care of    his wife Jane (Felicity Jones). Directed by James Marsh and    written by Anthony McCarten from Janes 2007 memoir, the film    both adheres to and gently upends the conventions of the Great    Man genre.  <\/p>\n<p>    For a movie about the author of A Brief History of    Time, this is a studiously chronological retelling of    Stephen and Janes 30-year marriage. Theory finds its    saving nuances in the story of a vigorous young man whose    disease turns him into his wifes invalid child. Bodily    degeneration is one scientific fact Stephen ignores with a    mulish cheerfulness, even as he takes for granted Janes    delaying of her own scholarly goals in order to tend and fend    for him. He can grasp the complexities of the cosmos more    easily than he can Janes need for upright male friendship with    her choirmaster Jonathan Hellyer Jones (Charlie Cox). And as    Stephens view of the universe evolves, so does his take on the    immutability of marriage. A pretty nurse (Maxine Peake) can    have that effect on a theory.  <\/p>\n<p>    Memoirs by ex-spouses tend to play up the grievance factor;    they are often a settling of scores  the other party might    have gotten the house, but the writer controls the story. Jane    Hawkings story might be boiled down to this: I gave up my    career to help my husband through his illness for decades. Then    he left me for his nurse. (He married Elaine; Jane married    Jonathan.) Jane, who was studying medieval Spanish poetry when    she met Stephen at Oxford, did eventually get her Ph.D.,    without being able to make productive use of her degree. It    hasnt led to a career, of course, she told The Guardian in 2004,    although I have done some sixth form teaching, and some    university teaching, and in a sense the frustration is greater    now than it ever was because I feel I have had a great deal to    offer but I have nowhere now to go.  <\/p>\n<p>    Given all this, the movie is almost spectacularly even-handed.    Renouncing the principles of melodrama, it describes a joining    of, and then a conflict between, Good and Good. Before their    marriage, when his disease has begun to debilitate Stephen,    Jane avers, Were going to fight this illness together. All of    us. Their arguments are more likely to be over able    agnosticism (his) vs. Christian belief (hers) than on the    heroic drudgery they both endure. If there is naivety, its    Stephens. When he says, Were just a normal family, she    needs to correct him: Were not a normal family. Shes right:    they were an extraordinary family.  <\/p>\n<p>    Marsh, who won an Oscar for his documentary Man on    Wire, overdoes the visual fireworks. To prepare viewers    for the horror of his subjects immobility, he shows Stephen    bicycle-riding, playing pinball, serving as cox on the    university rowing team. The camera is every bit as acrobatic:    it whirls, indulges in extreme soft-focus, distorts Stephens    vision through a wide-angle lens. By insisting that his movie    will move, dammit, Marsh gives the impression of not    trusting his material.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Continue reading here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/time.com\/3571245\/review-the-theory-of-everything\" title=\"REVIEW: The Theory of Everything: My Left Brain\">REVIEW: The Theory of Everything: My Left Brain<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> TIME Entertainment movies REVIEW: The Theory of Everything: My Left Brain Eddie Redmayne as Stephen Hawking in a scene from \"The Theory of Everything.\" (AP Photo\/Focus Features, Liam Daniel) Liam DanielAP In a weekend of science-fantasy, this story of Stephen Hawking and his wife Jane is true science with a complicated heart At the movies, this is Science Friday. Christopher Nolans Interstellar and the Disney animated feature Big Hero 6 will battle for weekend box-office domination with tales about scientists of the near future trying to save the Earth by flying into wormholes and other astral phenomena. But those films are the merest, or coolest, fantasies <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/agnosticism\/review-the-theory-of-everything-my-left-brain.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":57,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[577694],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-75658","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-agnosticism"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75658"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/57"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75658"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75658\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75658"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75658"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75658"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}