April 5, 2013|10:43 am <\/p>\n
But, instead of focusing on the panel's extremely important topic, the moderator, Students for Liberty Co-Founder Alexander McCobin, decided to use his time to advance his libertarian ideal of legalizing gay marriage. He was especially inflammatory when he kept comparing traditional marriage supporters to segregationists. At one point, frustrated that we weren't talking about the real issues, I blurted out, \"Is this the gay marriage panel?\" I felt, as did much of the audience judging by their applause of my interruption, that McCobin was abusing his position as moderator to steer the conversation in only one direction. <\/p>\n
CPAC has some serious explaining to do to its sponsors, the organizations that paid thousands to participate, for asking McCobin to moderate this panel. He has a history of being a pro-gay marriage, throw-conservatives-under-the-bus speaker and even led off his lengthy opening diatribe by announcing that he was not a conservative. This should not have been a surprise a simple Google search shows that McCobin has publicly advocated against the role social conservatives have played on the right and has even accused those of us with different beliefs to be \"intolerant.\" <\/p>\n
Over and over and over again during the panel, McCobin tried to make the point that conservatives must \"fall in line\" with libertarians and drop social issues because they are losers with generations X and Y. Yes, this generation has some libertarian tendencies, but not on everything, and certainly not on abortion. <\/p>\n
In fact, Gallup pollsprove that this is the pro-life generation, polling more pro-life than our parents. Modern technology has a lot to do with this fact we've seen our brothers and sisters in the womb during our moms' ultrasounds, we've Googled \"abortion\" and seen the ghastly results of the \"procedure,\" and we've seen what abortion has done to our friends and families first-hand. <\/p>\n
Abortion is an issue that libertarians seem to differ over, but I would argue that libertarians should be against abortion. <\/p>\n
Follow us <\/p>\n
The heart of libertarianism is liberty of the individual, especially an individual's right to not be harmed by the actions of another. One's right to life is central to this-without it, there can be no liberty at all. The fact that the state is actually sanctioning abortion, the destruction of an innocent individual, should make it even more egregious to libertarians. <\/p>\n
Human life begins at conception. That is an undeniable scientific fact. But in Roe v. Wade and its companion case Doe v. Bolton, which legalized abortion through all 9 months of pregnancy, the Supreme Court inserted itself as the final arbiter of what human life is and what it isn't. This government intrusion on the laws of nature and inherent inalienable rights is an injustice against the individual and an injustice against one is an injustice against all. <\/p>\n
With legal abortion, the state discriminates against citizens based on a policy that creates two tiers of human beings: a superior class with rights and an inferior class without rights, based upon physical location. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Read more: <\/p>\n
The Libertarian Case for Life<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" April 5, 2013|10:43 am But, instead of focusing on the panel's extremely important topic, the moderator, Students for Liberty Co-Founder Alexander McCobin, decided to use his time to advance his libertarian ideal of legalizing gay marriage. He was especially inflammatory when he kept comparing traditional marriage supporters to segregationists. Continue reading