{"id":75196,"date":"2013-03-29T23:43:13","date_gmt":"2013-03-30T03:43:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/americans-oppose-paying-for-storm-ravaged-beaches.php"},"modified":"2013-03-29T23:43:13","modified_gmt":"2013-03-30T03:43:13","slug":"americans-oppose-paying-for-storm-ravaged-beaches","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/beaches\/americans-oppose-paying-for-storm-ravaged-beaches.php","title":{"rendered":"Americans oppose paying for storm-ravaged beaches"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    WASHINGTON (AP)  More than 4 out of 5 Americans want to    prepare now for rising seas and stronger storms from climate    change, a new national survey says. But most are unwilling to    keep spending    money to restore and protect stricken beaches.  <\/p>\n<p>    The poll by Stanford University released    Thursday found that only 1 in 3 people favored the government    spending millions to construct big sea walls, replenish beaches    or pay people to leave the coast.  <\/p>\n<p>    This was the first time a large national poll looked at how    Americans feel about adapting to the changes brought on by    global    warming, said survey director Jon Krosnick, a professor of    political science and psychology at Stanford.  <\/p>\n<p>    The more indirect options the majority preferred were making    sure new buildings were stronger and reducing future coastal    development. New building codes rated the highest with 62    percent of those surveyed favoring it.  <\/p>\n<p>    Three in 5 people want those who are directly affected by    rising seas to pay for protection, rather than all taxpayers.  <\/p>\n<p>    Krosnick said the low favorability of sea walls and sand replenishment    \"reflect the public's fatalistic sense that it's more realistic    to just give up the beach than to try to save it when    other storms in the future will just wash it away again.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    The nationally representative survey of 1,174 Americans    conducted online by GfK Custom Research has a margin of error    of plus or minus 4.9 percentage points.  <\/p>\n<p>    University of Miami geology professor Harold Wanless, who    wasn't involved in the survey, said he was at a Miami Beach    meeting on Thursday with business and political leaders on how    to try to keep from losing their \"hugely expensive\" land. But    they are afraid of spending money in vain attempts that won't    work.  <\/p>\n<p>    There are three ways the public can deal with the effects of    rising seas on beaches, said coastal geology    professor S. Jeffress Williams of the University of Hawaii. He    is an expert on sea level rise and methods of adapting to it.    You can \"hold the line\" with expensive sea walls, retreat and    leave the beach, or compromise with sand dunes and beach replenishing.  <\/p>\n<p>    Sand dunes helped protect the New Jersey town of Seaside Park    more than its dune-less neighbor Seaside Heights when    Superstorm Sandy hit last fall, said Laurie Mcgilvray, a    government coastline science expert.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Link: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/americans-oppose-paying-storm-ravaged-beaches-223109477.html;_ylt=AwrNUPg.X1ZRpzUADQD_wgt.\" title=\"Americans oppose paying for storm-ravaged beaches\">Americans oppose paying for storm-ravaged beaches<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> WASHINGTON (AP) More than 4 out of 5 Americans want to prepare now for rising seas and stronger storms from climate change, a new national survey says. But most are unwilling to keep spending money to restore and protect stricken beaches. The poll by Stanford University released Thursday found that only 1 in 3 people favored the government spending millions to construct big sea walls, replenish beaches or pay people to leave the coast <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/beaches\/americans-oppose-paying-for-storm-ravaged-beaches.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[39],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-75196","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-beaches"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75196"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75196"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75196\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75196"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75196"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75196"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}