{"id":6234,"date":"2010-01-22T11:11:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-22T11:11:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/the-supreme-courts-ruling-on-campaign-finance-laws\/"},"modified":"2010-01-22T11:11:00","modified_gmt":"2010-01-22T11:11:00","slug":"the-supreme-courts-ruling-on-campaign-finance-laws","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/libertarianism\/the-supreme-courts-ruling-on-campaign-finance-laws.php","title":{"rendered":"The Supreme Court&#8217;s Ruling on Campaign Finance Laws"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p>Sweeping aside a century-old understanding and overruling two important precedents, a bitterly divided Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that the government may not ban political spending by corporations in candidate elections.<\/p><p>The ruling was a vindication, the majority said, of the First Amendment&rsquo;s most basic free speech principle &mdash; that the government has no business regulating political speech.<\/p><\/blockquote><p>&nbsp; <br>So, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/01\/22\/us\/politics\/22scotus.html?hp\">the Court's view<\/a> is that campaign finance regulation (at least the part addressed in yesterday's decision)&nbsp;is not constitutional. I am not a lawyer, but that view sounds right to me.&nbsp; Let's put aside the constitutional issue, however, and ask whether campaign finance regulation would be good policy if it were constitutional? <\/p><p>The standard argument for such regulation rests on four claims: <\/p><blockquote><p>1. that spending by politicians affects their likelihood of election; <\/p><p>2. that contributions to political campaigns affect the policies a politician supports; <\/p><p>3. that these influences on political outcomes are undesirable; <\/p><p>4. and that regulation successfully limits money&rsquo;s influence on these outcomes. <\/p><\/blockquote><p>Claims 1 and 2 are oft-overstated, but they probably have some validity.&nbsp; <\/p><p>Claim 3, however, is&nbsp;probably backwards.&nbsp;Money lines up on one side of an issue because a larger economic pie supports that side.&nbsp;Special interests do support bad policies, including corporate welfare, tariffs and quotas, agricultural subsidies, wasteful weapons programs, and pork pork-barrel spending, but money often causes better policies, not worse; free trade is an excellent example.<\/p><p>Claim 4 is even less convincing:&nbsp;politicians and special interests can circumvent most regulation.<\/p><p>So, campaign finance regulation's main goal is not compelling, and the regulation does not achieve that goal anyway.&nbsp; Instead, the regulation protects incumbents and rewards politicians who exploit loopholes in the law.&nbsp; The Court's decision is good economics, as well as good law.<\/p><div><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" src=\"http:\/\/euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-content\/plugins\/wp-o-matic\/cache\/65a65_6379328854053402400-7484079172824009861?l=jeffreymiron.blogspot.com\" alt=\"\" style=\"padding-left:10px; padding-right: 10px;\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sweeping aside a century-old understanding and overruling two important precedents, a bitterly divided Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that the government may not ban political spending by corporations in candidate elections.The ruling was a vindication, the majority said, of the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/libertarianism\/the-supreme-courts-ruling-on-campaign-finance-laws.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6234","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-libertarianism"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6234"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6234"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6234\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6234"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6234"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6234"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}