{"id":57310,"date":"2012-11-10T22:02:23","date_gmt":"2012-11-10T22:02:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/bone-marrow-stem-cell-therapy-does-not-improve-short-term-recovery-after-heart-attack.php"},"modified":"2012-11-10T22:02:23","modified_gmt":"2012-11-10T22:02:23","slug":"bone-marrow-stem-cell-therapy-does-not-improve-short-term-recovery-after-heart-attack","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/stem-cell-therapy\/bone-marrow-stem-cell-therapy-does-not-improve-short-term-recovery-after-heart-attack.php","title":{"rendered":"Bone marrow stem cell therapy does not improve short-term recovery after heart attack"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Washington, November 8 (ANI): Administering to patients stem    cells derived from their own bone marrow either three or seven    days after a heart attack is safe but does not    improve heart    function six months later, according to a clinical    trial.  <\/p>\n<p>    The results of the trial, called Transplantation In Myocardial    Infarction Evaluation (TIME), mirror a previous, related study,    LateTIME, which found that such cells (called autologous stem    cells) given two to three weeks after a heart attack did not    improve heart function.  <\/p>\n<p>    Both TIME and LateTIME were conducted by the Cardiovascular Cell Therapy    Research Network (CCTRN), sponsored by the NIH's    National Heart,    Lung, and Blood Institute.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"This study was extremely valuable even though it did not    provide a demonstrated health benefit after six months,\" said    Sonia Skarlatos, Ph.D., deputy director of NHLBI's Division of    Cardiovascular Sciences and member of the CCTRN.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Heart stem cell    therapy research is still in its infancy, and results    from early trials have varied greatly due to differences in the    numbers of stem    cells injected, the delivery methods used, and the    compositions of the study populations. With TIME and LateTIME,    we have established both safety and baseline results in two    large studies that followed the same procedures for growing and    then administering stem cells. This standard will inform the    next steps in research on the use of stem cells to repair    damaged hearts,\" she stated.  <\/p>\n<p>    Fellow CCTRN member Jay Travese, M.D., of the Minneapolis Heart    Institute added, \"With this baseline now set, we can    start to adjust some of the components of the protocol to grow    and administer stem cell to find cases where the procedure may    improve function.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    \"For example, this therapy may work better in different    population groups, or we might need to use new cell types or    new methods of delivery,\" he noted.  <\/p>\n<p>    Skarlatos said that another advantage of the TIME study is that    CCTRN is storing samples of the stem cells taken from the    participants. Investigators can examine the relationship    between people who showed significant improvement during the    study and the characteristics of their stem cells. Such a    comparison may offer insights on the cell traits that are    associated with clinical improvement.  <\/p>\n<p>    The findings will be presented at the American Heart    Association (AHA) 2012 Scientific Sessions in Los Angeles and    will appear concurrently in the Journal of the American Medical    Association. (ANI)  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Originally posted here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/in.news.yahoo.com\/bone-marrow-stem-cell-therapy-does-not-improve-091610940.html\" title=\"Bone marrow stem cell therapy does not improve short-term recovery after heart attack\">Bone marrow stem cell therapy does not improve short-term recovery after heart attack<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Washington, November 8 (ANI): Administering to patients stem cells derived from their own bone marrow either three or seven days after a heart attack is safe but does not improve heart function six months later, according to a clinical trial.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/stem-cell-therapy\/bone-marrow-stem-cell-therapy-does-not-improve-short-term-recovery-after-heart-attack.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-57310","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-stem-cell-therapy"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57310"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57310"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57310\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57310"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57310"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57310"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}