It looks like NASA is getting a little more creative with its landing systems. A team of researchers recently tested a new rotor landing system in the 550 foot fall Vehicle Assembly Building at NASA's Kennedy Space Center. The idea is for spinning blades to take the place of parachutes to enable soft and controlled landings on land instead of the ocean. <\/p>\n
The rotor reentry and landing system is designed for capsule-inspired spacecraft like the Orion Multipurpose Crew Vehicle that should fly before the end of the decade. It's an appealing system because it marries the stability and control of a helicopter to the simplicity of an unpowered system; wind passing over the rotors as the capsule descends through the atmosphere is enough to make the blades turn. And keeping the airflow around the blades' hinges balanced is enough to ensure the blades don't wrap around the spacecraft when they hit the wind. <\/p>\n
ANALYSIS: NASA's Amazing Gliding Gemini Capsules <\/p>\n
This landing system's process is called auto-rotation, and while it's been proven on helicopters it's never been tried on spacecraft. But that's not for lack of interest. <\/p>\n
In the mid-1960s, NASA engineers considered adding a rotor reentry landing system to the Apollo spacecraft. Seldom documented in popular histories since the possible landing method never gained much traction, the idea was for blades to spring up from the top of the Apollo command module during descent to provide lift. Then, the astronauts inside could control it like a helicopter to a soft land landing. They could touch down safely anywhere on Earth without relying of thousands of sailors for an ocean recovery. But like other proposed land landing systems, building and testing a new system when splashdowns worked wasn't worth the effort and was dropped. Now rotors are making a comeback. <\/p>\n
ANALYSIS: NASA's First Quest for a Reusable Rocket <\/p>\n
Right now, getting the blades deployed the right way is the challenge facing engineers. There are bombs that whose fins flick open at high speed, and engineers think a similar mechanism could deploy the blades and start them spinning almost immediately. At the same time, control fins on the side of the capsule would to keep it from revolving with the blades. <\/p>\n
Engineers are testing ways to get the rotors to start spinning with drop tests in the VAB. With the scale model capsule suspended 480 feet above the floor, engineers can use a helicopter radio-control unit to remotely changed the rotors' pitch and slow the capsules fall. <\/p>\n
Rotors could help recover spent rocket stages as well as spacecraft. The idea is to have rotors built into the booster frame and unfurled as the stage descends to Earth, the empty rocket just as controllable as a spacecraft for a soft landing. NASA considered this in the 1960s as well, but like the Apollo rotor reentry it never got further than the planning stages. <\/p>\n
ANALYSIS: Armstrong and Thompson's Flying Tricycle <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
See the article here: <\/p>\n
NASA's Next Capsule to Land Like a Helicopter?<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" It looks like NASA is getting a little more creative with its landing systems. Continue reading