{"id":55260,"date":"2012-11-02T06:53:02","date_gmt":"2012-11-02T06:53:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/1092-human-genomes-sequenced-to-determine-standard-range-of-human-genetic-variation.php"},"modified":"2012-11-02T06:53:02","modified_gmt":"2012-11-02T06:53:02","slug":"1092-human-genomes-sequenced-to-determine-standard-range-of-human-genetic-variation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/genetic-medicine\/1092-human-genomes-sequenced-to-determine-standard-range-of-human-genetic-variation.php","title":{"rendered":"1092 human genomes sequenced to determine standard range of human genetic variation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    ScienceDaily (Oct. 31, 2012)     Completing the second phase of the 1000 Genomes Project, a    multinational team of scientists reports that they have sampled    a total of 1092 individuals from 14 different populations and    sequenced their full genomes. The researchers described the    feat as a collegial effort to equip biologists and physicians    with information that can be used to understand the normal    range of human genetic variants so that a patient's disease    genome can be interpreted in a broader context.  <\/p>\n<p>    A report on the research, published online in Nature    on Nov. 1 represents the culmination of five years of work,    says Aravinda Chakravarti, Ph.D., professor of medicine and    pediatrics and a member of the Institute of Genetic Medicine at    the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. Chakravarti helped to    design the population genetics sampling plan.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"The DNA donors in the study were not known to have any    diseases, so the study gives us the genomic background we need    for understanding which genetic variations are 'within the    normal range,'\" Chakravarti says. \"With this tool, scientists    now have a standard with which they can compare the genome of    someone with diabetes, for example.\" That in turn, Chakravarti    says, will increase opportunities for understanding the disease    and creating targeted, individualized treatment.  <\/p>\n<p>    The selection of the 14 populations sampled was based on their    ancient migratory history and their genetic relationship to the    other populations studied. Within each population, healthy,    unrelated donors were randomly chosen for blood draws. The    blood samples were first transformed into cell lines that can    be stored and grown indefinitely so that they will always be    available for future studies. After cell lines were grown, the    DNA was sequenced and added to a public database.  <\/p>\n<p>    The first human genome to be sequenced, published in 2003, made    clear that as much as 98.5 percent of human genetic material    does not encode proteins, as had been thought. Scientists now    know the role of some of the non-protein-coding regions and,    although much of the genome remains a mystery, there is reason    to suspect that at least some of it plays a part in the    variability seen in disease susceptibility and prevalence.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"The 1000 Genomes Project started at the beginning, with the    whole genome and with no bias in the search for disease-related    variants toward protein-coding genes,\" Chakravarti explains.    \"Regulatory sequences and sequences we still don't understand    were also catalogued, so this information widens the areas of    the genome we can search when looking for disease-causing    variants.\" Most of the genetics research done to date has begun    with a disease or a protein that is known to be malfunctioning,    followed by a hunt for the responsible genetic variants.  <\/p>\n<p>    The genetic variations found in the populations analyzed were    categorized by how frequently they appeared in the individuals    tested. Variants seen in more than five percent of the samples    were classified as common variants, while low-frequency    variants appeared in 0.5 to five percent of individuals and    rare variants in less than 0.5 percent of the samples.  <\/p>\n<p>    The 14 populations sampled were divided into four ancestry    groups: European, African, East Asian and American. As    expected, most of the common variants had already been    identified in previous studies, and their frequencies varied    little between ancestry groups.  <\/p>\n<p>    By contrast, 58 percent of the low-frequency variants and 87    percent of the rare variants were described for the first time    in this study. Rare variants were sometimes twice as likely to    be found within a particular population as in that population's    broader ancestry group. Different populations also showed    different numbers of rare variants, with the Spanish, Finnish    and African-American populations carrying the greatest number    of them.  <\/p>\n<p>    Amazingly, Chakravarti says, the researchers found that among    rare variants, the healthy people in their study possessed as    many as 130 to 400 protein-altering variants; 10 to 20 variants    that destroy the function of the proteins they encode; two to    five variants that damage protein function; and one or two    variants associated with cancer. The implication is that all    healthy people everywhere carry similar numbers of rare,    deleterious variants.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>See original here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2012\/10\/121031141719.htm\" title=\"1092 human genomes sequenced to determine standard range of human genetic variation\">1092 human genomes sequenced to determine standard range of human genetic variation<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> ScienceDaily (Oct. 31, 2012) Completing the second phase of the 1000 Genomes Project, a multinational team of scientists reports that they have sampled a total of 1092 individuals from 14 different populations and sequenced their full genomes <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/genetic-medicine\/1092-human-genomes-sequenced-to-determine-standard-range-of-human-genetic-variation.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-55260","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-genetic-medicine"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55260"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=55260"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55260\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=55260"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=55260"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=55260"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}