Public release date: 31-Oct-2012 [ | E-mail | Share ] <\/p>\n
Contact: Vicki Cohn vcohn@liebertpub.com<\/a> 914-740-2100 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.\/Genetic Engineering News<\/p>\n New Rochelle, NY, October 31, 2012In a paper published today by Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, a peer-reviewed journal from Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers, researchers found that New York Times readers who were led to believe the newspaper's paywall was motivated by financial need were generally supportive and willing to pay, while those who believed it was motivated by profit were generally unsupportive and unwilling to pay. The article \"Paying for What Was Free: Lessons from the New York Times Paywall,\" written by Jonathan Cook, Associate Research Scientist in the Department of Psychology at Columbia University, and Shahzeen Attari, Assistant Professor in the School of Public and Environmental Affairs (SPEA) at Indiana University-Bloomington is available free on the Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking website. <\/p>\n An online survey conducted shortly before the newspaper introduced its paywall found that most readers planned not to pay for access. The same people were surveyed 10 weeks later and the researchers randomly assigned half to read a justification for the paywall based on financial need and half to read a justification for the paywall based on profit motive. They found that most readers did not pay for content. Readers devalued the newspaper, visited its website less frequently, and used loopholes to read New York Times content. However, the researchers also found that readers' attitudes and behavior could be changed by providing a compelling justification that emphasizes fairness. Those readers who were given the justification for the paywall based on financial need said they were more likely to pay for New York Times content. <\/p>\n ### <\/p>\n About the Journal <\/p>\n Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking is a peer-reviewed journal published monthly online that explores the psychological and social issues surrounding the Internet and interactive technologies. Complete tables of content and a sample issue may be viewed on the Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking website. <\/p>\n About the Publisher <\/p>\n Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers is a privately held, fully integrated media company known for establishing authoritative peer-reviewed journals in many promising areas of science and biomedical research, including Games for Health Journal, Telemedicine and e-Health, and Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology. Its biotechnology trade magazine, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News (GEN), was the first in its field and is today the industry's most widely read publication worldwide. A complete list of the firm's 70 journals, books, and newsmagazines is available on the Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers website. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n Excerpt from:<\/p>\n For New York Times readers, fairness matters when it comes to paying for content<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Public release date: 31-Oct-2012 [ | E-mail | Share ] Contact: Vicki Cohn vcohn@liebertpub.com<\/a> 914-740-2100 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.\/Genetic Engineering News New Rochelle, NY, October 31, 2012In a paper published today by Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, a peer-reviewed journal from Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers, researchers found that New York Times readers who were led to believe the newspaper's paywall was motivated by financial need were generally supportive and willing to pay, while those who believed it was motivated by profit were generally unsupportive and unwilling to pay. Continue reading