LOS ANGELES (AP) -- Calories. Nutrients. Serving size. How about \"produced with genetic engineering?\" <\/p>\n
California voters will soon decide whether to require certain raw and processed foods to carry such a label. <\/p>\n
In a closely watched test of consumers' appetite for genetically modified foods, the special label is being pushed by organic farmers and advocates who are concerned about what people eat even though the federal government and many scientists contend such foods are safe. <\/p>\n
More than just food packaging is at stake. The outcome could reverberate through American agriculture, which has long tinkered with the genes of plants to reduce disease, ward off insects and boost the food supply. <\/p>\n
International food and chemical conglomerates, including Monsanto Co. and DuPont Co., have contributed about $35 million to defeat Proposition 37 on the November ballot. It also would ban labeling or advertising genetically altered food as \"natural.\" Its supporters have raised just about one-tenth of that amount. <\/p>\n
If voters approve the initiative, California would become the first state to require disclosure of a broad range of foods containing genetically modified organisms, or GMOs. Food makers would have to add a label or reformulate their products to avoid it. Supermarkets would be charged with making sure their shelves are stocked with correctly labeled items. <\/p>\n
Genetically altered plants grown from seeds engineered in the laboratory have been a mainstay for <\/p>\n
Proponents say explicit labeling gives consumers information about how a product is made and allows them to decide whether to choose foods with genetically modified ingredients. <\/p>\n
\"They're fed up. They want to know what's in their food,\" said Stacy Malkan, spokeswoman for the California Right to Know campaign. <\/p>\n
Agribusiness, farmers and retailers oppose the initiative, claiming it would lead to higher grocery bills and leave the state open to frivolous lawsuits. Kathy Fairbanks, spokeswoman for the No on 37 campaign, said labels would be interpreted as a warning and confuse shoppers. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
See original here: <\/p>\n
California initiative will test appetite for genetically modified foods<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" LOS ANGELES (AP) -- Calories. Nutrients Continue reading