AUG 15 Media practitioners are well aware that there is no government that does not wish to suppress freedom of the press and freedom of speech in the world. And there is no political party that does not wish to manipulate the media and public opinion. <\/p>\n
You might have heard this clich a thousand times over, but I still have to mention it here. That is, there is no absolute freedom in the world, but only relative freedom. <\/p>\n
If you understand the above-mentioned reality, you will then find it not difficult to understand why governments around the world always introduce laws to restrict freedom of the press and freedom of speech. <\/p>\n
Originally, the formulation and adoption of any statutes in democratic countries should consider the following points: <\/p>\n
1. Is it necessary? <\/p>\n
2. Is it reasonable? <\/p>\n
3. Is it urgent? <\/p>\n
4. Have adequate consultation, discussion and debate sessions been conducted? <\/p>\n
The answers are not absolute for the same questions. <\/p>\n
It depends on your viewpoint and what stand you take. Take Section 114A of the Evidence Act for example; it is definitely necessary, urgent and reasonable in the eyes of the ruling coalition. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Read the rest here: <\/p>\n
Rights and freedom \u2014 Lim Mun Fah<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" AUG 15 Media practitioners are well aware that there is no government that does not wish to suppress freedom of the press and freedom of speech in the world. And there is no political party that does not wish to manipulate the media and public opinion. You might have heard this clich a thousand times over, but I still have to mention it here Continue reading