{"id":47886,"date":"2012-06-21T01:25:31","date_gmt":"2012-06-21T01:25:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/paper-blog-heats-up-ge-discussion.php"},"modified":"2012-06-21T01:25:31","modified_gmt":"2012-06-21T01:25:31","slug":"paper-blog-heats-up-ge-discussion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/genetic-engineering\/paper-blog-heats-up-ge-discussion.php","title":{"rendered":"Paper, Blog Heats Up GE Discussion"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      There's an interesting exchange on genetic engineering at the      Food Politics blog, <a href=\"http:\/\/tinyurl.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/tinyurl.com\/<\/a>, featuring a review      by industry critic Marion Nestle of an anti-GE paper, GMO      Myths and Truths. I've skimmed the paper, which you can find      at <a href=\"http:\/\/tinyurl.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/tinyurl.com\/<\/a>, and I confess to lacking      the expertise to evaluate the claims. It would take more time      than I have at the moment to dig into the claims, although I      hope to do so in the future.    <\/p>\n<p>      Nestle says the authors of the paper, who find nothing to      like in genetic engineering, \"have put a great deal of time      and effort into reviewing the evidence for the claims. This      is the best-researched and most comprehensive review I've      seen of the criticisms of GM foods.\" She asks whether the pro      camp can \"produce something equally well researched,      comprehensive, and compelling?\" and concludes, \"I doubt it      but I'd like to see them try.\" She says there's enough      evidence in the paper to justify labeling, at the very least.    <\/p>\n<p>      It is, of course, the position you'd expect her to take, and      several of the comments following her post challenge both her      and the paper. One claims there are indeed well-researched,      comprehensive and compelling pro papers. Others say the paper      she cites cherry-picks evidence and relies on papers that      have been debunked. An example cited in one of these critical      comments asserts that it relies on a study of Bt found in      human blood that used a test that couldn't detect blood at      the levels the study's authors said they found.    <\/p>\n<p>      My suspicion is most won't read these papers and will      continue to think what they already think about the issue. An      even worse fear is that reading the papers on both sides      wouldn't convert anyone on either side. Still, I may give it      a try at some point.    <\/p>\n<p>      Follow me on Twitter: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.Twitter.comurbanize\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.Twitter.comurbanize<\/a>    <\/p>\n<p>       Copyright 2012 DTN\/The Progressive Farmer, A Telvent Brand.      All rights reserved.    <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Originally posted here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dtnprogressivefarmer.com\/dtnag\/view\/blog\/getBlog.do?blogHandle=editorsnotebook&amp;blogEntryId=8a82c0bc37ec102e013809b7e8140129\" title=\"Paper, Blog Heats Up GE Discussion\">Paper, Blog Heats Up GE Discussion<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> There's an interesting exchange on genetic engineering at the Food Politics blog, <a href=\"http:\/\/tinyurl.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/tinyurl.com\/<\/a>, featuring a review by industry critic Marion Nestle of an anti-GE paper, GMO Myths and Truths. I've skimmed the paper, which you can find at <a href=\"http:\/\/tinyurl.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/tinyurl.com\/<\/a>, and I confess to lacking the expertise to evaluate the claims.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/genetic-engineering\/paper-blog-heats-up-ge-discussion.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-47886","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-genetic-engineering"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47886"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47886"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47886\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47886"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47886"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47886"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}