WASHINGTONCongressional Republicans intend to seek quick repeal of any parts of the health care law that survive a widely anticipated Supreme Court ruling, but don't plan to push replacement measures until after the fall elections or perhaps 2013. <\/p>\n
Instead, GOP lawmakers cite recent announcements that some insurance companies will retain a few of the law's higher-profile provisions as evidence that quick legislative action is not essential. Those are steps that officials say Republicans quietly urged in private conversations with the industry. <\/p>\n
Once the Supreme Court issues a ruling, \"the goal is to repeal anything that is left standing,\" said Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., a member of the party's leadership. <\/p>\n
Beyond that, \"we ought to go step by step to lower the cost\" of health care, he added, a formula repeated by numerous other Republicans interviewed in recent days. <\/p>\n
Across the political aisle, neither President Barack Obama nor congressional Democrats have said how they will react to a high court ruling that could wipe out the legislation they worked so hard to enact. <\/p>\n
\"We're not spending a whole bunch of time planning for contingencies,\" Obama said this spring at the annual meeting of The Associated Press. He expressed confidence the court would uphold the law, and neither he nor his aides have said what fallback plans are under discussion. \"We will be prepared in any eventuality,\" White House aide David Plouffe said Sunday on ABC's \"This <\/p>\n
Among Republicans, aides to Speaker John Boehner, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell and other key lawmakers have convened a series of meetings in recent weeks to plan a post-ruling strategy. <\/p>\n
A Supreme Court ruling is expected within the next two weeks on a challenge to the law, which has drawn fierce opposition among most Republicans for its requirement that most individuals carry health insurance. <\/p>\n
While three big insurance companies announced plans this past week to retain certain protections for an estimated 40 percent of all individuals who receive their coverage through work, there has been no advance word from the drug industry on how prescription costs for older people might be affected by a finding that the law is unconstitutional. <\/p>\n
Even so, Republicans say they have no plans for assuring continuity of a provision that reduces out-of-pocket costs for seniors with high drug expenses. This coverage gap is known as \"doughnut hole.\" <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
View original post here:<\/p>\n
4 presumed dead after avalanche on Mount McKinley<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" WASHINGTONCongressional Republicans intend to seek quick repeal of any parts of the health care law that survive a widely anticipated Supreme Court ruling, but don't plan to push replacement measures until after the fall elections or perhaps 2013. Continue reading