{"id":40481,"date":"2011-10-15T21:20:24","date_gmt":"2011-10-15T21:20:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/followup-ftl-neutrinos-explained-not-so-fast-folks-bad-astronomy\/"},"modified":"2011-10-15T21:20:24","modified_gmt":"2011-10-15T21:20:24","slug":"followup-ftl-neutrinos-explained-not-so-fast-folks-bad-astronomy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/astronomy\/followup-ftl-neutrinos-explained-not-so-fast-folks-bad-astronomy.php","title":{"rendered":"Followup: FTL neutrinos explained? Not so fast, folks. | Bad Astronomy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>If you haven&rsquo;t heard about the experiment that apparently showed that subatomic particles called neutrinos might move faster than light (what we in the know call <em>FTL<\/em>, to make us look cooler), then I assume this is your first time on the internet. If that&rsquo;s the case, then you can read <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/badastronomy\/2011\/09\/22\/faster-than-light-travel-discovered-slow-down-folks\/\">my writeup on what happened<\/a>.<\/p><p>Basically, neutrinos move very very fast, <em>almost<\/em> at the speed of light. Some scientists created neutrinos at CERN in Geneva, and then measured how long it took them to reach a detector called OPERA, located in Italy. When they did the math, it looked like the neutrinos actually got there by traveling a hair <em>faster<\/em> than the speed of light! 60 nanoseconds faster, to be accurate.<\/p><p>Was relativity doomed? <\/p><p>Nope. In fact, relativity may very well be what saves the day here. <\/p><p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-content\/plugins\/wp-o-matic\/cache\/1bdf6_enterprisewarp.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"331\" height=\"218\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-39352\" style=\"padding-left:10px; padding-right: 10px;\">First, most scientists were skeptical. Even the people running the experiment were skeptical, and were basically asking everyone else for help. They figured they might have made a mistake as well, and couldn&rsquo;t figure out what had happened. <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/badastronomy\/2011\/04\/08\/a-very-smart-kid-and-a-solid-theory\/\">Relativity is an <em>extremely<\/em> well-tested theory<\/a>, and doesn&rsquo;t (easily) allow for FTL. Despite some headlines screaming that Einstein might be wrong, most everyone figured the problem lay elsewhere.<\/p><p>Most everyone zeroed in on the timing of the experiment, which has to be extremely accurate. The entire flight time of a neutrino from Switzerland to Italy is only about 2.4 milliseconds, and the measurement accuracy needs to be to only a few nanoseconds &mdash; mind you, a nanosecond is a <em>billionth<\/em> of a second!<\/p><p>The scientists used a very sophisticated GPS setup to determine the timing, so that has been the focus of a lot of scrutiny as well. And <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1110.2685\">a new paper<\/a> just posted on the Physics Preprint Archive may have the answer&hellip; and it uses relativity.<\/p><p><span><\/span><\/p><p>Basically, what Einstein found is that the speed of light is the same for all observers. If I&rsquo;m moving at 0.9 times the speed of light toward you and turn on my flashlight, I see those photons moving away from me at the speed of light. The thing is, you see those photons moving <em>toward<\/em> you at the speed of light! This goes against common sense, which tells us that velocities add together; if I throw a baseball out car window, the velocity of the ball add to that of the car. <\/p><p>But light doesn&rsquo;t behave that way. And this changes a lot of things, including how two objects moving relative to each other measure distance, and even how they measure time. I might measure a meter stick in my hand as being (duh) one meter long, but an observer moving past me at a significant fraction of the speed of light would see it being shorter. It&rsquo;s just a consequence of the Universe making sure we all see the same speed of light.<\/p><p>And that&rsquo;s where neutrinos come in. In this new paper, author Ronald A.J. van Elburg lays out his case. The timing was measured using a GPS satellite orbiting the Earth, and <em>moving relative to CERN and OPERA<\/em>. That means the distance traveled by the neutrinos would be less as measured by the GPS sat as it would be from the ground, and therefore wouldn&rsquo;t take as long to cover it. Doing the detailed math, van Elburg calculates how much faster the neutrinos would be expected to arrive accounting for the satellite&rsquo;s motion, and he gets&hellip; 64 nanoseconds. That&rsquo;s almost exactly the discrepancy measured by the original experimenters.<\/p><p>Case closed!<\/p><p>Well, maybe. As I recall from the foofooraw that unfolded after the initial announcement, the original experimenters said they accounted for all relativistic effects. <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1109.4897\">The paper they published<\/a>, however, didn&rsquo;t include the details of how they did this, so it&rsquo;s not clear what they included and what they might have left out. It&rsquo;s possible van Elburg might be right, but I expect we haven&rsquo;t seen the end of this. After all, not long after the announcement, <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/plus.google.com\/108952536790629690817\/posts\/SsJJABfcJ7y\">a physicist asked<\/a> if they had accounted for gravitational time dilation &mdash; like relative velocity, gravity can also affect the flow of time, throwing off the measurement &mdash; and the experimenters said they had. <\/p><p>I had thought of something like this as well. CERN and OPERA are at different latitudes, and <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/badastronomy\/2011\/09\/27\/the-pressure-of-living-on-a-spinning-planet\/\">since the Earth rotates<\/a>, they are moving around the Earth&rsquo;s axis at different speeds. Could that be it? <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/plus.google.com\/108952536790629690817\/posts\/aaUnKZqA924\">I did the math<\/a>, and the answer is no. Too bad; it would&rsquo;ve been fun to be the person to have figured this out!<\/p><p>The bottom line here is that this experiment is still very interesting. I don&rsquo;t think we know exactly what&rsquo;s going on here yet &mdash; my bet is still on the statistics, since they didn&rsquo;t measure the speeds of individual neutrinos, but clouds of them, making the exact timing much harder &mdash; but it&rsquo;s hard to say. Like most other scientists, I think somewhere down the line here a mistake was made, and the neutrinos, like everything else we know of made of matter, travel slower than light. But if we&rsquo;re wrong, then we get new physics, which is great! And if we&rsquo;re right and figure out how, it means that future experiments will benefit from this. Win\/win.<\/p><p>Either way, my bet is that we&rsquo;re not done here. This new result is interesting and may very well be right, and be the dampening field that bursts the neutrino FTL warp bubble. But I&rsquo;ll wait for the reaction from the original experimenters to see what they say. If we&rsquo;ve learned one thing from all this, it&rsquo;s that it&rsquo;s best not to jump to conclusions.<\/p><hr width=\"30%\" align=\"left\"><em><p>Related posts:<\/p><p>- <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/badastronomy\/2011\/09\/22\/faster-than-light-travel-discovered-slow-down-folks\/\">Faster-than-light travel discovered? Slow down, folks<\/a><br>- <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/badastronomy\/2011\/04\/08\/a-very-smart-kid-and-a-solid-theory\/\">A (very) smart kid and a solid theory<\/a><br>- <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/badastronomy\/2011\/10\/06\/wall-street-journal-neutrinos-show-climate-change-isnt-real\/\">Wall Street Journal: neutrinos show climate change isn&rsquo;t real<\/a><br>- <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/badastronomy\/2011\/10\/07\/followup-on-the-wsj-climate-denial-oped\/\">Followup on the WSJ climate denial OpEd<\/a><\/p><p><\/p><\/em><p><a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/feedads.g.doubleclick.net\/~a\/1mw1TS9jpvhZqFjTAxayhpq7tDU\/0\/da\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-content\/plugins\/wp-o-matic\/cache\/1bdf6_di\" border=\"0\" style=\"padding-left:10px; padding-right: 10px;\"><\/a><br><a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/feedads.g.doubleclick.net\/~a\/1mw1TS9jpvhZqFjTAxayhpq7tDU\/1\/da\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-content\/plugins\/wp-o-matic\/cache\/db893_di\" border=\"0\" style=\"padding-left:10px; padding-right: 10px;\"><\/a><\/p><p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-content\/plugins\/wp-o-matic\/cache\/db893_f7zPKLXMF3w\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\" style=\"padding-left:10px; padding-right: 10px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-content\/plugins\/wp-o-matic\/cache\/db893_s7JxVxeSjsU\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\" style=\"padding-left:10px; padding-right: 10px;\"><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If you haven&rsquo;t heard about the experiment that apparently showed that subatomic particles called neutrinos might move faster than light (what we in the know call FTL, to make us look cooler), then I assume this is your first time &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/astronomy\/followup-ftl-neutrinos-explained-not-so-fast-folks-bad-astronomy.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-40481","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-astronomy"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40481"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40481"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40481\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40481"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40481"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40481"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}