![\"sausage\"](\"http:\/\/euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-content\/plugins\/wp-o-matic\/cache\/dafdb_sausage.jpg\")
<\/p><\/p>
Compare the extremely detailed history of baseball cards<\/a> and the somewhat skeletal entry on interior decorating<\/a> on Wikipedia, the Font of All Knowledge, and you’ll get a sense of what a recent paper<\/a> by computer scientists concluded: Wikipedia’s primarily a creation of man, not of woman.<\/p> After a NYTimes trend piece<\/a> anecdotally discussed the disparity in January, citing Wikipedia’s male-heavy geek culture roots as the source, this intrepid bunch decided to actually do the numbers, pulling the data on editors’ gender from their profile information. And indeed, of the editors who joined in 2009 and disclosed gender, only about 16% were female, and they made only 9% of the cohort’s edits. Looking at signups over time, the researchers also saw that Wikipedia’s gender gap isn’t closing, in contrast to many social media sites, where women are now more likely to participate than men. This may be because Wikipedia looks like a slightly chilly place for new female users: self-identified women were more likely to get their early edits reverted than men were.<\/p> It’s neat that we now have real numbers in the discussion of Wikipedia’s gender politics. But there are few problems with a ...<\/p> Compare the extremely detailed history of baseball cards and the somewhat skeletal entry on interior decorating on Wikipedia, the Font of All Knowledge, and you’ll get a sense of what a recent paper by computer scientists concluded: Wikipedia’s primarily a … Continue reading <\/a>
<\/a><\/p>
<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"