I wish to take a few \"shots\" at all the people defending the right to bear arms.<\/p>\n
1) It is necessary to protect the right to free speech. Really? Guns don't speak- they shoot or intimidate. What one needs to speak instead is intelligence!<\/p>\n
2) To protect against the (Deep State?) government. Really? How do machine guns, automatics and what not, fare against fighter planes or army tanks?<\/p>\n
3) Self defense is another talking point. It can be deadly for the victim as well as the attacker, or even an innocent bystander.<\/p>\n
4) Hunting is usually a sport, as is target shooting. Both are legal and enjoyable. Standing in front of government buildings and proudly displaying your deadly weapons, really is no brains in my book.<\/p>\n
Disclaimer: As submitted to the Arizona Daily Star.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Here is the original post:<\/p>\n
Letter: the second amendment | Letters to the Editor | tucson.com - Arizona Daily Star<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" I wish to take a few \"shots\" at all the people defending the right to bear arms. 1) It is necessary to protect the right to free speech. Continue reading