The Moral Machine is an online survey designed by MIT researchers to gauge how the public would want an autonomous car to behave in a scenario in which someone has to die. It asks questions like: “If an autonomous car has to choose between killing a man or a woman, who should it kill? What if the woman is elderly but the man is young?”<\/p>
Essentially, it’s a 21st century update on the Trolley Problem, an ethical thought experiment no doubt permanently etched into the mind of anyone who’s seen the second season of “The Good Place.”<\/a><\/p> The MIT team launched the Moral Machine<\/a> in 2016, and more than two million people from 233 countries participated in the survey — quite a significant sample size.<\/p> On Wednesday, the researchers published the results<\/a> of the experiment in the journal Nature<\/em>, and they really aren’t all that surprising: Respondents value the life of a baby over all others, with a female child, male child, and pregnant woman following closely behind. Yawn.<\/p> It’s when you look at the other end of the spectrum — the characters survey respondents were least likely to “save” — that you’ll see something startling: Survey respondents would rather the autonomous car kill a human<\/em> criminal than a dog.<\/p> While the team designed the survey to help shape the future of autonomous vehicles, it’s hard not to focus on this troubling valuing of a dog’s life over that of any<\/em> human, criminal or not. Does this tell us something important about how society views the criminal class? Reveal that we’re all monsters when hidden behind the internet’s cloak of anonymity<\/a>? Confirm that we really<\/em> like dogs?<\/p> The MIT team doesn’t address any of these questions in their paper, and really, we wouldn’t expect them to — it’s their job to report the survey results, not extrapolate some deeper meaning from them. But whether the Moral Machine informs the future of autonomous vehicles or not, it’s certainly held up a mirror to humanity’s values, and we do not like the reflection we see.<\/p> READ MORE:<\/strong> Driverless Cars Should Spare Young People Over Old in Unavoidable Accidents, Massive Survey Finds<\/a> [Motherboard<\/em>]<\/p> More on the Moral Machine: MIT’s “Moral Machine” Lets You Decide Who Lives & Dies in Self-Driving Car Crashes<\/a><\/strong><\/em><\/p> More here: Snap Decisions On first glance, a site that collects people\u2019s opinions about whose life an autonomous car should favor \u00a0doesn\u2019t tell us anything we didn\u2019t already know. Continue reading Ethical Dilemma<\/h2>
![\"moral](\"https:\/\/wp-assets.futurism.com\/2018\/10\/Moral-Machine.jpg\")
<\/h2>
Ugly Reflection<\/h2>
![](\"https:\/\/wp-assets.futurism.com\/2018\/10\/Trolley-Prob-1200x630.jpg\")
<\/p>
People Would Rather a Self-Driving Car Kill a Criminal Than a Dog<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"