ABA Journal Web 100, Best Law Blogs (2017); ABA Journal Blawg 100 (2015-16) <\/p>\n
by John Wesley Hall Criminal Defense Lawyer and Search and seizure law consultant Little Rock, Arkansas Contact: forhall @ aol.com \/ The Book http:\/\/www.johnwesleyhall.com<\/a><\/p>\n 2003-18,online since Feb. 24, 2003 <\/p>\n ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<\/p>\n Fourth Amendment cases, citations, and links<\/p>\n Latest Slip Opinions: U.S. Supreme Court (Home) Federal Appellate Courts Opinions First Circuit Second Circuit Third Circuit Fourth Circuit Fifth Circuit Sixth Circuit Seventh Circuit Eighth Circuit Ninth Circuit Tenth Circuit EleventhCircuit D.C. CircuitFederal CircuitForeign Intell.Surv.Ct.FDsys, many district courts, other federal courtsMilitary Courts: C.A.A.F., Army, AF, N-M, CG, SF State courts (and some USDC opinions)<\/p>\n Google Scholar Advanced Google Scholar Google search tips LexisWeb LII State Appellate Courts LexisONE free caselaw Findlaw Free Opinions To search Search and Seizure on Lexis.com $<\/p>\n Research Links: Supreme Court: SCOTUSBlog S. Ct. Docket Solicitor General's site SCOTUSreport Briefs online (but no amicus briefs) Oyez Project (NWU) \"On the Docket\"Medill S.Ct. Monitor: Law.com S.Ct. Com't'ry: Law.com <\/p>\n General (many free): LexisWeb Google Scholar | Google LexisOne Legal Website Directory Crimelynx Lexis.com $ Lexis.com (criminal law\/ 4th Amd) $ Findlaw.com Findlaw.com (4th Amd) Westlaw.com $ F.R.Crim.P. 41 http:\/\/www.fd.org<\/a> Federal Law Enforcement Training Center Resources FBI Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide (2008) (pdf) DEA Agents Manual (2002) (download) DOJ Computer Search Manual (2009) (pdf)Stringrays (ACLU No. Cal.) (pdf)<\/p>\n Congressional Research Service: --Electronic Communications Privacy Act (2012) --Overview of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (2012) --Outline of Federal Statutes Governing Wiretapping and Electronic Eavesdropping (2012) --Federal Statutes Governing Wiretapping and Electronic Eavesdropping (2012) --Federal Laws Relating to Cybersecurity: Discussion of Proposed Revisions (2012) ACLU on privacy Privacy FoundationElectronic Frontier Foundation NACDLs Domestic Drone Information Center Electronic Privacy Information Center Criminal Appeal (post-conviction) (9th Cir.) Section 1983 Blog <\/p>\n \"If it was easy, everybody would be doing it. It isn't, and they don't.\" Me<\/p>\n I am still learning.Domenico Giuntalodi (but misattributed to Michelangelo Buonarroti (common phrase throughout 1500's)). <\/p>\n \"Love work; hate mastery over others; and avoid intimacy with the government.\" Shemaya, in the Thalmud<\/p>\n \"A system of law that not only makes certain conduct criminal, but also lays down rules for the conduct of the authorities, often becomes complex in its application to individual cases, and will from time to time produce imperfect results, especially if one's attention is confined to the particular case at bar. Some criminals do go free because of the necessity of keeping government and its servants in their place. That is one of the costs of having and enforcing a Bill of Rights. This country is built on the assumption that the cost is worth paying, and that in the long run we are all both freer and safer if the Constitution is strictly enforced.\" Williams v. Nix, 700 F. 2d 1164, 1173 (8th Cir. 1983) (Richard Sheppard Arnold, J.), rev'd Nix v. Williams, 467 US. 431 (1984).<\/p>\n \"The criminal goes free, if he must, but it is the law that sets him free. Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence.\"Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 659 (1961).<\/p>\n \"Any costs the exclusionary rule are costs imposed directly by the Fourth Amendment.\"Yale Kamisar, 86 Mich.L.Rev. 1, 36 n. 151 (1987).<\/p>\n \"There have been powerful hydraulic pressures throughout our history that bear heavily on the Court to water down constitutional guarantees and give the police the upper hand. That hydraulic pressure has probably never been greater than it is today.\" Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 39 (1968) (Douglas, J., dissenting). <\/p>\n \"The great end, for which men entered into society, was to secure their property.\" Entick v. Carrington, 19 How.St.Tr. 1029, 1066, 95 Eng. Rep. 807 (C.P. 1765)<\/p>\n \"It is a fair summary of history to say that the safeguards of liberty have frequently been forged in controversies involving not very nice people. And so, while we are concerned here with a shabby defrauder, we must deal with his case in the context of what are really the great themes expressed by the Fourth Amendment.\" United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56, 69 (1950) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting) <\/p>\n \"The course of true law pertaining to searches and seizures, as enunciated here, has notto put it mildlyrun smooth.\" Chapman v. United States, 365 U.S. 610, 618 (1961) (Frankfurter, J., concurring). <\/p>\n \"A search is a search, even if it happens to disclose nothing but the bottom of a turntable.\" Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321, 325 (1987) <\/p>\n \"For the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. ... But what he seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally protected.\" Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 351 (1967) <\/p>\n Experience should teach us to be most on guard to protect liberty when the Governments purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding. United States v. Olmstead, 277 U.S. 438, 479 (1925) (Brandeis, J., dissenting) <\/p>\n Libertythe freedom from unwarranted intrusion by governmentis as easily lost through insistent nibbles by government officials who seek to do their jobs too well as by those whose purpose it is to oppress; the piranha can be as deadly as the shark. United States v. $124,570, 873 F.2d 1240, 1246 (9th Cir. 1989) <\/p>\n \"You can't always get what you want \/ But if you try sometimes \/ You just might find \/ You get what you need.\" Mick Jagger & Keith Richards <\/p>\n \"In Germany, they first came for the communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Catholic. Then they came for meand by that time there was nobody left to speak up.\" Martin Niemller (1945) [he served seven years in a concentration camp] <\/p>\n You know, most men would get discouraged by now. Fortunately for you, I am not most men!---Pep Le Pew<\/p>\n Website design by Wally Waller, Little Rock <\/p>\n <\/p>\n See the rest here:<\/p>\n Fourth Amendment - Official Site<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" ABA Journal Web 100, Best Law Blogs (2017); ABA Journal Blawg 100 (2015-16) by John Wesley Hall Criminal Defense Lawyer and Search and seizure law consultant Little Rock, Arkansas Contact: forhall @ aol.com \/ The Book http:\/\/www.johnwesleyhall.com<\/a> 2003-18,online since Feb. Continue reading