{"id":26618,"date":"2010-07-29T13:38:31","date_gmt":"2010-07-29T13:38:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/on-the-origin-of-science-writers-not-exactly-rocket-science\/"},"modified":"2010-07-29T13:38:31","modified_gmt":"2010-07-29T13:38:31","slug":"on-the-origin-of-science-writers-not-exactly-rocket-science","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/astronomy\/on-the-origin-of-science-writers-not-exactly-rocket-science.php","title":{"rendered":"On the Origin of Science Writers | Not Exactly Rocket Science"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Writing\"<\/a>
Every now and then, I get an email from someone who’s keen to get into science writing and wants to know how I started. Whenever I reply, and I always try to, I’m always left with the nagging feeling that my experience is but one of a multitude of routes that people have taken. Science writing (whether you want to call it journalism, blogging, communication and so on) is a diverse field, as are the people working in it. It would be far more illuminating for a newbie to see a variety of stories rather than just one.<\/p>

This was the origin of this thread of origins. I will be asking science writers around the world to do what they do best – tell a story – about the thing they know best – themselves. This will be a perpetual thread that I hope will act as a lasting resource for the writers of tomorrow to take inspiration from.<\/p>

Some kind individuals have already submitted their stories and I hope that many more will chip in. You can already see that they’re a varied bunch. Some stumbled into it by accident. Some came from traditional journalistic backgrounds. Others were bitten by a radioactive Carl Sagan. The more the stories accumulate, the better this diversity reveals itself.<\/p>

Who should contribute to this thread?<\/strong><\/p>

Anyone who regularly writes about science, and preferably has been doing it for a couple of years now. I originally wanted to focus on science journalists but because all these definitions are bleeding into one, I’m opening it to all manner of science writers. From blogger to book writer, beginner to veteran, Asimov to Zimmer, tell us your story.<\/p>

What should I say? <\/strong><\/p>

You’ll see from the existing entries (which are virtually unedited) that there’s a lot of variety in content, tone and length. This is as it should be – science writers are a diverse bunch and it would be a shame to edit them into uniformity. But essentially, there are two basic questions:<\/p>