{"id":255207,"date":"2015-11-02T12:42:12","date_gmt":"2015-11-02T17:42:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.eugenesis.com\/agnosticism-victorian-web\/"},"modified":"2015-11-02T12:42:12","modified_gmt":"2015-11-02T17:42:12","slug":"agnosticism-victorian-web","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/agnosticism\/agnosticism-victorian-web.php","title":{"rendered":"Agnosticism &#8211; Victorian Web"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    [Disponible en    espaol]  <\/p>\n<p>    his    word, which has in the twentieth century come to signify little    more than passive disbelief, was invented by Thomas Henry    Huxley at Cambridge in the 1860s. According to Charles    Blinderman, Professor Emeritus at Clark University, \"The word    seems to have been invented by him towards the end of the '60s,    at an early meeting of the Metaphysical Society. He did not use    the term until post-1870.\" Huxley, Darwin's great advocate,    coined the term, he says, because everyone else was an \"-ist\"    of one kind or another, and he had no label to apply to his own    beliefs. He meant to distinguish himself from those whose faith    provided answers to the most profound questions:  <\/p>\n<p>    Does God exist? How can we know Him? (Why isn't He revealed    more unambiguously in the scriptures?) Why would He create    evil, and why would He allow the good to suffer and the wicked    to flourish? Does He intervene miraculously in this world?  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    Thomas Henry Huxley. Portrait bust    in Natural History Museum, London. Photograph by GPL.  <\/p>\n<p>    He found that he could not answer those questions. Furthermore,    he came to believe that no one could, without resorting to a    knowledge (or gnosis) which goes beyond reason. Huxley, we must    remember, was one of the first scientists to think of science    as his profession; before the Victorian period, most scientific    data was collected by vicars with time on their hands. As a    professional scientist, Huxley insisted on reason and the    empirical method as the only properly scientific way of knowing    this world. For him faith meant believing what is literally    incredible (i.e., unreasonable), and thus was impossible for a    scientist. In dealing logically with the unknown, one may infer    only phenomena like those he already understands. At first he    believed that any faith involved bad logic (see Jean-Paul    Sartre on \"Bad Faith\"), but later retreated from this position.    Other agnostics (like Leslie Stephen, George Eliot, and W.K.    Clifford) have been very willing to take up this position,    however. Huxley always insisted that there was no such thing as    organized Agnosticism, that as far as he was concerned the term    described only his own beliefs. But to a large extent this    child outgrew its parent.  <\/p>\n<p>    The distinguishing characteristic of Victorian unbelief was the    degree to which it became an alternative to traditional    religion, and when men like Leslie Stephen and W.K. Clifford    began calling themselves Agnostics, Agnosticism achieved the    kind of success which Comte had tried to create for    Positivism (which Huxley had dismissed as \"Catholicism minus    Christianity\"). For the first time, men and women who could not    accept the dogmas required by religions could avail themselves    of a body of logical argument. By 1884, they even had their own    journal, the Agnostic Annual.  <\/p>\n<p>    Those who attacked Huxley and agnosticism tended to ignore the    careful distinctions which he made, lumping agnostics in with    atheists, materialists,    and other \"infidels.\" Taken in addition to the very traditional    and conservative morals of the first Agnostics, who were    careful to comport themselves like model middle-class    Victorians, the distinctions are important to an explanation of    the movement's influence. Where the atheist says that God does    not exist, the agnostic says that reason can never be used to    prove the existence of a being who transcends reason, and    whether or not He exists, He does not intervene in human    affairs, making speculation about His existence moot. We are on    our own.  <\/p>\n<p>    Twentieth-century thinkers, especially existentialists, have    used agnosticism as a jumping-off point for their own    philosophies, and the imprecision with which the term is used    these days is a measure of its success. Much of that success is    due to Huxley's creation of the name. \"Agnosticism\" has a    cachet which neither \"rational nonbelief\" nor any other phrase    could approximate.  <\/p>\n<p>    Charles Blinderman, private letter, 1 July 2001. [In his letter    Dr. Blindermin also points out that some \"historians claim that    Lady Burton used 'agosticism' before Huxley.\" Whether Huxley    borrowed the term from her, or more likely independently coined    it, his influence made the term current.]  <\/p>\n<p>        Victorian    Web  <\/p>\n<p>        Religion  <\/p>\n<p>    Created 1987; last modified 1 July 2001  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.victorianweb.org\/religion\/agnos.html\" title=\"Agnosticism - Victorian Web\">Agnosticism - Victorian Web<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> [Disponible en espaol] his word, which has in the twentieth century come to signify little more than passive disbelief, was invented by Thomas Henry Huxley at Cambridge in the 1860s. According to Charles Blinderman, Professor Emeritus at Clark University, \"The word seems to have been invented by him towards the end of the '60s, at an early meeting of the Metaphysical Society.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/agnosticism\/agnosticism-victorian-web.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":57,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[577694],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-255207","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-agnosticism"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255207"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/57"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=255207"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255207\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=255207"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=255207"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=255207"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}