Meet the new creationism-in-sheep's-clothing: The \"academic freedom\" bill <\/p>\n
Imagine an American public school where science textbooks were obligated to debunk Charles Darwin; where students could deny global warming and still get an A, and where college professors could tell Biology 101 students that the world was born on the back of a giant turtle. Sounds a little backwards for 2013, right? <\/p>\n
Frighteningly, these are all real scenarios that could occur under new education bills proposed this year. But the language in most of these bills is so obtuse that you might not evenknowif you live in one of thesix statesconsidering them (Montana, Colorado, Oklahoma, Arizona, Missouri, and Indiana.) <\/p>\n
SEE MORE: Is preschool really a better investment than buying stock? <\/p>\n
America, meet the new creationism-in-sheep's-clothing: The \"academic freedom\" bill. <\/p>\n
Unlike bills that explicitly require intelligent design and religious curriculums to be taught in schools, academic freedom bills simply permit teachers, schools, and students to explore alternative theories without repercussions. Sounds harmless, right? But Eric Meikle, education project director at the National Center for Science Education, explains that what these bills really do is \"open the door for creationist literature.\" And in the last few years, the number of these bills has skyrocketed, with51 proposed since 2004, and twice as many proposed this year than in all of 2012. (Remember, it's only February.) <\/p>\n
SEE MORE: America's nosediving law-school applications: By the numbers <\/p>\n
Needless to say, science teachers aren't thrilled. \"Intelligent design and anti-global warming curriculums harm the general public's perceptions of science, which can decrease students' interest in pursuing science careers,\" says Kathy Trundle, president of theAssociation for Science Teacher Education. \"In turn, U.S. advancements in science [are] negatively impacted.\" Rick Grosberg, an evolution and ecology professor at the University of California at Davis, points out that \"the mere act of teaching intelligent design as if it were an alternative scientific explanation confuses students and the public about what science is.\" <\/p>\n
The secret weapon in these bills is the idea that pupils should understand the \"strengths and weaknesses\" of different scientific theories. Which theories? Well, as abill proposed by four Republican state senators in Arizonamakes clear, that would be \"biological evolution, the chemical origins of life, global warming and human cloning.\" Coincidentally, these are the exact same theories thatHouse Bill 1674in Oklahoma, proposed by GOP state Rep. Gus Blackwell, considers controversial. His legislation even prevents teachers from flunking students who write papers debunking their textbook material. Seriously. <\/p>\n
SEE MORE: When parents pay for college, could kids' grades suffer? <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Visit link: Meet the new creationism-in-sheep's-clothing: The \"academic freedom\" bill Imagine an American public school where science textbooks were obligated to debunk Charles Darwin; where students could deny global warming and still get an A, and where college professors could tell Biology 101 students that the world was born on the back of a giant turtle. Continue reading
\nThe growing undercover effort to get God into biology class<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"