This is a guest post from M. A. Loera Snchez from the iGEM team UANL 2012. I have carried out a few small grammar edits but otherwise the essay is all his work, and I would like to thank him for the opportunity to host it on my blog. All references are below the main text. <\/p>\n
The mainstream fronts of synthetic biology <\/p>\n
What I cannot build, I cannot understand. <\/p>\n
This phrase by the genius physicist Richard Feynman is cleverly encrypted into the genetic code of the first bacterial cells with an artificial genome that have ever existed. <\/p>\n
Actually the quote says what I cannot create, but maybe the scientists at the JCVI who are behind this tremendous breakthrough- preferred to save some base pairs to avoid the use of the word create and its tricky implications.They published this work in 2010 and opened a whole new world of possibilities and made it completely clear to anyone what we mean when we talk about Synthetic Biology and what its ultimate purpose should be: to understand life by building it. <\/p>\n
Although the term Synthetic Biology has been around since the mid-1970s, the definition of it has been very vague: some people would call Synthetic Biology anything related to general genetic engineering procedures; others, perhaps more rightfully, would claim to be doing Synthetic Biology because of working with DNA synthesis or making bacteria behave like tiny computers. Even the 2010 report by the US Presidencial Comission for the Study of Bioethical Issues has to define the term considering different points of view (that of the molecular biology, the chemist and the engineer) and states that the activities related to Synthetic Biology are considered by some to be just extensions of already existing fields, like Molecular Biology, Genetic Engineering and Microbiology. <\/p>\n
I remember (oh, the shame!) being skeptic about the possibility of something so oxymoronic being, well true. I still turn red when I recall that I kind of corrected the person who first said Synthetic Biology to me by telling her that what she wanted to say was maybe Systems Biology. <\/p>\n
So what is it really? <\/p>\n
Well, my work in Bio! has been devoted to dig into the deeps of Synthetic Biology and the iGEM competition, and throughout this time I began to notice what I would call the mainstream fronts of Synthetic Biology. These are the main orientations that so called Synthetic Biology projects would take and by enlisting them, I think it will be easier to clarify the distinctive characteristics of this field. <\/p>\n
Front 1: DNA synthesis <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Read more from the original source: This is a guest post from M. A Continue reading
\nThe mainstream fronts of Synthetic Biology: Guest post<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"