New recommendations for human genome editing <\/p>\n
Given how controversial genetically modified corn is, it's no wonder that the prospect of genetically modifying humans pushes a lot of people's buttons. But we already have gene therapies, and new technologies are making it faster, safer, and less expensive to modify the human genome in a range of ways. That has the science community and policymakers scrambling to set responsible guidelines for the use of genome editing. <\/p>\n
In 2015, the International Summit on Human Gene Editing recommended holding off until the methods could be shown safe and effective, and until there was some public consensus about their use. Last week, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine released recommendations that suggested at least some of those criteria had been met. <\/p>\n
The bottom line, according to report co-chair Richard Hynes of M.I.T., is this: <\/p>\n
In all cases, the panel recommended public input on the appropriate uses of genome editing. But there remain enormous questions - what that public engagement should look like, how consensus might be defined or achieved, and how public opinion would translate into federal - or even international - policy. <\/p>\n
Guests: <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Read more: New recommendations for human genome editing Given how controversial genetically modified corn is, it's no wonder that the prospect of genetically modifying humans pushes a lot of people's buttons. But we already have gene therapies, and new technologies are making it faster, safer, and less expensive to modify the human genome in a range of ways. That has the science community and policymakers scrambling to set responsible guidelines for the use of genome editing. Continue reading
\nNational Academy Calls for Public Input on Human Genetic ... - WCAI - WCAI<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"