Re \"Label this one 'Do Not Touch'\" (Dan Morain, Feb. 19): Morain's article shows a lack of understanding of the issues involved in genetic engineering with regard to foodstuffs, and an unfortunate willingness to accept the arguments of proponents of the technology rather than those who are critical of it. <\/p>\n
I have been following this issue for over a decade, objectively looking at evidence on both sides, and have become convinced that there are serious questions with GMOs. At root is the fact that for the first time in the history of the planet, it has become possible for scientists to cross species boundaries as they endeavor to produce what are essentially new life forms.They may look like their natural counterparts, but they may contain genetic material from a variety of completely different life forms. <\/p>\n
A tomato may contain material from animals, insects, vituses, bacteria, etc., together in a completely new mix. Consequences? Unknown! Problems already appearing. <\/p>\n
-- Professor Robert Millar, Walnut Creek <\/p>\n
\u00a9 Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved. <\/p>\n
What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com <\/p>\n
Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.) <\/p>\n
Here are some rules of the road: <\/p>\n
\u2022 Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the \"Report Abuse\" link to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior. <\/p>\n
\u2022 Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear. <\/p>\n
\u2022 Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals. <\/p>\n
\u2022 Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. <\/p>\n
\u2022 Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box. <\/p>\n
\u2022 Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time. <\/p>\n
\u2022 Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed. <\/p>\n
\u2022 Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience. <\/p>\n
\u2022 Don't flag other users' comments just because you don't agree with their point of view. Please only flag comments that violate these guidelines. <\/p>\n
You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the \"Report Abuse\" link to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com<\/a>. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa. <\/p>\n If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n Originally posted here: Re \"Label this one 'Do Not Touch'\" (Dan Morain, Feb. 19): Morain's article shows a lack of understanding of the issues involved in genetic engineering with regard to foodstuffs, and an unfortunate willingness to accept the arguments of proponents of the technology rather than those who are critical of it. I have been following this issue for over a decade, objectively looking at evidence on both sides, and have become convinced that there are serious questions with GMOs Continue reading
\nGenetic engineering more dangerous than Morain thinks<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"