{"id":247941,"date":"2012-02-26T06:38:16","date_gmt":"2012-02-26T06:38:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.eugenesis.com\/dna-testing-of-suspected-felons-upheld-in-california\/"},"modified":"2012-02-26T06:38:16","modified_gmt":"2012-02-26T06:38:16","slug":"dna-testing-of-suspected-felons-upheld-in-california","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/dna-testing-of-suspected-felons-upheld-in-california.php","title":{"rendered":"DNA Testing Of Suspected Felons Upheld In California"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    February 25, 2012  <\/p>\n<p>      A ruling by a federal appeals court on Thursday will allow      California law enforcement officers to continue collecting      DNA samples from adults who were arrested for felonies.    <\/p>\n<p>      A panel of judges of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals      ruled that a 2004 California law requiring officials to      collect the DNA samples does not violate the U.S.      Constitution\u2019s ban on unreasonable searches.    <\/p>\n<p>      \u201cDNA analysis is an extraordinarily effective tool for law      enforcement to identify arrestees, solve past crimes, and      exonerate innocent suspects,\u201d Judge Milan Smith wrote in the      decision.    <\/p>\n<p>      The DNA samples are analyzed for certain identifying markers,      and the information is stored in a nationwide database.    <\/p>\n<p>      A person who is tested and not convicted is able to have the      sample destroyed and their DNA profile removed from the      database.    <\/p>\n<p>      In 2009, four California residents asked the court to issue      an order barring the state from collecting DNA samples from      people who were arrested but not convicted.&nbsp; The      district court rejected the request during that time, and the      9th Circuit upheld that decision.    <\/p>\n<p>      However, Judge William Fletcher disagreed, saying      fingerprints are taken to identify a person upon arrest,      whereas DNA samples \u201care taken solely for an investigative      purpose, without warrant or reasonable suspicion.\u201d    <\/p>\n<p>      Michael Risher, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties      Union who represented the plaintiffs, said that the majority      allows the government to treat arrestees as if they have been      convicted of some sort of crime.    <\/p>\n<p>      The law was part of a 2004 ballot measure that took effect in      2009, requiring police to swab an inner cheek of all felony      arrestees for DNA.&nbsp; The previous law required DNA      samples from convicted felons.    <\/p>\n<p>      Risher said in a statement that the state has no evidence      that \u201ctaking (DNA) from people who are not convicted does      anything to solve crime.\u201d    <\/p>\n<p>      \u2014    <\/p>\n<p>      On the Net:    <\/p>\n<p>    Source: RedOrbit Staff &amp; Wire Reports  <\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Link:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.redorbit.com\/news\/general\/1112481615\/dna-testing-of-suspected-felons-upheld-in-california\/\" title=\"DNA Testing Of Suspected Felons Upheld In California\">DNA Testing Of Suspected Felons Upheld In California<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> February 25, 2012 A ruling by a federal appeals court on Thursday will allow California law enforcement officers to continue collecting DNA samples from adults who were arrested for felonies. A panel of judges of the 9th U.S.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/dna\/dna-testing-of-suspected-felons-upheld-in-california.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":57,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[577489],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-247941","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dna"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247941"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/57"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=247941"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247941\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=247941"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=247941"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=247941"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}