{"id":243105,"date":"2012-10-04T03:12:46","date_gmt":"2012-10-04T03:12:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.eugenesis.com\/comparing-food-safety-testing-practices-in-the-us-and-europe-how-fast-is-fast-enough\/"},"modified":"2012-10-04T03:12:46","modified_gmt":"2012-10-04T03:12:46","slug":"comparing-food-safety-testing-practices-in-the-us-and-europe-how-fast-is-fast-enough","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/microbiology\/comparing-food-safety-testing-practices-in-the-us-and-europe-how-fast-is-fast-enough.php","title":{"rendered":"Comparing Food Safety Testing Practices in the US and Europe: How Fast Is Fast Enough?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    According to Food Micro7, a new market research report from    Strategic    Consulting, Inc., US food producers are moving more quickly    to new, rapid technologies for their food safety testing programs, while    their European counterparts remain more faithful to traditional    microbiology test methods.  <\/p>\n<p>    Woodstock, VT (PRWEB) October 03, 2012  <\/p>\n<p>    Food Micro, Seventh Edition:    Comparison of the Food Microbiology Testing Markets in the US    and EU (Food Micro7) from Strategic Consulting, Inc.    (SCI), compares total test volume, market value and growth in    food microbiology testing, including the organisms tested and    the technologies used for food safety testing in each region.  <\/p>\n<p>    According to Tom    Weschler, president of Strategic Consulting and lead author    of Food Micro7, an important difference between the US and    European markets is the test methods used, particularly for    pathogen testing. In general, US food producers have embraced    rapid test methods that are touted as easier to use and    delivering faster results. European food producers have been    slower to adopt these newer technologies, and have continued to    use a higher percentage of traditional, culture-based test    methods.  <\/p>\n<p>    European food producers are adopting rapid test methods but at    a slower rate than their US counterparts, Weschler says.    Nearly 89% of pathogen tests conducted in the US in 2010 used    rapid methods, compared to just over 42% of the pathogen tests    conducted in the EU in 2011. There appears to be less urgency    for pathogen test results in Europe when compared to the US,    where faster test results are a key driver in the conversion    from traditional to newer microbiology tests methods, Weschler    says.  <\/p>\n<p>    The United States and Europe are substantial markets for    food safety    microbiology testing. Food producers in the two regions draw    on an increasingly global food supply to provide consumers    access to a broad array of foods year-round. At the same time,    consumers are more concerned about the safety of their food,    due to increasing food recalls and heightened press coverage of    pathogen outbreaks that sicken people in multiple states and    countries.  <\/p>\n<p>    With a population of more than 500 million, the 27 countries of    the EU conducted an estimated 275.3 million food safety    microbiology tests in 2011. US food producers conducted 213.2    million tests in 2010, for an estimated population of 310    million.  <\/p>\n<p>    Routine microbiology tests are used to determine the presence    and levels of microorganisms in the food plant or the food    product. Routine tests accounted for 78% of all food    microbiology tests performed in the US. The remaining 22% were    pathogen tests, which look for specific organisms that have the    potential to cause human disease, such as Salmonella, Listeria,    Campylobacter and E. coli O157.  <\/p>\n<p>    In Europe, routine tests accounted for 82% of all food    microbiology tests conducted in 2011, while pathogen tests    accounts for just 18%. Thus, while Europe conducts more    pathogen tests by volume (49.9 million in the EU versus 46.2    million in the US), pathogen testing in the US represents a    greater percentage of overall food microbiology testing and is    growing at a faster rate.  <\/p>\n<p>    Strategic Consulting has published seven market reports to date    reviewing microbiology testing practices and technology in the    food industry. The food sector represents almost 50% of the    total industrial microbiology testing market, and is more than    double the size of any other industrial segment including    pharmaceutical, personal care products, beverage,    environmental, and industrial processes.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Go here to read the rest:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/comparing-food-safety-testing-practices-us-europe-fast-060038663.html;_ylt=A2KJ3Ceb_mxQ8g0AtrL_wgt.\" title=\"Comparing Food Safety Testing Practices in the US and Europe: How Fast Is Fast Enough?\">Comparing Food Safety Testing Practices in the US and Europe: How Fast Is Fast Enough?<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> According to Food Micro7, a new market research report from Strategic Consulting, Inc., US food producers are moving more quickly to new, rapid technologies for their food safety testing programs, while their European counterparts remain more faithful to traditional microbiology test methods. Woodstock, VT (PRWEB) October 03, 2012 Food Micro, Seventh Edition: Comparison of the Food Microbiology Testing Markets in the US and EU (Food Micro7) from Strategic Consulting, Inc.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/microbiology\/comparing-food-safety-testing-practices-in-the-us-and-europe-how-fast-is-fast-enough.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":57,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[577473],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-243105","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-microbiology"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/243105"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/57"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=243105"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/243105\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=243105"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=243105"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=243105"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}