{"id":241357,"date":"2014-08-23T05:47:54","date_gmt":"2014-08-23T09:47:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.eugenesis.com\/evolution-main-page-conservapedia\/"},"modified":"2014-08-23T05:47:54","modified_gmt":"2014-08-23T09:47:54","slug":"evolution-main-page-conservapedia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/behavioral-science\/evolution-main-page-conservapedia.php","title":{"rendered":"Evolution &#8211; Main Page &#8211; Conservapedia"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>From Conservapedia    <\/p>\n<p>    The theory of evolution is a naturalistic theory of the history of life on earth (this refers to the    theory of evolution which employs methodological naturalism and    is taught in schools and universities). Merriam-Webster's    dictionary gives the following definition of evolution: \"a    theory that the various types of animals and plants have their    origin in other preexisting types and that the distinguishable    differences are due to modifications in successive    generations...\"[2] Currently, there are several    theories of evolution.  <\/p>\n<p>    Since World War    II a majority of the most prominent and vocal defenders of    the evolutionary position which employs methodological    naturalism have been atheists and agnostics (see also: Causes of evolutionary    belief)[3] In 2007, \"Discovery    Institute's Center for Science and Culture...announced that    over 700 scientists from around the world have now signed a    statement expressing their skepticism about the contemporary    theory of Darwinian evolution.\"[4]  <\/p>\n<p>    In 2011, the results of a study was published indicating that    most United States high school biology teachers    are reluctant to endorse the theory of evolution in class.    [5] In addition, in 2011, eight    anti-evolution bills were introduced into state legislatures    within the United States encouraging students to employ    critical    thinking skills when examining the evolutionary paradigm. In 2009, there were    seven states which required critical analysis skills be    employed when examining evolutionary material within    schools.[6]  <\/p>\n<p>    A 2005 poll by the Louis Finkelstein Institute for Social and    Religious Research found that 60% of American medical    doctors reject Darwinism, stating that they do not believe man    evolved through natural processes alone.[7]    Thirty-eight percent of the American medical doctors polled    agreed with the statement that \"Humans evolved naturally with    no supernatural involvement.\" [8] The study also    reported that 1\/3 of all medical doctors favor the theory of    intelligent design over    evolution.[9] In 2010, the Gallup organization    reported that 40% of Americans believe in young earth creationism.[10] In January 2006, the BBC reported    concerning Britain:  <\/p>\n<p>          Furthermore, more than 40% of those questioned believe          that creationism or intelligent design (ID)          should be taught in school science lessons.[11]        <\/p>\n<p>    The theory of evolution posits a process of transformation from    simple life forms to more complex life forms, which has never    been observed or duplicated in a laboratory.[12][13] Although not    a creation    scientist, Swedish geneticist Dr. Nils Heribert-Nilsson,    Professor of Botany at the University of Lund in Sweden and a member of the Royal    Swedish Academy of Sciences, stated: \"My attempts to    demonstrate Evolution by an experiment carried on for more than    40 years have completely failed. At least, I should hardly be    accused of having started from a preconceived antievolutionary    standpoint.\"[14][15]  <\/p>\n<p>    The fossil record is often used as evidence in the creation versus evolution    controversy. The fossil record does not support the theory of    evolution and is one of the flaws in the theory of    evolution.[16] In 1981, there were at least a    hundred million fossils that were catalogued and identified in    the world's museums.[17] Despite the    large number of fossils available to scientists in 1981,    evolutionist Mark Ridley, who currently serves as a professor    of zoology at Oxford University, was forced to    confess: \"In any case, no real evolutionist, whether gradualist    or punctuationist, uses the fossil    record as evidence in favour of the theory of evolution as    opposed to special    creation.\"[18]  <\/p>\n<p>    In addition to the evolutionary position lacking evidential    support and being counterevidential, the great intellectuals in    history such as Archimedes, Aristotle, St. Augustine, Francis Bacon,    Isaac Newton,    and Lord Kelvin    did not propose an evolutionary process for a species to    transform into a more complex version. Even after the theory of    evolution was proposed and promoted heavily in England and    Germany, most leading scientists were against the theory of    evolution.[19] The theory of evolution was    published by naturalist Charles Darwin in his    book On The Origin of    Species by Means of Natural Selection or The Preservation of    Favored Races in the Struggle for Life, in 1859. In a    letter to Asa Gray,    Darwin confided: \"...I am quite conscious that my speculations    run quite beyond the bounds of true science.\"[20]Prior to    publishing the book, Darwin wrote in his private notebooks that    he was a materialist, which is a type of atheist.(see: religious views of Charles    Darwin) [21] Charles Darwins casual    mentioning of a creator in earlier editions of The Origin of    Species appears to have been a merely a ploy to downplay the    implications of his materialistic theory.[22] The    amount of credit Darwin actually deserves for the theory is    disputed. [23] Darwin's theory attempted to    explain the origin of the various kinds of plants and animals    via the process of natural selection or \"survival of    the fittest\".  <\/p>\n<p>    The basic principle behind natural selection is that in the    struggle for life some organisms in a given population will be    better suited to their particular environment and thus have a    reproductive advantage which increases the representation of    their particular traits over time. Many years before Charles    Darwin, there were several other individuals who published    articles on the topic of natural selection.[24]  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>More here:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.conservapedia.com\/Evolution\" title=\"Evolution - Main Page - Conservapedia\">Evolution - Main Page - Conservapedia<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> From Conservapedia The theory of evolution is a naturalistic theory of the history of life on earth (this refers to the theory of evolution which employs methodological naturalism and is taught in schools and universities). Merriam-Webster's dictionary gives the following definition of evolution: \"a theory that the various types of animals and plants have their origin in other preexisting types and that the distinguishable differences are due to modifications in successive generations...\"[2] Currently, there are several theories of evolution <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/behavioral-science\/evolution-main-page-conservapedia.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":57,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[577410],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-241357","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-behavioral-science"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/241357"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/57"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=241357"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/241357\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=241357"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=241357"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=241357"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}