{"id":237668,"date":"2017-08-24T04:56:46","date_gmt":"2017-08-24T08:56:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/more-than-600-global-brands-are-advertising-on-fake-news-websitesand-they-dont-seem-to-care-quartz.php"},"modified":"2017-08-24T04:56:46","modified_gmt":"2017-08-24T08:56:46","slug":"more-than-600-global-brands-are-advertising-on-fake-news-websitesand-they-dont-seem-to-care-quartz","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/eco-system\/more-than-600-global-brands-are-advertising-on-fake-news-websitesand-they-dont-seem-to-care-quartz.php","title":{"rendered":"More than 600 global brands are advertising on fake news websitesand they don&#8217;t seem to care &#8211; Quartz"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Storyzys business is alerting brands to their presence on    fake news sites. By and large, the advertising communitys    response is simply appalling.  <\/p>\n<p>    French startup Storyzy    spotted six hundred forty-four brands on questionable sites    ranging from hardcore hyper-partisan fake news sites to    clickbait venues hosting bogus content with no particular    agenda, except making a quick buck.  <\/p>\n<p>    Storyzy showed me the list of brands that fund the fake news    ecosystem, but didnt want Monday Note to publish it. Never    mind. With 600+ advertisers, you can expect many household    names to show up. And they do: tech companies, banks,    retailers, airlines, cosmetic companies, luxury goods    companies, universities, and NGOs. Reputed media brands ended    up on hyper-partisan and fake news sites. As shown below, The    New York Times was spotted on RealtimePolitics and The Wall    Street Journal on Americas Freedom Fighters:  <\/p>\n<p>    While some advertisers know and choose to turn a blind eye,    most of the brands feeding the fake news industry do so    completely unaware of their complicity.  <\/p>\n<p>    In fact, they are caught in a combination of negligence and    greed from media buyers and the cohort of intermediaries that    rule the digital advertising sector.  <\/p>\n<p>    The real surprise comes from the brands reaction once they are    notified. Normally, one would expect most of them to take    radical measures to notify the chain of intermediaries, such as    media buyers or trading desks.  <\/p>\n<p>    To alert advertisers caught on junk or blatant fake news sites,    Storyzy sends them an email with eloquent screenshots attached.  <\/p>\n<p>      We contacted about 400 brands, says Pierre-Albert Ruquier,      marketing director and co-founder of Storyzy. Reaction      varies. Some clearly dont care and dont even bother to      respond. The biggest advertisers usually refer us to their      media buying partners. We talk to most of them, even though      we are often received coldly. Weirdly enough, we are also      sent to large consulting firms that advise big clients on      brand safety issues. The vast majority of advertisers dont      know where their ads land. Or choose to ignore it. Thats why      when they refer us to their media buying agency these wont      budge. The reason is that almost all campaigns are ROI-based,      a field dominated by behavioral targeting and retargeting.    <\/p>\n<p>    In other words: Most of the brands dont really care where    their ads show up as long as the overall return on investment    is fine. One of the worlds largest hotel chains told us they    dont mind showing up on questionable sites if it is the result    of a retargeting process, which is a convenient way to say    that, as long as they can invoke deniability, performance    supersedes any damage caused to the brand, or ethical    considerations such as fueling a vast network of    misinformation. And if by chance the brand does care, they    cant always trust intermediaries whose incentives are tied to    the campaigns financial performance.  <\/p>\n<p>    Such a combination of deniability and greed is toxic. It    explains the millions of dollars that contribute to the    well-being of a fake news\/junk news system, one that needs not    worry about survivability. (Misinformation media are, in    addition, super efficient at maximizing bang for their own    buck: their production costs are but a tiny fraction of those    required for legit sites.)  <\/p>\n<p>    Storyzy derived its current business from expertise in    fact-checking that goes back to 2012. At the time, the startup    was called Trooclick; its goal, using natural language    processing and machine learning algorithms, was detecting false    information in financial news.  <\/p>\n<p>    Five years later, the initial product expanded to a more    general quote verification system called Quote Verifier.  <\/p>\n<p>    Currently, the service is available via a paid-for API (access    to the web site, however, is free). This function is at the    core of the companys fake news detection.  <\/p>\n<p>    According to Ramon Ruti, CTO and co-founder of Storyzy,    extracting quotes in a reliable fashionand being able to find    and properly attribute indirect quotesis complex and requires    layers of techniques: sentence splitting to detect misleading    sentences boundaries like in certain acronyms; morphosyntactic    analysis, to understand the nature of each word; topic and    named entities extraction; reported speech extraction, for both    direct and indirect speech; and other tweaks to deal with    language ambiguity and newswriting imprecision.  <\/p>\n<p>    Each day, Storyzy collects and sorts 50,000 new quotes in    English lifted from 5,000 trusted and untrusted sources. The    quote is a quintessential element of journalismespecially in    the Anglo-Saxon world. Quotes are also the most often forged    and the most hijacked items used by fake news sites. Even if a    fake quote can be debunked in a matter of hours, the delay is    largely sufficient for broad viral propagation on social nets.    Hence the utility of the quote verifier to quickly pinpoint    false information. Combined with other signals, it proves    quite effective at fingering fake news sites.  <\/p>\n<p>    Quotes also have great value for documentation purposes.    Storyzy is currently building a private website for a global    media brand to be used by journalists, fact-checkers, and    moderators who will verify quotes, attribution, and context;    the service will be plugged on the publishers CMS to warrant    the accuracy of archived quotes.  <\/p>\n<p>    For its brand safety-related business, Storyzy is just warming    up. A few months ago, the company started to provide a list of    750 questionable websites to its customers, and more bad sites    are added at a rate of 20~30 a month. Storyzy is also working    on a full monitoring service to ensure brand safetyfor those    who are interested.  <\/p>\n<p>    Careless advertisers and media buyerss are actually harmful to    everybody:  <\/p>\n<p>    This post originally appeared at     Monday Note. Learn how to     write for Quartz Ideas. We welcome your comments at    <a href=\"mailto:ideas@qz.com\">ideas@qz.com<\/a>.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Visit link: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/qz.com\/1059158\/more-than-600-global-brands-still-feed-the-fake-news-ecosystem-and-they-dont-seem-to-care\/\" title=\"More than 600 global brands are advertising on fake news websitesand they don't seem to care - Quartz\">More than 600 global brands are advertising on fake news websitesand they don't seem to care - Quartz<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Storyzys business is alerting brands to their presence on fake news sites. By and large, the advertising communitys response is simply appalling. French startup Storyzy spotted six hundred forty-four brands on questionable sites ranging from hardcore hyper-partisan fake news sites to clickbait venues hosting bogus content with no particular agenda, except making a quick buck <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/eco-system\/more-than-600-global-brands-are-advertising-on-fake-news-websitesand-they-dont-seem-to-care-quartz.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[33],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-237668","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-eco-system"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/237668"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=237668"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/237668\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=237668"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=237668"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=237668"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}