\"In [1492], if you were going to bet on who was going to have a 'Great Enrichment,'\" says University of Illinois at Chicago economist Deirdre McCloskey, \"you would have been crazy not to bet on China because China had the most advanced commercial institutions, the most advanced ship building technology, [and] the most advanced machinery all together.\" But it didn't work out that way. <\/p>\n
\"My claim,\" McCloskey says, \"is that liberty was the key to modern economic growth.\" <\/p>\n
In her new book, Bourgeois Equality: How Ideas, Not Capital or Institutions, Enriched the World, the third volume in a trilogy, McCloskey argues that our vast accumulation of wealth over the past two hundred years which she's dubbed \"The Great Enrichment\"was the result of \"massively better ideas in technology and institutions.\" Where did they arise from? &tag=reasonmagazineA\"A new liberty and dignity for commoners,\" she argues, \"expressed as the ideology of European liberalism.\" <\/p>\n
McCloskey sat down with Nick Gillespie at Freedom Fest, the annual convention for libertarians in Las Vegas, for a wide-ranging conversation on topics including the roots of \"The Great Enrichment,\" why her gender reassignment surgery was an \"expression of [her] libertarianism\", and the importance of advocating policies that \"actually help the poor\" instead of just \"making people feel good about helping the poor. <\/p>\n
McCloskey is also a Reason columnist. Her archive is here. <\/p>\n
Edited by Todd Krainin. Cameras by Meredith Bragg and Justin Monticello. <\/p>\n
Subscribe to our YouTube channel. <\/p>\n
Like us on Facebook. <\/p>\n
Follow us on Twitter. <\/p>\n
Subscribe to our podcast at iTunes. <\/p>\n
This is a rush transcriptcheck all quotes against the audio for accuracy. <\/p>\n
Nick Gillespie: Hi, I'm Nick Gillespie with Reason and today we are sitting down with Deirdre McCloskey. She's an Emeritus Professor of Economics, History, English, and Communication at the University of Illinois at Chicago and the author most recently of Bourgeois Equality: How Ideas, Not Capital or Institutions, Enriched the World. She's also a columnist for Reason Magazine. Deirdre, thanks so much for talking with us. Long time contributing editor to Reason as well. <\/p>\n
McCloskey: I'm extremely pleased to be here and ... <\/p>\n
Gillespie: Well, your latest column, because I think this puts us right into a lot of current discussions, is titled The Myth of Technological Unemployment. <\/p>\n
McCloskey: Yeah. <\/p>\n
Gillespie: The subhead is, if the nightmare of technological unemployment were true, it would have already happened repeatedly and massively. In it, you take issue with a lot of libertarian or free-market economists who are talking about how we've reached the end of technological innovation or productivity growth and yeah, we're going to have to find something to do for people who are replaced by robots. <\/p>\n
McCloskey: Yeah. <\/p>\n
Gillespie: What's wrong with that? <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Read more from the original source:<\/p>\n
How Freedom Made Us Rich - Reason.com - Reason (blog)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \"In [1492], if you were going to bet on who was going to have a 'Great Enrichment,'\" says University of Illinois at Chicago economist Deirdre McCloskey, \"you would have been crazy not to bet on China because China had the most advanced commercial institutions, the most advanced ship building technology, [and] the most advanced machinery all together.\" But it didn't work out that way. Continue reading