{"id":233254,"date":"2017-08-07T17:26:05","date_gmt":"2017-08-07T21:26:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/apple-needs-micron-technology-seeking-alpha.php"},"modified":"2017-08-07T17:26:05","modified_gmt":"2017-08-07T21:26:05","slug":"apple-needs-micron-technology-seeking-alpha","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/technology\/apple-needs-micron-technology-seeking-alpha.php","title":{"rendered":"Apple Needs Micron Technology &#8211; Seeking Alpha"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      The NAND landscape. Apple (AAPL) has constantly been suing Samsung      (OTC:SSNLF), the      largest producer of NAND memory in the world. And Apple also      is a customer of Samsung for NAND. Apple has also been a      customer of Toshiba (OTCPK:TOSBF),      which can't accomplish its spin off of its memory unit and is      in full on litigation with its joint venture partner Western      Digital (WDC). The future of      Toshiba's Fab 6 which would make the next generation of      memory is entirely unclear. And then there is SKHynix      (OTC:HXSCF) which      is only now ramping to a 48 layer 3DNAND while its      competitors are all in full production with 64 layer product.    <\/p>\n<p>      And finally there is Micron Technology (MU) trading at a paltry 5x      forward, and 12x trailing, PE. Micron has the most dense 3D      memory chip available which gives it a cost advantage and      should give customers concerned about critical real estate,      like the inside of a smartphone, a space advantage.    <\/p>\n<p>      So what is Apple to do? Right now things in      the Micron part of the memory market should look invitingly      calm if you are a massive consumer like Apple. They have no      IP lawsuits with you. They aren't in litigation with a JV      partner. And they are a leader, at present, in terms of      technology.    <\/p>\n<p>      Apple should consider:    <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      Tim and Donald discussing tax on repatriation of foreign      cash?    <\/p>\n<p>      Why should Apple bother? Many of us learned      about Micron from articles here by the great Russ Fischer.      Russ wrote in 2013 that       Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) should acquire Micron. I wrote      a rejoinder in November 2013 that       perhaps Apple should acquire Micron. So far we are both      wrong. (Be charitable. Call one of us early.) After making      many millions of dollars for faithful Seeking Alpha readers,      Russ suffered a major stroke. He is recovering and I hope I      don't set him back to say that I still think Apple is the      more logical buyer. Who knows? Maybe one day one of us could      be correct.    <\/p>\n<p>      Russ was great at boiling complicated stuff down so us mere      mortals could understand it. Let me try to channel my muse      here.    <\/p>\n<p>      First, pretend you are buying an iPhone. Go to the Apple      store and see that an upgrade from 128GB of NAND on an      iPhone 7 is priced at $100. Next, wander over to inSpectrum to see what Apple might be paying      to fulfill your upgrade. Scroll on down to the 128Gb chips      and multiply by 8 to get 128GB for your upgrade. On August 6      as I was writing this, the spot price for the 128Gb TLC chip      was $4.70. And so 8 of these would cost $37.60. Of course      Apple doesn't pay spot and presumably they get a pretty sweet      contract price. They also are presumably still buying whole      wafers and are sawing them down, testing them, and packaging      themselves achieving an even better cost. But let's just call      it a $62 margin on your $100 upgrade to keep the math      simpler. This is way down from a 92% margin Apple was getting      on a 16GB upgrade when I wrote my       November 2013 article. Maybe IDTT (It's Different This      Time)?    <\/p>\n<p>      Now humor Toni Sacconaghi of Bernstein who has just written      that he thinks Apple will sell 251,069,000 iPhones in 2018.      Gee, lets assume that there is a memory shortage and Apple is      only able to get enough memory for a base model phone (128GB      in the case of the iPhone 7 on the Apple store site linked      above). OK maybe they scrounge up enough NAND for a few      upgrades but 100 million upgrades are foregone since Apple's      Tim Cook (Apple CEO and supply chain czar) is margin      sensitive. Hmmm, 100 million phones that don't generate a $62      margin on this memory upgrade. Why that would be $6.2 billion      in foregone gross profit! And if you rattle down through      Toni's model, this might mean a decrease in Apple's earnings      per share of around 50 cents. And then multiplying by a      17.79x PE according to Google finance, etc. etc.    <\/p>\n<p>      Conclusions: There are lots of other      reasons, besides the iPhone memory upgrade example, for Apple      to cozy up to Micron. Toni Sacconaghi also thinks Apple will      sell 39.6 million iPads, 19 million MACs, and 14.4 million      watches in 2018. All of these consume NAND. They also consume      Micron's primary product line of DRAM.    <\/p>\n<p>      Beyond NAND and DRAM Micron could help Apple's ambitions with      new memory types and artificial intelligence. The      Micron\/Intel jointly developed 3DXpoint memory comes to mind      with regard to new memory. I would steer readers to Stephen      Breezy's wonderful first article on SA       \"The iPhone 5 Technology Rabbit Hole.\" He was writing      about phase change memory and the days of run time life it      could give an iPhone. Of course it didn't happen in the      iPhone 5 and hasn't appeared in subsequent models. But PCM is      at the heart of 3DXpoint. A Micron controlled, or buddied up      to, by Apple might yet see such an implementation.    <\/p>\n<p>      On the AI side, one needs look no further than Micron's      supply of advanced DRAM to Nvidia (NVDA) for its GPU's.    <\/p>\n<p>      Naysayers will point out that Apple hasn't bought anything      larger than its Beats headphone company. They should.      Naysayers will suggest that it wouldn't work for Apple to      sell memory that it doesn't need to competitors. Nonsense!      This is what Samsung does every day of the week, including to      a competitor named Apple.    <\/p>\n<p>      Russ Fischer is doing a little better. He isn't hunched over      a computer reading Seeking Alpha or comments to articles but      we make sure he hears those of interest. When I last spoke      with him, he was scheming about buying a Ford truck, racing      watercraft with his son again, and journeying to Seattle. I      can't wait to see him turn his nurses into millionaires with      some of his trading ideas. Nice to see that a fellow going      through what he is, and what he has gone through, is still      developing a bucket list.    <\/p>\n<p>    Disclosure: I am\/we are long MU, INTC.  <\/p>\n<p>    I wrote this article myself,    and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving    compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no    business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned    in this article.  <\/p>\n<p>    Editor's Note: This article discusses one or more securities    that do not trade on a major U.S. exchange. Please be aware of    the risks associated with these stocks.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/seekingalpha.com\/article\/4095877-apple-needs-micron-technology\" title=\"Apple Needs Micron Technology - Seeking Alpha\">Apple Needs Micron Technology - Seeking Alpha<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The NAND landscape. Apple (AAPL) has constantly been suing Samsung (OTC:SSNLF), the largest producer of NAND memory in the world. And Apple also is a customer of Samsung for NAND <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/technology\/apple-needs-micron-technology-seeking-alpha.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[431576],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-233254","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-technology"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233254"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=233254"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233254\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=233254"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=233254"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=233254"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}