{"id":232459,"date":"2017-08-04T13:15:15","date_gmt":"2017-08-04T17:15:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/the-19th-century-moral-panic-over-paper-technology-slate-magazine.php"},"modified":"2017-08-04T13:15:15","modified_gmt":"2017-08-04T17:15:15","slug":"the-19th-century-moral-panic-over-paper-technology-slate-magazine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/technology\/the-19th-century-moral-panic-over-paper-technology-slate-magazine.php","title":{"rendered":"The 19th Century Moral Panic Over  Paper Technology &#8211; Slate Magazine"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Black      Bess; or The Knight of the Road, aromanticized tale of      Dick Turpin.      <\/p>\n<p>        Edward Viles, Wikipedia.      <\/p>\n<p>      In the history of information technologies, Gutenberg and his      printing press are (understandably) treated with the kind of      reverence even the most celebrated of modern tech tycoons      could only imagine. So perhaps it will come as a surprise      that Europes literacy rates remained fairly stagnant for      centuries after printing presses, originally invented in      about 1440, started popping up in major cities across the      continent. Progress was inconsistent and unreliable, with            literacy rates booming through the 16th      century and then stagnating, even declining, across most of      Western Europe. Great Britain, France, Belgium, Switzerland,      and Italy all       produced more printed books per capita in 16511700 than      in 17011750.    <\/p>\n<p>      Then came the early 19th century, which saw            enormous      changes in the manufacture of paper and       improvements      on the printing press. These changes both contributed to      and resulted from major societal changes, such as the            worldwide growth increase in formal education. There were      more books than ever and more people who could read them. For      some, this looked less like progress and more like a      dangerous and destabilizing trend that could threaten not      just literature, but the solvency of civilization itself.    <\/p>\n<p>      The real price      of books plummeted by more than 60 percent between 1460      and 1500: A book composed of       500 folio pages could sell for as much as 30 florins in      1422 in Austriaa       huge amount of money at the timebut by the 1470s, a      500-folio book would fetch something in the       neighborhood of 10 florins. There were even books on the      market that sold for as little as 2 or 3 florins. In 1498, a      Bible composed of over       2,000 folio pages sold for 6 florins. Costs continued to      decline, albeit at a much slower rate, over the next three      centuries. As a result, books were no longer reserved only      for the clergy or for kings: Owning a printed Bible or book      of hours became a       coveted status symbol for the emerging class of      moderately wealthy merchants and magnates.    <\/p>\n<p>      Books remained, however, far outside the range of the common      man or woman, until the price plummeted once again in the      19th century. No longer was literacy necessarily a      signifier of wealth, class, and status. This abrupt change      created a moral panic as members of the traditional reading      classes argued over who had the right to informationand what      kind of information ought to be available at all.    <\/p>\n<p>      The shift happened thanks to major developments in both      printing and paper technology. The       printing press had not changed much between 1455, when      Gutenberg printed his famous Bible, and 1800: The letters had      to be hand-placed in a matrix, coated with a special ink that      transferred more cleanly from tile to pageanother of      Gutenbergs inventionsand pressed one-by-one onto the pages.      The first major change to this tried-and-tested design came      with Friedrich Koenigs mechanized press in 1812, which could      make       400 impressions per hour, compared to the       200 impressions per hour allegedly accomplished by      printers in Frankfurt, Germany, in the second half of the      16th century. In 1844, American inventor Richard      March Hoe first deployed his       rotary press, which could print 8,000 pages in a single      hour.    <\/p>\n<p>      Naturally, faster prints drove up demand for paper, and soon      traditional methods of paper production couldnt keep up. The      paper machine,       invented      in France in 1799 at the Didot familys paper mill, could      make       40      times as much paper per day as the traditional method,      which involved pounding rags into pulp by hand using a mortar      and pestle. By 1825, 50 percent of Englands paper supply was      produced by machines. As the stock of rags for papermaking      grew smaller and smaller, papermakers began experimenting      with other materials such as       grass,      silk, asparagus, manure, stone, and even hornets nests.      In 1800, the Marquess of Salisbury gifted to King George III      a book printed on the first useful Paper manufactured solely      from Straw to       demonstrate      the viability of the material as an alternative for rags,      which were already in extraordinary scarcity in Europe. In      1831, a member of the Agricultural and Horticultural Society      of India tried to       convince      the East India Company that Nepalese ash-based paper      ought to be generally substituted for the flimsy friable      English paper to which we commit all our records.    <\/p>\n<p>      One newspaper was so unsatisfied with the quality of its      straw paper that it apologized to readers.    <\/p>\n<p>      By the 1860s, there was a decent alternative: wood-pulp      paper. Today, wood-pulp paper accounts for 37 percent      of all paper produced in the world (with an additional 55      percent from recycled wood pulp), but when it was introduced,      the prospect of a respectable publication using wood-pulp      paper was practically unthinkablehence pulp      fiction, the early 19th-century literary      snobs preferred way to insult a work as simultaneously      nondescript and sensational.    <\/p>\n<p>      The problem with wood-pulp paper was its       acidity      and short cellulose chains, which made it liable to slow      dissolution over decades. It couldnt be used for a      fine-looking book that could be passed through a family as an      heirloom: It neither looked the part, nor could it survive      the generations.    <\/p>\n<p>      Traditional rag paper, on the other hand, was smooth, easy to      write on, foldable, and could be       preserved for centuries. Paper made from nontraditional      materials, especially wood pulp, was       acidic and rough. (Paper from straw, which enjoyed brief      popularity in 1829 thanks to the chance invention of a      Pennsylvania farmer, is durable,       but      brittle and yellowed. One newspaper was so       unsatisfied      with the quality of its straw paper that it apologized to      readers.)    <\/p>\n<p>      Wood pulp or straw, the cheap paper used in mass-market books      sold at extremely low prices. There were a few different      kinds of these books, all with descriptive (and usually      pejorative) names: the penny dreadfuls (gothic-inspired tales      sold for a penny each), pulp magazines (named after the      wood-pulp paper of which they were composed), yellowbacks      (cheap books bound using yellow strawboard, which is then      covered with a paper slip in yellow glaze), and others. The      cheapness that had made them so unsuitable for fine books and      government records made them excellent fodder for      experimental, unusual, and controversial literary      developments.    <\/p>\n<p>      Detractors delighted in linking       the volatile matter of wood-pulp paper with the      volatile minds of pulp readers. Londoner W. Coldwell wrote      a three-part diatribe, On Reading, lamenting that       the noble art of printing should be pressed into this      ignoble service. Samuel Taylor Coleridge       mourned how books, once revered as religious oracles       degaded into culprits as they became more widely available.    <\/p>\n<p>      By the end of the century there was growing      concernespecially among middle class parentsthat these      cheap, plentiful books were       seducing            children      into a life of       crime      and violence. The books were even blamed for a handful of      murders and       suicides            committed      by young boys. Perpetrators of crimes whose misdoings were      linked to their fondness for penny dreadfuls were often            referred      to in the newspapers as victims of the books. In the      United States, dime novels (which      usually cost a nickel) were given the same treatment.      Newspapers reported that Jesse Pomeroy, a teenage serial      killer who targeted other children, was        a      close reader of dime novels and yellow covered literature      [yellowbacks], until, as was argued in his trial, his      brain was turned, and his highest ambition was to emulate      the violent dime novel character Texas Jack. Moralizers      painted the books as no better than printed      poison, with headlines warning readers that Pomeroys      brutality was what      came of reading dime novels. Others hoped that by      providing alternativespenny delightfuls or penny      popularsthey could curb the demand for the sensational      literature.       A      letter to the editor to the       Worcester Talisman from the late 1820s tells      young people to stop reading novels and read books of      substance: [F]ar better were it for a person to confine      himself to the plain sober facts recorded in history and the      lives of eminent individuals, than to wander through the      flowery pages of fiction.    <\/p>\n<p>      These books represent the beginnings of modern mass media. At      the confluence of increasing literacy rates and ever-growing      urban populations looking for recreation, cheap imprints      flourished. But it wasnt just social change driving the book      boom: It was technological change as well. In 1884, Simon      Newton Dexter North, who would later become superintendent of      the Census Bureau,       wrote in his       intensive study of the 10th census that the      chief cause for the reduction in the price of paper is      the successful useof wood pulp.    <\/p>\n<p>      For a material meant to be transient, wood-pulp paper has      left its mark and the world. Forests have shrunk while      literacy rates have soared, and today the       hunt is on for wood pulps replacement. We are living in      the ironic epilogue to a triumph of a hard-won Victorian-era      innovation. Wood pulp paper took on a life of its own as soon      as it hit the presses, and it demonstrates to a modern      audience the crucial lesson that the impact of a technology      goes beyond what it does: what it is made of, who uses it,      who doesnt use it, and what it represents to the      people who buy it.    <\/p>\n<p>      This article is part of Future      Tense, a collaboration among Arizona State      University, New America,      and Slate. Future Tense      explores the ways emerging technologies affect society,      policy, and culture. To read more, follow us on      Twitter and sign up for      our weekly newsletter.    <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/articles\/technology\/future_tense\/2017\/08\/the_19th_century_moral_panic_over_paper_technology.html\" title=\"The 19th Century Moral Panic Over  Paper Technology - Slate Magazine\">The 19th Century Moral Panic Over  Paper Technology - Slate Magazine<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Black Bess; or The Knight of the Road, aromanticized tale of Dick Turpin. Edward Viles, Wikipedia. In the history of information technologies, Gutenberg and his printing press are (understandably) treated with the kind of reverence even the most celebrated of modern tech tycoons could only imagine.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/technology\/the-19th-century-moral-panic-over-paper-technology-slate-magazine.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[431576],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-232459","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-technology"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232459"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=232459"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232459\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=232459"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=232459"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=232459"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}