Human genetic engineering is moving forward exponentially and we are still not having any meaningful societal, regulatory, or legislative conversations about whether, how, and to what extent we should permit the human genome to be altered in ways that flow down the generations. <\/p>\n
But dont worry. The scientists assure us, when that can be done, there will (somehow) beSTRICT OVERSIGHT From the AP story: <\/p>\n
And lots more research is needed to tell if its really safe, added Britains Lovell-Badge. He and Kahn were part of a National Academy of Sciences report earlier this year that said if germline editing ever were allowed, it should be only for serious diseases with no good alternatives and done with strict oversight. <\/p>\n
Please!No more! When I laugh this hard it makes mystomach hurt. <\/p>\n
Heres the problem: Strict guidelines rarely are strict and the almost never permanently protect. Theyare ignored, unenforced, or stretched over time until they, essentially, cease to exist. <\/p>\n
Thats awful with actions such as euthanasia. But wecant let that kind of pretense rule the day withtechnologies that could prove to be among themost powerful and potentially destructive inventions in human history. Indeed, other than nuclear weapons, I cant think of a technology with more destructive potential. <\/p>\n
Strict oversight will have to include legal limitations and clear boundaries, enforced bystiff criminalpenalties, civil remedies, and international protocols. <\/p>\n
They wont be easy to craft and it will take significant time to work through all of the scientific and ethical conundrums. <\/p>\n
But we havent made a beginning. If we wait until what may be able to be done actually can be done, it will be too late. <\/p>\n
Wheres the leadership? All we have now is drift. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Link: <\/p>\n
Genetic Engineering with 'Strict Guidelines?' Ha! - National Review<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Human genetic engineering is moving forward exponentially and we are still not having any meaningful societal, regulatory, or legislative conversations about whether, how, and to what extent we should permit the human genome to be altered in ways that flow down the generations. But dont worry. The scientists assure us, when that can be done, there will (somehow) beSTRICT OVERSIGHT From the AP story: And lots more research is needed to tell if its really safe, added Britains Lovell-Badge. Continue reading