{"id":231681,"date":"2017-08-01T07:23:25","date_gmt":"2017-08-01T11:23:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/leveraging-the-power-of-black-women-center-for-american-progress-center-for-american-progress.php"},"modified":"2017-08-01T07:23:25","modified_gmt":"2017-08-01T11:23:25","slug":"leveraging-the-power-of-black-women-center-for-american-progress-center-for-american-progress","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/progress\/leveraging-the-power-of-black-women-center-for-american-progress-center-for-american-progress.php","title":{"rendered":"Leveraging the Power of Black Women &#8211; Center for American Progress &#8211; Center For American Progress"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    On the eve of the 2016 presidential election, pundits and    political watchers opined on whether the Obama coalitionthe    multiracial, multiethnic, cross-class coalition made up of    African Americans,Latinos, women, young people,    professionals, and economically populist blue-collar    whiteswould onceagain come together to elect the first    female president in U.S. history. As the results began to    crystalize that the pursuit of the highest, hardest glass    ceiling for women had yet to be shattered, the    assessmentof what happened predictably focused on the    preferences and attitudes of one segment of the    coalition:the white, mostly male, working-class voters    who stayed home or voted for the other candidate.  <\/p>\n<p>    Inspecting the lives of so-called Obama-Trump votersreferring    mostly to the white voters who supported former President    Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012 and voted for President Donald    Trump in 2016took center stage.The perceived anger and    neglect of these voters emerged as the primary thesis of the    2016 post-election assessment. Very little analysis focused on    another important side of the equation: the decreased turnout    rates among African Americans, specifically African American    women, the     most consistent and traditionally reliable block of Obama    supporters.In 2012,     36 percent of blue-collar white voters voted for Obama,    compared with more than     95 percent of black female voters.  <\/p>\n<p>    While gaining a clear understanding of the 2016 election    results requires a thorough examination of each facet of the    Obama coalition, taking a closer look at its most reliable    membersblack womenis critical.  <\/p>\n<p>    Black women are a powerful force in the American political    system. In 2008 and 2012, they     turned out to vote at higher rates than any other    demographic group, playing a decisive role ushering in new    candidates across the country.Black womens civic    participation embodies the stated ideals of the nations    participatory democracy: They consistently recognize and value    the importance of being politically active and engaged in order    to effect change in their communities.At the same time,    the civic engagement of black women too often does not result    in concrete policy changes that are responsive to their    needs.While black women are always expected to turn out    and provide support, the public narrative about womenand more    importantly about what women needfrequently focuses on white    women, typically those with economic resources.  <\/p>\n<p>    The unique experiences and challenges of black women, shaped by    the intersection of race and gender, are commonly overlooked,    rarely prioritized, and effectively rendered invisible. Thus,    black women are still shockingly underrepresented in critical    positions of power and influencewhere decisions are made about    which problems are addressed, which policies are adopted, and    which communities are served.In 2016, black women        gained 14 state legislative seats and constituted 20    percent of the freshmen women in Congress. While they have    overcome systemic barriers and gained ground every political    cycle, their representation still lags woefully    behind:Black women comprise 7 percent of the U.S.    population, yet just 5 percent of     federal judges, 4 percent of mayors    in the nations 100 largest cities,and 3 percent of    members of    Congress and state    legislators.  <\/p>\n<p>    In 2016, pundits and political strategists     expected black women to continue their historical trends by    voting in large numbers. They gave little attention to the    persistent underrepresentation and long-standing disparities    that have limited black womens opportunities, economic    stability, and overall well-being. Nor was there a focused    public conversation about the need to engage black women voters    directly with a targeted message that put forth specific    policies to improve their everyday lives. To the surprise of    these experts, turnout among black women plummeted from        more than 70 percent to just 64 percent. Although black    women still outperformed almost all other voters, with their    turnout percentage slightly behind the turnout of white women,    the decline was dramatic andin some instancespivotal.  <\/p>\n<p>    A key takeaway from the election results is that lawmakers    seeking the support of black women cannot afford to take them    for granted. Lawmakers must be proactive and intentional to    understand and address the challenges that black women face,    including the barriers and biases that limit their    opportunities and the disparities they experience in local    communities. Policymakers must develop constructive solutions    to address such concerns, in order to improve the status of    black women and advance policies that promote stability,    opportunity, and prosperity across the nation.  <\/p>\n<p>    The critical issues that black women must overcome are    wide-ranging, from a lack of economic opportunity to inadequate    access to health care,     housing,     education, and     criminal justice. For example, black women continue to face    an appalling and exploitive     wage gap that perpetuates poverty and stifles economic    mobility. On average, they earn 34 percent less than white men    with the same education, experience, marital status, and region    of residence. One     study found that when women enter traditionally    male-dominated fields, the average pay for those occupations    declines, even after controlling for education, work    experience, and geography. Furthermore, black women suffer from    a range of health disparities, including high rates of     asthma, fibroids,    and     breast and cervical    cancer mortality. Despite these systemic and often    intergenerational challenges, black women continue to    demonstrate a greater     trust in government and belief in its potential to serve as    a catalyst for upward mobility than other demographic groups.  <\/p>\n<p>    Unfortunately, voter suppression and     deceptive practices are also a persistent and familiar    theme in American democracy, which disproportionately affects    black women who participate in elections. In 2012, black women        reported transportation challenges, inconvenient polling    places, long lines, and voter ID requirements as barriers to    voting. These problems persisted and expanded ahead of the 2016    election. By November, 17 states     adopted new voting restrictions, such as strict voter ID    requirements and reduced early voting opportunities. While some    of these laws were struck down for unconstitutionally targeting    people of color, 14 were still in place on Election Day.  <\/p>\n<p>    At the root of these problems is a     fundamental resistance to discussing race and genderand    their unique intersectionsdirectly, as well as a failure to    address     persistent and poisonous narratives about black women,    race, and class. To develop truly responsive policies and    protect against voter suppression, policymakers must confront    each of these issues head-on. We must recognize and reconcile    our biases, working across our divisions to create policies    that benefit historically oppressed communities. This, along    with meaningful conversations about empowering black women and    leveraging that power, will ensure that the future of the    United States is fairer and more prosperous for all.  <\/p>\n<p>    Jocelyn Frye is a senior fellow at the Center for American    Progress. Michele Jawando is the vice president of Legal    Progress at the Center.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>View post: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.americanprogress.org\/issues\/women\/news\/2017\/07\/31\/436903\/leveraging-power-black-women\/\" title=\"Leveraging the Power of Black Women - Center for American Progress - Center For American Progress\">Leveraging the Power of Black Women - Center for American Progress - Center For American Progress<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> On the eve of the 2016 presidential election, pundits and political watchers opined on whether the Obama coalitionthe multiracial, multiethnic, cross-class coalition made up of African Americans,Latinos, women, young people, professionals, and economically populist blue-collar whiteswould onceagain come together to elect the first female president in U.S. history. As the results began to crystalize that the pursuit of the highest, hardest glass ceiling for women had yet to be shattered, the assessmentof what happened predictably focused on the preferences and attitudes of one segment of the coalition:the white, mostly male, working-class voters who stayed home or voted for the other candidate.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/progress\/leveraging-the-power-of-black-women-center-for-american-progress-center-for-american-progress.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[431575],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-231681","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-progress"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231681"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=231681"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231681\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=231681"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=231681"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=231681"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}