{"id":231230,"date":"2017-07-29T18:16:01","date_gmt":"2017-07-29T22:16:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/the-wrong-way-to-preserve-free-speech-on-campus-thehill-the-hill-blog.php"},"modified":"2017-07-29T18:16:01","modified_gmt":"2017-07-29T22:16:01","slug":"the-wrong-way-to-preserve-free-speech-on-campus-thehill-the-hill-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/free-speech\/the-wrong-way-to-preserve-free-speech-on-campus-thehill-the-hill-blog.php","title":{"rendered":"The wrong way to preserve free speech on campus | TheHill &#8211; The Hill (blog)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Americans are fighting a new war on college campuses  this    time over free speech  and no one is winning.  <\/p>\n<p>    On the left, aggressive protesters have silenced speeches    by conservative thinkers, using intolerance to demand    tolerance. On the right, conservatives condemn the suppression    of free speech with equally ill-conceived tactics. A    recent model policy    from the Goldwater Institute urges state    legislators to not only intervene in the campus disciplinary    process for public universities but also mandate punishments,    such as one-year suspensions or even expulsions for any student    twice found responsible for infringing the expressive rights    of others.  <\/p>\n<p>    ProfessorWatchlist.org,    launched in November of 2016 by Turning Point USA, lists close    to 200 instructors who, it maintains, advance a radical agenda    in lecture halls. At Cornell University, a conservative    measure to increase ideological diversity by mandating hiring    practices was defeated by one    vote in the student assembly in February.  <\/p>\n<p>    We can do better than this. Protecting free speech and    academic freedom is not a liberal or conservative issue. Its    an American issue. And its a problem we must solve together.    For colleges and universities, this requires policy changes    (e.g., eliminating censorship codes) as well as cultural    changes (i.e., convincing more members of the campus community,    from faculty to students to administrators, that free speech    and open discussion is not only desirable, but worth    defending).  <\/p>\n<p>    According to the Foundation for Individual Rights in    Education (FIRE), at least 42    colleges and universities withdrew invitations    to controversial speakers in 2016  double the number that were    withdrawn in 2015. FIREs research also shows that    40 percent    of U.S. colleges and universities have speech codes, or    regulations that prohibit expression normally protected by the    First Amendment.  <\/p>\n<p>    This goes on all over the country on campuses, Bill    Maher recently commented, criticizing his fellow liberals for    preventing Ann Coulter from speaking at Berkeley. I feel like    this is the liberals version of book burning. And its got to    stop.  <\/p>\n<p>    Some institutions and academics are responding to the    challenge. In May, Middlebury College disciplined 67    students for their role in suppressing a speech by author    Charles Murray (although none of the students was suspended or    expelled). Ideological opposites Cornel West and Robert George,    both professors at Princeton, issued a joint    statement after the Middlebury incident,    supporting truth seeking, democracy, and freedom of thought    and expression. The Association for Governing Boards, an    organization that advises boards of trustees, strongly endorsed    free expression and tolerance in its recent statement on    Campus Climate,    Inclusion, and Civility.  <\/p>\n<p>    Yet there are still challenges to overcome at other    campuses. Recently, campus police couldnt guarantee Professor    Bret Weinsteins safety at Evergreen State    College after he raised concerns and asked for    discussion around a day of absence officially sanctioned by    the school. The students protesting and threatening Weinstein,    however, were given an audience with their colleges president.    Meanwhile, conservative lawmakers, in misguided attempts to    curtail censorship, are responding with calls to eliminate    federal funding for schools that restrict speech.  <\/p>\n<p>    At their best, college campuses are safe havens for    intellectual freedom  places to confront and explore our    differences and learn from the interactions. At their worst,    they can become battlegrounds where political tribes fight for    territory. Publicly shaming speakers on ideological    grounds or targeting professors based on their political    affiliation does not challenge their ideas. By unleashing    politically motivated bullying, from the left or the right, the    nation takes an intellectual risk that imagination will be    replaced by fear, innovation by intimidation.  <\/p>\n<p>    Free speech is a shared American value. Protecting it    requires forming unlikely allies not unnecessary enemies. Our    uncivil war needs to end.  <\/p>\n<p>    Sarah Ruger directs the Charles Koch Institutes free    expression initiatives.  <\/p>\n<p>    The views expressed by contributors are their own and    are not the views of The Hill.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the article here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/blogs\/pundits-blog\/civil-rights\/344442-the-wrong-way-to-preserve-free-speech-on-campus\" title=\"The wrong way to preserve free speech on campus | TheHill - The Hill (blog)\">The wrong way to preserve free speech on campus | TheHill - The Hill (blog)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Americans are fighting a new war on college campuses this time over free speech and no one is winning.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/free-speech\/the-wrong-way-to-preserve-free-speech-on-campus-thehill-the-hill-blog.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[388392],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-231230","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-free-speech"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231230"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=231230"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231230\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=231230"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=231230"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=231230"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}