{"id":230717,"date":"2017-07-27T17:10:42","date_gmt":"2017-07-27T21:10:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/us-district-judge-rules-randall-violated-lansdowne-residents-first-amendment-right-loudoun-times-mirror.php"},"modified":"2017-07-27T17:10:42","modified_gmt":"2017-07-27T21:10:42","slug":"us-district-judge-rules-randall-violated-lansdowne-residents-first-amendment-right-loudoun-times-mirror","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/first-amendment-2\/us-district-judge-rules-randall-violated-lansdowne-residents-first-amendment-right-loudoun-times-mirror.php","title":{"rendered":"US District judge rules Randall violated Lansdowne resident&#8217;s First Amendment right &#8211; Loudoun Times-Mirror"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Loudoun County Chairwoman Phyllis Randall (D-At Large) acted  under the color of state law in maintaining her Chair Phyllis  J. Randall Facebook page and banning Lansdowne resident Brian  Davison from the page overnight, yet Randall violated Davison's  First Amendment right under the U.S. and Virginia constitutions  in doing so, U.S. District Judge James C. Cacheris has ruled in a  complex case about free speech in the digital age.  <\/p>\n<p>    Over the last two years, Davison has filed three separate civil    rights lawsuits against the Loudoun Board of Supervisors and    Randall, Commonwealths Attorney Jim Plowman (R) and the    Loudoun County School Board for either blocking him from their    Facebook pages or deleting critical comments he posted.  <\/p>\n<p>    Last February, Davison was blocked from Randalls Facebook page    for roughly eight hours overnight after the Lansdowne resident    made critical comments of the Loudoun County School Board and    members of their family.  <\/p>\n<p>    Randall said she blocked the comment specifically because of    references Davison made about family members of School Board    representatives.  <\/p>\n<p>    But the next morning, Randall said she decided to unblock    Davison and says she has not blocked him or deleted any    comments from him or any other person since that time.  <\/p>\n<p>    Judge Cacheris, in a ruling today, stated that although    Davisons actions were \"relatively inconsequential as a    practical matter, Randalls action did in fact violate his    First Amendment right to free speech.  <\/p>\n<p>    The court holds only that under the specific circumstances    presented here, [the] defendant violated the First Amendment by    engaging in viewpoint discrimination and banning plaintiff from    a digital forum for criticizing her colleagues in the county    government, the ruling states.  <\/p>\n<p>    A central question in the suit was whether the chairwomans    Chair Phyllis J. Randall Facebook page was her official    county government profile. Davison maintains it is.  <\/p>\n<p>    In his ruling, Judge Cacheris said that Randalls Facebook page    in question operates as a forum for speech under the First    Amendment to the U.S. and Virginia constitutions.  <\/p>\n<p>    However, Cacheris ruled that Randall did not violate Davisons    due process rights under the 14th Amendment of the U.S.    Constitution and would not be subject to Davisons request for    injunctive relief.  <\/p>\n<p>    A federal court has once again confirmed that speech is one of    our most cherished rights under the Constitution, Davison said    in a statement to the Times-Mirror following the ruling.      Our elected officials cannot open up official communication    channels for propaganda and praise and then ban their critics.    Randall is the first Loudoun official to be rebuked for    violating citizen's civil rights but definitely will not be the    last.  <\/p>\n<p>    In a prepared statement, Randall said despite Judge Cacheris    ruling, it does not give people the right to smear elected    officials on social media.  <\/p>\n<p>    I value our right to free speech and I have fought to defend    that right, Randall said. The courts decision, however, does    not mean that people should make disparaging, untrue, or    slanderous remarks about elected officials or their family    members on social media. The courts decision states that we    may moderate comments on these public forums in accordance with    established policies to preserve social media as a meaningful    place to exchange ideas in a respectful and civil manner.  <\/p>\n<p>    Davisons lawsuit was filed after comments he made last July on    the Loudoun County Government Facebook page disappeared.  <\/p>\n<p>    In May, his claims regarding the governments page were    dismissed by the court after Facebook confirmed that the county    was not responsible for removing Davisons comments and that it    had been Facebook software that caused his comments to be    erased.  <\/p>\n<p>    Back in March     Judge Cacheris ruled Plowman did not violate the First    Amendment by deleting Davisons Facebook posts. However,    Davison has since filed a motion to appeal that decision.  <\/p>\n<p>  Comments express only the views of the author and do not  necessarily reflect the views of this website or any associated  person or entity. Any user who believes a message is  objectionable can contact us at [emailprotected].<\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the rest here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.loudountimes.com\/news\/article\/u.s._district_judge_rules_randall\" title=\"US District judge rules Randall violated Lansdowne resident's First Amendment right - Loudoun Times-Mirror\">US District judge rules Randall violated Lansdowne resident's First Amendment right - Loudoun Times-Mirror<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Loudoun County Chairwoman Phyllis Randall (D-At Large) acted under the color of state law in maintaining her Chair Phyllis J. Randall Facebook page and banning Lansdowne resident Brian Davison from the page overnight, yet Randall violated Davison's First Amendment right under the U.S <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/first-amendment-2\/us-district-judge-rules-randall-violated-lansdowne-residents-first-amendment-right-loudoun-times-mirror.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[261459],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-230717","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-first-amendment-2"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230717"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=230717"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230717\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=230717"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=230717"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=230717"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}