{"id":229835,"date":"2017-07-24T06:47:20","date_gmt":"2017-07-24T10:47:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/vets-balk-at-hill-proposal-to-offer-choice-health-care-washington-times.php"},"modified":"2017-07-24T06:47:20","modified_gmt":"2017-07-24T10:47:20","slug":"vets-balk-at-hill-proposal-to-offer-choice-health-care-washington-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/health-care\/vets-balk-at-hill-proposal-to-offer-choice-health-care-washington-times.php","title":{"rendered":"Vets balk at Hill proposal to offer &#8216;choice&#8217; health care &#8211; Washington Times"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Several leading veterans groups are voicing opposition to    House legislation scheduled for a vote Monday that would shift    $2 billion from some veterans programs to fill a budget    shortfall in a choice health care plan that allows veterans    to see a private doctor.  <\/p>\n<p>    The groups, representing 21 million veterans, said the    legislation is unacceptable because it would divert tax    dollars from Department of Veterans Affairs programs without    addressing other critical problems in the VA system.  <\/p>\n<p>    We oppose legislation that includes funding only for the    choice program which provides additional community care    options, but makes no investment in VA and uses savings from other    veterans benefits or services to pay for the choice    program, the groups said.  <\/p>\n<p>    The statement was signed by AMVETS, Disabled American Veterans,    the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans Association, the Military    Officers Association of America, the Military Order of the    Purple Heart, the Veterans of Foreign Wars, Vietnam Veterans of    America and the Wounded Warrior Project.  <\/p>\n<p>    The House Committee on Veterans Affairs released the proposal    on Friday, and Republican leaders have scheduled a vote by the    full House for Monday night. To offset spending, the VA would trim pensions for some    veterans who are in nursing homes covered by Medicaid and    collect fees for housing loans.  <\/p>\n<p>    Lawmakers and the VA are    trying to find a solution to a funding shortfall in the    Veterans Choice program, which allows veterans to seek a    private doctor if they live more than 40 miles from the nearest    VA medical facility or if they cant get an appointment in the    VA system within 30 days. The    legislation would extend that program for six months.  <\/p>\n<p>    The popular program was created as a response to a scandal in    2014 in the VA system over    delayed care and veterans who died waiting for appointments.    But the choice program is due to run out of money in    mid-August, and the VA already    has been cutting back on private care options for veterans in    the meantime.  <\/p>\n<p>    The VA has an annual budget of    about $167 billion.  <\/p>\n<p>    The veterans groups opposed to the legislation said Congress    should beef up both the choice program and other services for    veterans instead of shifting money around within the VA budget.  <\/p>\n<p>    If new funding is directed only or primarily to private sector    choice care without any adequate investment to modernize    VA, the viability of the    entire system will soon be in danger, the groups said.  <\/p>\n<p>    Another veterans group that favors providing veterans with    more private-sector options, Concerned Veterans for America,    has endorsed the legislation.  <\/p>\n<p>    CVA policy director Dan Caldwell called the House measure a    practical solution that will address the problem quickly and in    a fiscally responsible manner.  <\/p>\n<p>    This plan will ensure that the veterans who have been able to    successfully use the choice program will not face any lapses in    care due to the program running out of money in the coming    weeks, Mr. Caldwell said. We urge Congress to reject straw    man arguments from defenders of the status quo who are using    this moment to advance their anti-choice agenda instead of    doing whats best for veterans. There is no reason to tie    fixing the Veteran Choice Program to other unnecessary spending    increases, especially considering that a VA appropriations bill, with a nearly    $2 billion dollar budget, is already in the works.  <\/p>\n<p>    Still another group, the Paralyzed Veterans of America, chose    not to take a position on the legislation. It said tradeoffs in    VA budgeting are nothing new.  <\/p>\n<p>    Paralyzed Veterans main concern is that using these offsets    to pay for VA health care    comes at the expense of expanding nonhealth care benefits, such    as disability compensation, said executive director Sherman    Gillums Jr. However, we are not prepared to simply oppose    offsets because we believe VA    is open to strengthening health care for our most    catastrophically disabled veterans, which matters above all    else.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the original post here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtontimes.com\/news\/2017\/jul\/23\/veterans-balk-at-hill-proposal-to-offer-choice-hea\/\" title=\"Vets balk at Hill proposal to offer 'choice' health care - Washington Times\">Vets balk at Hill proposal to offer 'choice' health care - Washington Times<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Several leading veterans groups are voicing opposition to House legislation scheduled for a vote Monday that would shift $2 billion from some veterans programs to fill a budget shortfall in a choice health care plan that allows veterans to see a private doctor. The groups, representing 21 million veterans, said the legislation is unacceptable because it would divert tax dollars from Department of Veterans Affairs programs without addressing other critical problems in the VA system. We oppose legislation that includes funding only for the choice program which provides additional community care options, but makes no investment in VA and uses savings from other veterans benefits or services to pay for the choice program, the groups said <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/health-care\/vets-balk-at-hill-proposal-to-offer-choice-health-care-washington-times.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-229835","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-health-care"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/229835"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=229835"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/229835\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=229835"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=229835"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=229835"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}