Editor: <\/p>\n
Too often when liberals, in general, read the Constitution they pick and choose the wording they want to follow. Armed Teachers a Bad Idea (published in the July 11 edition of the Uinta County Herald) is a perfect example of this. To make my point, in italics is the whole Second Amendment: <\/p>\n
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. <\/p>\n
Of course, liberals with their typical big-government beliefs will only see the words well regulated and it stops there. <\/p>\n
The first question I have to ask is who are the militia? By definition they are a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army. <\/p>\n
So, we, the people, are the militia, and in order to keep a free state around the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. <\/p>\n
Does it say what kind of weapons I can and cant own? No, it doesnt. A group of men known as the founders had just spent years fighting a tyrannical government with the same weapons the government had. <\/p>\n
So, the second the government makes any law restricting people from owning the type of weaponry they can afford and desire, they are in violation of the Second Amendment. <\/p>\n
For all of the Christians out there, Luke 22:36 says, Then said he unto them, but now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. <\/p>\n
Its plain and simple that you should own and familiarize yourself with weapons. <\/p>\n
And now onto the part that really just confused me more than anything. What about the childs psyche? Most of us have been around or involved with firearms since we were children. Some of us parked off school property so we could leave our rifles in our trucks and go hunting after school. <\/p>\n
Guns dont commit crimes and criminals dont care about laws. <\/p>\n
I read the comments on the website and I have to applaud most of you for actually giving it traffic. However, there are a few things I would like to clarify. <\/p>\n
I took an oath 10 years ago. I was disqualified from serving due to my medical record but I still took an oath; to some people that means something. Secondly, I agree that teachers need sufficient training breach and clear techniques need to be taught. <\/p>\n
Finally, I am not a gun nut, I just understand the Constitution as what it is, a legal document. <\/p>\n
Patrick Ballinger <\/p>\n
Evanston <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
See the article here: <\/p>\n
Letter: Understanding the Second Amendment - Uinta County Herald<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Editor: Too often when liberals, in general, read the Constitution they pick and choose the wording they want to follow. Armed Teachers a Bad Idea (published in the July 11 edition of the Uinta County Herald) is a perfect example of this. To make my point, in italics is the whole Second Amendment: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed Continue reading