{"id":228214,"date":"2017-07-16T11:12:51","date_gmt":"2017-07-16T15:12:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/chinas-newest-censorship-methods-on-display-ifex.php"},"modified":"2017-07-16T11:12:51","modified_gmt":"2017-07-16T15:12:51","slug":"chinas-newest-censorship-methods-on-display-ifex","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/censorship\/chinas-newest-censorship-methods-on-display-ifex.php","title":{"rendered":"China&#8217;s newest censorship methods on display &#8211; IFEX"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    This statement was originally published on freedomhouse.org on 13 July 2017.  <\/p>\n<p>    Sarah Cook, Senior Research Analyst for East Asia  <\/p>\n<p>    July, more than most other months, is loaded with politically    sensitive anniversaries that keep Communist Party of China    (CPC) censors and security forces on their toes.  <\/p>\n<p>    First comes the July 1 anniversary of Hong Kong's transfer from    British to Chinese rule. Then there is July 5, marking the 2009    ethnic violence in the Xinjiang region that sparked an    unprecedented crackdown on its mostly Muslim Uyghur population.    The very next day, July 6, is the Dalai Lama's birthday, and    July 9 is the second anniversary of a sweeping repressive    action against China's human rights lawyers. Finally there is    July 20, the date in 1999 when the CPC banned the popular    spiritual practice Falun Gong and began a massive - and often    violent - campaign to eradicate it.  <\/p>\n<p>    This year, the anniversaries overlap with other news stories    that Beijing likely wants to quash, including an international    uproar surrounding democracy activist Liu Xiaobo's belated    release on medical parole with terminal cancer, and a campaign    by exiled tycoon Guo Wengui to publicize corruption allegations    involving top Chinese leaders.  <\/p>\n<p>    It is not surprising in these circumstances that the CPC has    tightened information controls. But the party has not simply    intensified its efforts in the short term. It has also    gradually adapted its methods to a changing technological    environment, one in which mobile phones, social media    applications, and digital surveillance are critical features.  <\/p>\n<p>    The result is a new level of intrusiveness and sophistication,    as well as danger for populations that are already at risk of    severe human rights violations.  <\/p>\n<p>    One of the escalating restrictions that may have the widest    reach is a crackdown on virtual private networks (VPNs), which    allow users to bypass official censorship. Several VPN    applications have been disabled or removed from online stores    since July 1. In a June 22 message to customers, prominent VPN    provider Green said that after receiving \"a notice from the    higher authorities,\" it planned to cease operations on July 1,    causing a ripple of conversations on social media about what    circumvention tools could still be used. The latest initiative    builds on increasing official efforts to stop the dissemination    of such tools, including some that the authorities had long    tolerated.  <\/p>\n<p>    The applications' removal will have the secondary effect of    cutting off software updates for users, leaving their devices    more vulnerable to hacking. And while many use VPNs to access    uncensored news or blocked social media sites like Facebook and    Twitter, the tools are also used for security purposes, to    protect businesses and activists from pervasive state    surveillance.  <\/p>\n<p>    Other recent controls have focused on ethnic and religious    minorities. In Xinjiang, authorities in a district of the    regional capital Urumqi issued a notice on June 27 instructing    all residents and business owners to submit their \"personal ID    cards, cell phones, external drives, portable hard drives,    notebook computers, and media storage cards\" to the local    police post for \"registration and scanning\" by August 1. One    district employee told Radio Free Asia that the campaign was    taking place throughout the city. The goal is ostensibly to    identify and purge any \"terrorist videos,\" but the action    violates the privacy rights of Urumqi's three million residents    and exposes them to punishment for a host of other possible    offenses, including those related to peaceful religious or    political expression.  <\/p>\n<p>    In Tibet, the instant-messaging application WeChat has become    increasingly popular in recent years, as it has across China.    But using it to communicate about the Dalai Lama or his    birthday is difficult and dangerous. A test conducted in    January by the Canada-based Citizen Lab found that the Tibetan    spelling for \"Dalai Lama\" was automatically deleted in WeChat    messages. Meanwhile, at least two Tibetans are known to have    been jailed for participating in a WeChat group commemorating    the spiritual leader's 80th birthday in 2015. After a new spate    of self-immolation protests took place in early 2017, Tibetans    in Sichuan Province report that police are monitoring    communication on the platform more closely and detaining those    suspected of sharing information about self-immolations with    overseas contacts.  <\/p>\n<p>    These developments reflect a broader trend identified in a    recent Freedom House report on religion in China. The study    found that Chinese government tactics of religious control and    persecution have been changing to incorporate new technologies    and match the evolving communication habits of the public. Even    in the absence of sensitive anniversaries, various modes of    electronic surveillance have expanded dramatically at sites of    worship and public spaces frequented by religious believers.  <\/p>\n<p>    The CPC's information controls also appear to be spreading to    traditionally less persecuted groups, like state-sanctioned    churches and non-Uyghur residents of Xinjiang. Since March,    authorities in Zhejiang have reportedly been    implementing a campaign to install surveillance cameras in churches and    possibly Buddhist temples, in some cases sparking    altercations with police and violence against congregants. In    Urumqi, the order to turn in digital devices for inspection applies to ethnic Han and    Kazakh residents as well as Uyghurs, while    local Kazakhs have reported increased monitoring and some    prosecutions related to expressions of their Muslim faith in    recent months.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Chinese government's actions are partly a response to    creative initiatives by minority activists to share their    stories and perspectives in a heavily restrictive information    environment.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"It is a nonstop game of cat-and-mouse,\" journalist Nithin Coca    wrote in a June 27 article about China's high-tech    war on Tibetan communication. \"As the Tibet movement's    digital-security abilities and training improve, the Chinese    government implements more sophisticated hacking techniques.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Similarly, as Falun Gong practitioners devise new means    of disseminating information to debunk vilifying state    propaganda and expose abuses they have suffered, security    forces have adapted by increasing electronic surveillance and    deploying geolocation technology to find and arrest them. Local    authorities in places like Jiangsu province have also upgraded    anti-Falun Gong propaganda efforts, deploying LED rolling    screens, cartoons, microblogs, and QQ messaging - including in    schools - last month to demonize Falun Gong and other banned    religious groups.  <\/p>\n<p>    The result of the escalating controls is that there are even    fewer avenues for persecuted groups and individuals to defend    themselves, offer alternatives to the party line, or expose    violence committed by officials. Meanwhile, other Chinese    interested in knowing more about these and other censored    topics find it increasingly difficult - and risky - to obtain    information.  <\/p>\n<p>    There is also a cost to the CPC. Such aggressive \"stability    maintenance\" methods ultimately increase tensions with key    populations, intensify resentment of the party's heavy-handed    rule, and inspire anti-government activism and even violence,    including among otherwise apolitical citizens.  <\/p>\n<p>    From that perspective, while the CPC's efforts may successfully    silence some critics this year, party leaders may face an even    more daunting challenge next July.  <\/p>\n<p>    This article was also published in the Diplomat on July 7, 2017.  <\/p>\n<p>    Sarah Cook is a senior research analyst for East Asia at    Freedom House, director of its China Media Bulletin, and author of    \"The Battle for China's Spirit: Religious    Revival, Repression, and Resistance under Xi Jinping\".  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the rest here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ifex.org\/china\/2017\/07\/15\/newest-censorship-methods\/\" title=\"China's newest censorship methods on display - IFEX\">China's newest censorship methods on display - IFEX<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> This statement was originally published on freedomhouse.org on 13 July 2017. Sarah Cook, Senior Research Analyst for East Asia July, more than most other months, is loaded with politically sensitive anniversaries that keep Communist Party of China (CPC) censors and security forces on their toes.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/censorship\/chinas-newest-censorship-methods-on-display-ifex.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[388393],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-228214","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-censorship"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228214"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=228214"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228214\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=228214"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=228214"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=228214"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}