STORY WRITTEN FORCBS NEWS& USED WITH PERMISSION <\/p>\n
Processing images from the camera aboard NASAs Juno spacecraft orbiting Jupiter has turned into a cottage industry of sorts, as rank amateurs, accomplished artists and experienced researchers turn relatively drab raw images into shots ranging from whimsical to spectacular and everything in between. <\/p>\n
The question is, how accurately do they reflect reality, and is there any way for the casual observer to judge the result? <\/p>\n
Unlike other NASA spacecraft, the JunoCam imager aboard the Juno spacecraft was added to the mission primarily for public outreach. Its pictures have no bearing on the missions scientific objectives, which rely on a suite of eight other instruments to study Jupiters interior structure, its gravity and magnetic fields and its immediate environment. <\/p>\n
JunoCams images are only lightly processed by the cameras builder Malin Space Science Systems of San Diego and immediately posted on line. What happens after that is up to the public. <\/p>\n
Once its in their hands, we have no control, nor do we want to exert any, over what they do with the data, said Candy Hansen, a senior scientist at the Planetary Science Institute and the JunoCam instrument lead. So we have gotten everything from careful scientific-type processing to incredibly whimsical works of art. So its a little bit, for you, a buyer-beware situation. <\/p>\n
Even so, she said, were all in, in the sense that I dont have a team of scientists and image processors waiting in the wings in case the public doesnt show up. We dont have a budget, we dont have staff or anything like that. So we are entirely, 100 percent, relying on the public. And some of them have done fabulous work. <\/p>\n
Juno is the first spacecraft to be sent into an orbit around Jupiters poles, and JunoCam was designed primarily to capture detailed images of the planets heretofore unseen polar regions. <\/p>\n
Because of weight, volume and power restrictions, the spacecraft could not support an advanced telescopic camera. Instead, it was equipped with a relatively simple imager with what amounts to a fish-eye lens. Malin Space Science Systems provided a similar camera to photograph the Curiosity rovers descent to Mars. <\/p>\n
While JunoCam is not as powerful as the sophisticated telescopes and sensors launched aboard other NASA probes, Junos elliptical orbit carries it closer to Jupiter than any other spacecraft, within a few thousand miles of the giant planets cloud tops. As a result, JunoCams wide-angle views provide exceptional detail and more context than more powerful narrow-angle instruments. <\/p>\n
But how realistic are the publics interpretations of JunoCam images? With other NASA spacecraft, the viewer can have confidence the photos were processed and reviewed by scientifically competent team members and that the images reflect some sort of scientific reality. <\/p>\n
With public processing, as Hansen said, its more a case of buyer beware, and the relatively bland raw images lend themselves to Photoshop-type manipulation. To Hansen, the line between a scientifically accurate image and one that takes liberties with the data is the minute you depart from true color. <\/p>\n
The minute you start making the blue a little bluer and the red a little redder, now youve enhanced the color. And when you really go to the sort of wild ends of the color palette, then I would call it exaggerated. If youre just plain making up things, then its false color. <\/p>\n
So should viewers wanting to learn more about Jupiter prefer realistic lighting and color to enhanced or exaggerated images? <\/p>\n
Let me argue against that, she said. Our human eye-brain combination is better at seeing details that are there when you exaggerate it a bit, when you enhance it a bit. The details, you can see (them) if you know what youre looking for in the true color images. But its so subtle, its really, like, washed out. I would say we learn a lot by looking at enhanced color images because it pops more to the eye-brain combo. <\/p>\n
Raw images from JunoCam are posted on a website Hansen helps manage. Each raw image includes the same view shot in green, blue and red filters and then a slightly processed color view that is a combination of all three. The public can download those images, process them in a wide variety of ways and upload the results back to the website. <\/p>\n
As long as the processed images relate to Jupiter, and dont contain unrelated or objectionable material, they are re-posted and available for anyone to download. All are in the public domain, although uploaders can opt to restrict commercial usage. <\/p>\n
Hansen cited several processors for their work, including Bjrn Jnsson, who she said goes to great lengths to ensure realistic lighting and color, and Sen Doran, a graphic artist whose enhanced images are incredibly beautiful, they are drop-dead gorgeous. <\/p>\n
Gerald Eichstdt, a mathematician and software developer, devised code to ensure uniform lighting across an image, Hansen said, adding Im urging him to write up an actual science paper and get some credit for all that work, at least in the scientific community. <\/p>\n
In an email exchange with CBS News, Doran said his images are based on Eichstdts work, adding my aim is to provide an aesthetic enhancement to what he has done. <\/p>\n
I use a range of techniques in Photoshop to extract detail and enhance subtleties in the source image, he wrote. This can develop into quite a large set of actions and layers each with different non-destructive adjustments and masks. These layers are treated with various blend modes to provide finer control in mixing toward the final image. <\/p>\n
I also use exposure settings to draw the eye and give volume to the image. Knowing when to stop is intuitive, and in some cases I will scrap what I have done and start again. <\/p>\n
He said he was inspired by the work of Jnsson and Justin Cowart, whose images provide realistic renderings of Jupiter. Their work is beautiful. <\/p>\n
Last Monday, Juno flew over Jupiters Great Red Spot for the first time, a highly anticipated event. The Great Red Spot is the largest, most powerful storm in the solar system, stretching more than 10,000 miles across. Within minutes of the first raw images being posted, image processors around the world began uploading their interpretations. <\/p>\n
People must have been just sitting there waiting with Photoshop open! Hansen laughed. Within 45 minutes, I already had a queue to approve. This has really been fun. <\/p>\n
Said Doran: We are only at the start of coming to grips with this data, and in time I expect to see very many beautiful and harmonious treatments. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Visit link: <\/p>\n
Jupiter images thrill, inspire public participation - Spaceflight Now<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" STORY WRITTEN FORCBS NEWS& USED WITH PERMISSION Processing images from the camera aboard NASAs Juno spacecraft orbiting Jupiter has turned into a cottage industry of sorts, as rank amateurs, accomplished artists and experienced researchers turn relatively drab raw images into shots ranging from whimsical to spectacular and everything in between. The question is, how accurately do they reflect reality, and is there any way for the casual observer to judge the result? Continue reading