{"id":228105,"date":"2017-07-16T10:43:33","date_gmt":"2017-07-16T14:43:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/why-chinas-aerospace-industry-needs-technological-heroes-sixth-tone.php"},"modified":"2017-07-16T10:43:33","modified_gmt":"2017-07-16T14:43:33","slug":"why-chinas-aerospace-industry-needs-technological-heroes-sixth-tone","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/aerospace\/why-chinas-aerospace-industry-needs-technological-heroes-sixth-tone.php","title":{"rendered":"Why China&#8217;s Aerospace Industry Needs Technological Heroes &#8211; Sixth Tone"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    On the evening of July 2, China launched the Long March 5 rocket at the    Wenchang Spacecraft Launch Center in Hainan, Chinas    southernmost province. Shortly afterward, an engine failure    sent the rocket plummeting into the Pacific Ocean.  <\/p>\n<p>    The specter of failure always looms over space launches;    however, setbacks have become somewhat more frequent for    Chinas space program in recent years. On June 19, just a    couple of weeks before the failed launch of Long March 5, the    Long March 3B carrier rocket launched from Xichang Satellite Launch    Center in the southwestern province of Sichuan with the    ChinaSat 9A communications satellite as its payload. However,    another engine malfunction initially prevented the satellite    from entering its planned orbit. Two failed launches also    occurred in 2016.  <\/p>\n<p>    Some might say that the failure of the Long March 5 is to be    expected, as it is a relatively new model. Concerningly,    however, the other failures all occurred with more established    rocket models. And for me, whats most worrying of all is the    recent attitude change inside the China National Space    Administration (CNSA) regarding these failures.  <\/p>\n<p>    On Aug. 18, 2011, the launch of the Long March 2C-Y26 rocket    from the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center in northern Chinas    Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region was unsuccessful due to a connection failure between    one of the engines and its control system. The failed test cast    doubt on the launch centers planned space dock between the Tiangong-1 space    module and the Shenzhou-8 spacecraft, a maneuver that would be    a first for China.  <\/p>\n<p>    Some said that Tiangong-1 could be launched as scheduled,    claiming that the rocket propelling it into orbit  also a    member of the Long March class  was built to a different,    better-tested specification. However, the mission command    center was resolute that the launch of Tiangong-1 should be    halted so that the malfunction in the Long March 2C rocket    could be located. While the two Long March rockets were    different from one another, they still belonged to the same    series. As a result, the launch of the Tiangong-1 was pushed    back 40 days until the connecting mechanism was strengthened.  <\/p>\n<p>    This delay came at a cost. For one thing, it caused a great    deal of trouble for the launch center, located out in the Gobi    Desert. It rained heavily around Jiuquan that year, and the    storage space for Tiangong-1 became dangerously humid. The    launch sites staff had to think on their feet to maintain the    humidity levels that Tiangong-1 required, working around the    clock to ensure that the machine remained functional.    Eventually, they succeeded.  <\/p>\n<p>    There are many other stories like this. However, in the last    few years, an oppressively bureaucratic atmosphere has spread    through Chinas aerospace industry.  <\/p>\n<p>    Last September, after the Long March 4C carrier rocket failed during its launch of the Gaofen-10    satellite at Xichang Satellite Launch Center, I attended the    teleconference held to analyze the malfunction. It is a    standard operation procedure to have such meeting after each    launch failure. As soon as I entered the venue, a member of    staff informed me that the conference could not be filmed. I    replied that this was unacceptable: The experts from the launch    site were in attendance, and since my company had been    instructed to come and shoot the proceedings, I needed to    return with footage.  <\/p>\n<p>    After debating this for quite some time, it was finally decided    that I could only film the crew from the launch site. No    members of the China Aerospace Science and Technology    Corporation (CASC), the space programs main contractor, could    appear in any shots. The argument left a bitter taste in my    mouth, because this individual made me feel stifled. This was    not the atmosphere that a scientific research organization was    supposed to have. It smacked of politicians trying to weasel    their way out of speaking frankly about the failed launch.  <\/p>\n<p>    In the end, the entire conference was stymied by red tape.    Experts from the CASC, the launch site, the Xian-based rocket    manufacturing plant, and the China Academy of Launch Vehicle    Technology (CALT) all came up to the podium, but many of their    speeches rambled on without attempting to assume any    responsibility for the issue. Since then, I have been unable to    recover that unified, issue-focused feeling that once    characterized these kinds of conferences.  <\/p>\n<p>    The bureaucratization of the aerospace industry was followed by    anothercorrespondingtrend. Gradually, key players    in Chinas space program have left the industry and gone into    politics. Around 2013, four high ranking officials in CASC and    CNSA were promoted as provincial governors.  <\/p>\n<p>    Throughout the history of the Peoples Republic, the aerospace    industry has enjoyed a status that far outshines that of other    industries. Even today, its profound impact on ordinary Chinese    serves as a rallying point for national cohesion; it is an    irreplaceable symbol of this countrys thriving development. It    is only natural for the people who emerge from this industry to    become provincial governors and national leaders. However, Id    rather Chinas aerospace industry produced more technological    heroes  like the celebrated rocket scientist, Qian Xuesen, and    the father of Chinas atom bomb, Qian Sanqiang.  <\/p>\n<p>    In China, we have always taken great pride in our space program. While we    still feel deeply proud of it today, there is a lingering sense    that the program isnt what it once was. I hope that the space    program can divest itself of the stench of bureaucracy that    currently enshrouds it. This is not an atmosphere befitting of    true scientific inquiry.  <\/p>\n<p>    Translator: Zachary Haluza; editors: Wu Haiyun, Yang    Xiaozhou, and Matthew Walsh.  <\/p>\n<p>    (Header image: A Long March 5 Y2 rocket blasts off at the    Wenchang Space Launch Center in Hainan province, July 2, 2017.    Shi Yan\/VCG)  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the rest here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.sixthtone.com\/news\/1000513\/why-chinas-aerospace-industry-needs-technological-heroes\" title=\"Why China's Aerospace Industry Needs Technological Heroes - Sixth Tone\">Why China's Aerospace Industry Needs Technological Heroes - Sixth Tone<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> On the evening of July 2, China launched the Long March 5 rocket at the Wenchang Spacecraft Launch Center in Hainan, Chinas southernmost province.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/aerospace\/why-chinas-aerospace-industry-needs-technological-heroes-sixth-tone.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-228105","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-aerospace"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228105"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=228105"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228105\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=228105"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=228105"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=228105"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}