{"id":227639,"date":"2017-07-14T05:05:15","date_gmt":"2017-07-14T09:05:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/india-china-border-row-nsa-ajit-doval-likely-to-visit-beijing-for-brics-nsas-meeting-on-27-and-28-july-firstpost.php"},"modified":"2017-07-14T05:05:15","modified_gmt":"2017-07-14T09:05:15","slug":"india-china-border-row-nsa-ajit-doval-likely-to-visit-beijing-for-brics-nsas-meeting-on-27-and-28-july-firstpost","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/nsa-2\/india-china-border-row-nsa-ajit-doval-likely-to-visit-beijing-for-brics-nsas-meeting-on-27-and-28-july-firstpost.php","title":{"rendered":"India-China border row: NSA Ajit Doval likely to visit Beijing for BRICS NSAs meeting on 27 and 28 July &#8211; Firstpost"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    As the border standoff between India and China in Doka La,    Sikkim continues, reports said that National Security Advisor    (NSA) Ajit Doval is likely to visit Beijing for the BRICS    (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) NSAs meeting    scheduled to take place on 27 and 28 July.  <\/p>\n<p>    If the NSA does end up visiting Beijing, it will be a crucial trip    and a probable step to resolve the almost-month-old border    dispute.The Indian Express also reported    that the meeting will be hosted by Doval's counterpart and    Chinese state councillor Yang Jiechi. Both Doval and Jiechi are    special representatives designated by their respective    governments to discuss border issues.  <\/p>\n<p>      File image of Ajit Doval. AFP    <\/p>\n<p>    India on Thursday had maintained that the current border    standoff in Doklam would be resolved diplomatically, similar to    how all its disputes with Beijing in the past had been solved    using diplomatic channels.  <\/p>\n<p>    External affairs ministry spokesperson Gopal Baglay had said    diplomatic channels were \"available\" to the two countries that    would continue to be used.  <\/p>\n<p>    He had referred to a \"conversation\" between Prime Minister    Narendra Modi and Chinese president Xi Jinping on the sidelines    of the G20 Summit in Hamburg last week \"where they spoke on a    range of issues\".  <\/p>\n<p>    \"As far as the Doklam issue is concerned, you know we have    diplomatic channels. Embassies are there in both the countries    and those channels will continue to be used,\" Baglay had said    in his weekly media briefing.  <\/p>\n<p>    India and China are locked in a standoff in the Doklam area in    Sikkim sector near the Bhutan tri-junction for over three weeks    after the Chinese army attempted to build a road in the    disputed narrow stretch of land.  <\/p>\n<p>    Doklam is the Indian name for the region which China refers to    as Donglong.  <\/p>\n<p>    Asked about the provocative statements from China and the    Chinese media over the border issue, the spokesperson had said    that the government had \"clearly laid out\" its position and    approach to deal with the matter.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"We have referred to how the two governments have been engaged    in the last few years in addressing this issue, the boundary    matter and the tri-junction. We have also mentioned    understandings between the two countries,\" he had said.  <\/p>\n<p>    Baglay had referred to Foreign Secretary S Jaishankar's speech    in Singapore earlier this week when he had said that India and    China have handled their border issues in the past and there    was no reason why they would not be able to deal with it this    time.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"He (Jaishankar) referred to the understanding between the two    leaders (Modi and Xi) which essentially underlines the approach    we are following in this regard. So, we are very much seized of    the matter, we are very much sure of the approach that is being    taken and that is where it stands,\" the spokesperson had said.  <\/p>\n<p>    On Wednesday, Chinese foreign office spokesman Geng Shuang had    dismissed Jaishankar's remarks, saying the \"trespass\" by the    Indian troops in Doklam was different from the \"frictions in    the undefined sections of the boundary\" between India and    China.  <\/p>\n<p>    Asked if Modi and Xi particularly talked about the Doklam    issue, Baglay had refused a direct reply, saying, \"I would    leave it to your imagination and common sense to summarise what    can be covered in the range of issues.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    With inputs from PTI  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the original post here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.firstpost.com\/india\/india-china-border-row-nsa-ajit-doval-likely-to-visit-beijing-for-brics-nsas-meeting-on-27-and-28-july-3811461.html\" title=\"India-China border row: NSA Ajit Doval likely to visit Beijing for BRICS NSAs meeting on 27 and 28 July - Firstpost\">India-China border row: NSA Ajit Doval likely to visit Beijing for BRICS NSAs meeting on 27 and 28 July - Firstpost<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> As the border standoff between India and China in Doka La, Sikkim continues, reports said that National Security Advisor (NSA) Ajit Doval is likely to visit Beijing for the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) NSAs meeting scheduled to take place on 27 and 28 July. If the NSA does end up visiting Beijing, it will be a crucial trip and a probable step to resolve the almost-month-old border dispute.The Indian Express also reported that the meeting will be hosted by Doval's counterpart and Chinese state councillor Yang Jiechi <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/nsa-2\/india-china-border-row-nsa-ajit-doval-likely-to-visit-beijing-for-brics-nsas-meeting-on-27-and-28-july-firstpost.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[261463],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-227639","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nsa-2"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227639"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=227639"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227639\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=227639"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=227639"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=227639"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}