{"id":226621,"date":"2017-07-08T19:14:35","date_gmt":"2017-07-08T23:14:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/nelsons-leads-tanglewood-resurrection-the-boston-musical-the-boston-musical-intelligencer.php"},"modified":"2017-07-08T19:14:35","modified_gmt":"2017-07-08T23:14:35","slug":"nelsons-leads-tanglewood-resurrection-the-boston-musical-the-boston-musical-intelligencer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/pantheism\/nelsons-leads-tanglewood-resurrection-the-boston-musical-the-boston-musical-intelligencer.php","title":{"rendered":"Nelsons Leads Tanglewood Resurrection &#8211; The Boston Musical &#8230; &#8211; The Boston Musical Intelligencer"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>July 8, 2017        by Jeffrey Gantz    <\/p>\n<p>        One hundred and    fifty-seven years after Gustav Mahlers birth on July 7, 1860,    he could hardly have imagined a better birthday present than    the performance of his Second Symphony, the    Resurrection, that Andris Nelsons and the Boston    Symphony Orchestra gave to open Tanglewoods 2017 season.  <\/p>\n<p>    Mahler premiered the Resurrection in Berlin in 1895,    to a mixed reception. The certainty of its redemptive Finale    would give way to the pantheism of his Third Symphony, the    mortal humor of the Fourth and Fifth, the mortal tragedy of the    Sixth, the mundane humor of the Seventh, and the death struggle    that is Das Lied von der Erde and the Ninth and Tenth.    But Mahler never outgrew the hope of the Resurrection.    It was the piece he conducted at his Vienna farewell concert,    after he had resigned as director of the Vienna Hofoper. It was    the first of his symphonies that he conducted in New York    (1908), and the first that he conducted in Paris (1910).  <\/p>\n<p>    The Resurrection symphony also prompted the late New    York businessman and financier Gilbert Kaplan to acquire the    autograph manuscript of Mahlers score and take up the baton.    Kaplan conducted Mahlers Second on more than 100 occasions,    and he recorded it twice, with the London Symphony in 1987 and    the Vienna Philharmonic in 2004. Kaplans philosophy of the    Resurrection was that the angels are in the details,    but theres more to the heaven of this symphony than his    literal readings dream of. On a rainy Friday, Nelsons took it    by the devils horns, so to speak.  <\/p>\n<p>    You dont need Mahlers program to understand that the opening    Allegro maestoso is a funeral march, or that its the hero of    his First Symphony whos in the coffin. But that opening    outburst in the cellos and basses can be calm and resigned or    big and angry. Nelsons went for big and angry. Recorded timings    for this movement range from 17-1\/2 minutes (Otto Klemperer in    1951) to 25-1\/2 minutes (Otto Klemperer in 1971); Nelsons took    25. He gave the initial theme drama, space, and articulation,    making palpable those bars where the cellos and basses, now    downward slipping, recall the passage in the first act of    Wagners Die Walkre when Hunding orders Sieglinde to    prepare food and drink for Siegmund. The wistful, yearning    E-major second theme was fraught, almost self-consciously so,    but on its second appearance, in the development, Nelsons    conjured what T. S. Eliot called the agony in stony places.    He was ferocious where Mahler introduces the plainsong Dies    Irae (Day of Wrath) to the march, then tender when the    yearning theme rises to a hopeful F-sharp, a moment many    conductors gloss over. The coda was measured but never    sagged.  <\/p>\n<p>    Mahler marked a five-minute pause to follow the Allegro    maestoso. Perhaps he thought his audience would need that much    of a break to recover from the gravity of the first movement;    perhaps he thought that the Andante moderato would be jarring    if it followed immediately. Contemporary audiences hardly need    five minutes; conductors these days usually take a brief pause.    Nelsons took three minutes, which seemed just right.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Andante moderato flashes back to happy time in the heros    life; Mahlers program describes it as a memory, a ray of    sunlight, pure and cloudless. The movement has been described    as both a minuet and a Lndler; Nelsons gave it the courtly    delicacy of the one and the rustic sway of the other. One could    have asked for more animation in the stately first trio, but    the transition from the second trio back into the main subject    was seductive, and the drawn-out conclusion was a benediction.  <\/p>\n<p>    In the third movement, I lost Nelsonss thread. Titled In    ruhig flieender Bewegung (In Peacefully Flowing    Movement), its Mahlers remodeling of his Des Knaben    Wunderhorn song Des Antonius von Padua    Fischpredigt, wherein St. Anthony, finding his church    empty, goes to preach to the fishes, who listen attentively    before resuming their venal ways. Mahler describes the movement    as a return to this tangled life of ours after awaking from    the blissful dream of the Andante moderato. Peacefully    flowing describes what Nelsons gave us, but at his moderate    tempo the movement was mild-mannered, with no hint of mincing    sarcasm, and the climaxes didnt have room to register. Even    the moment when the ocean seems to open up and reveal Wagners    Rhinemaidens wanted magic.   <\/p>\n<p>    Mahler was, he tells us, at a loss as to how to redeem this    distorted and crazy world until, in 1894, he attended the    funeral of conductor Hans von Blow and heard a choir sing a    setting of Friedrich Klopstocks poem Auferstehen    (Rise Again). In short order, he fashioned the final two    movements. The fourth, Urlicht (Primal Light), adapts    another of the composers Knaben Wunderhorn songs.    Nelsonss mezzo, Bernarda Fink, sang without a score and with    admirable purity and gravity  she never sounded operatic. She    also conveyed meaning without overenunciating. What she didnt    do was project.  <\/p>\n<p>    Mahler concludes the Resurrection with his own version    of the Klopstock chorale, but not until the Day of Wrath    arrives and the dead rise, march, and stand for Judgment     though as Mahler advises us, There is no Judgment, only A    feeling of overwhelming love. This fifth and final movement    sprawls and is hard to hold together. It begins in chaos before    we hear the Resurrection theme, which, it turns out, is a    rhythmic variation on the Ewig motif from Wagners    Siegfried: Ewig war ich, ewig bin ich    (Eternal I was, eternal I am) is what Brnnhilde sings to    Siegfried after hes braved her ring of fire. You can hear a    foreshadowing of the Resurrection theme as early as bar 48 of    the Allegro maestoso  which makes you wonder whether Mahler    didnt know where he was going with this symphony from the    outset.   <\/p>\n<p>      Andris Nelsons conducts BSO, TFC, Bernardam Fink, and Malin      Christensson (Hilary Scott photo)    <\/p>\n<p>    I wasnt always sure where Nelsons was going either. This    movement was mighty Mahler at the decibel level but some    sections were hustled and others went so slackly that the    phrasing flatlined. The soprano, Malin Christensson, had sung    previously with Nelsons and the BSO in Februarys Bach B-minor    Mass; she was pleasing then and pleasing Friday, but she rarely    rose above the tumult.  <\/p>\n<p>    What Mahler called Der groe Appell (The Great    Call), however, was perfectly calibrated  antiphonal offstage    brass fanfares set against an onstage flutes nightingale,    which Mahler called the bird of death. And it was gratifying    to see the Tanglewood Festival Chorus, all in white, off book.    The choruss first word, Auferstehen, was hushed    (which is the norm in a good performance) but also gentle (a    pleasant surprise). Bereite dich, so often barked,    was a full-throated cheer. Nelsons integrated the tempos of    Sterben werd ich, um zu leben and the slightly    faster Was du geschlagen in a way that few    conductors do, and the climax was fervent.  <\/p>\n<p>    The reading overall was expansive at 87 minutes (excluding that    three-minute pause). As a live performance (real or imagined    shortcomings aside), it measured up to Claudio Abbados    legendary 1979 BSO guesting and, yes, Benjamin Zanders    offering this past April with the Boston Philharmonic. Next to    more compact, natural recordings by the likes of Otto Klemperer    and William Steinberg, Nelsonss interpretation could sound    studied, but for every perplexing moment, came two or three    breathtaking ones. The clarity of the orchestra was remarkable    throughout; the counterpoint between the upper and lower    strings felt palpable, and the winds and the brass executed    with ravishing beauty. A CD of this night would be among the    best in the catalog. Happy birthday Gustav!   <\/p>\n<p>    No comments yet.  <\/p>\n<p>        RSS feed for    comments on this post.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Excerpt from: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.classical-scene.com\/2017\/07\/08\/tanglewood-resurrection\/\" title=\"Nelsons Leads Tanglewood Resurrection - The Boston Musical ... - The Boston Musical Intelligencer\">Nelsons Leads Tanglewood Resurrection - The Boston Musical ... - The Boston Musical Intelligencer<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> July 8, 2017 by Jeffrey Gantz One hundred and fifty-seven years after Gustav Mahlers birth on July 7, 1860, he could hardly have imagined a better birthday present than the performance of his Second Symphony, the Resurrection, that Andris Nelsons and the Boston Symphony Orchestra gave to open Tanglewoods 2017 season. Mahler premiered the Resurrection in Berlin in 1895, to a mixed reception <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/pantheism\/nelsons-leads-tanglewood-resurrection-the-boston-musical-the-boston-musical-intelligencer.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[388390],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-226621","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pantheism"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226621"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=226621"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226621\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=226621"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=226621"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=226621"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}