{"id":226306,"date":"2017-07-07T11:46:59","date_gmt":"2017-07-07T15:46:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/who-would-enjoy-tax-breaks-under-the-gop-health-care-proposals-npr.php"},"modified":"2017-07-07T11:46:59","modified_gmt":"2017-07-07T15:46:59","slug":"who-would-enjoy-tax-breaks-under-the-gop-health-care-proposals-npr","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/health-care\/who-would-enjoy-tax-breaks-under-the-gop-health-care-proposals-npr.php","title":{"rendered":"Who Would Enjoy Tax Breaks Under The GOP Health Care Proposals? &#8211; NPR"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>            The GOP health bills would eliminate the 10 percent tax            on the use of tanning beds. It was one of more than a            dozen taxes introduced as part of the Affordable Care            Act. Robert            Gauthier\/LA Times via Getty Images hide caption          <\/p>\n<p>          The GOP health bills would eliminate the 10 percent tax          on the use of tanning beds. It was one of more than a          dozen taxes introduced as part of the Affordable Care          Act.        <\/p>\n<p>    There's a lot of talk on Capitol Hill about the tax cuts    included in the Republican health plans, but unless you are a    frequent user of tanning beds or have personal wealth that puts    you in the top 1 percent, you might not feel much effect.  <\/p>\n<p>    The House and Senate bills both change or eliminate more than a    dozen taxes that were levied to help pay for the Affordable    Care Act's insurance subsidies and to bolster Medicare and    expand Medicaid. Republicans and other ACA critics have argued    that the taxes are onerous for businesses and families.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the tax cuts and    coverage changes in the Senate proposal would reduce the    federal government's revenue by $700 billion over the next 10    years.  <\/p>\n<p>    We're answering three key questions about the tax cuts:  <\/p>\n<p>    Most of them fall into two buckets.  <\/p>\n<p>    Bucket 1: Taxes related to individual income  <\/p>\n<p>    The ACA levied a 0.9 percent increase in the Medicare payroll    tax on income above $200,000 for individuals or $250,000 for    couples.  <\/p>\n<p>    It also added a 3.8 percent tax on net investment income  as    in stocks, bonds, interest and capital gains  that kicks in    after $200,000 for individuals and $250,000 for couples.  <\/p>\n<p>    As Senate leaders consider revisions to their bill, some    senators  including Republican Bob Corker of Tennessee  have    suggested leaving the investment tax in place to provide more    money for subsidies, but others have objected to that idea.    This would be a major divergence from the House-passed bill.  <\/p>\n<p>    Still, if both of those taxes in the ACA were repealed,    high-income Americans would collectively pay about $231 billion    less in taxes over 10 years, according to the CBO analysis.  <\/p>\n<p>    Bucket 2: Taxes on corporations  <\/p>\n<p>    Since the passage of the ACA, drug companies and medical device    manufacturers have complained that the taxes levied on them    have a chilling effect on innovation and affect their ability    to hire more workers. They also argue that costs are passed    along to consumers in the form of higher prices.  <\/p>\n<p>    Under the Senate plan, drug companies would see an estimated    $25.7 billion cut over 10 years, while medical device makers    would get about $19.6 billion in savings. Some of the cuts    would start as early as this calendar year.  <\/p>\n<p>    In both bills, there's also relief for insurers. The GOP plans    would eliminate a tax on all insurers based on their market    share. Congress waived the tax this year, hoping the one-time    move would help slow premium increases. The CBO analysis of the    Senate bill found a permanent cut would save the industry    $144.7 billion over the next decade.  <\/p>\n<p>    Other taxes outside the buckets  <\/p>\n<p>    Smaller but not insignificant cuts come from eliminating other    taxes, including a limit  $2,600 this year  on how much    workers can annually set aside tax-free in flexible spending    accounts to pay for things like medications, eyeglasses or    co-payments for doctor's office visits. The plans would also    increase the amount people could put in tax-protected health    savings accounts. The Senate proposal would also revert tax law    back to pre-ACA days in setting the threshold for medical    deductions at 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income; the ACA had    boosted that to 10 percent. The House approach is even more    generous.  <\/p>\n<p>    And not to be forgotten: The GOP plans would delete a 10    percent tax on the use of tanning beds.  <\/p>\n<p>    The short answer: Unless you're wealthy, probably not.  <\/p>\n<p>    The ACA significantly increased average taxes on high-income    people mainly through the investment income tax and the    Medicare payroll tax. So the top 1 percent and other high    earners are the group that would benefit most from the repeal,    according to several analyses, including one by the Tax Policy Center, a nonpartisan think tank    in Washington, D.C.  <\/p>\n<p>    Under the GOP proposals, the top 1 percent  those earning    $875,000 a year or more in 2026  would get an average tax cut    of about $40,000 per year, while middle-income people earning    about $50,000 to $90,000 would see about a $300 cut, according    to Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the center.  <\/p>\n<p>    Those earning about $28,000 or less could save an average of    $180 a year through the changes to limits on FSA and HSA    contributions and the threshold on medical deductions, he says.  <\/p>\n<p>    Even though the tax cuts and other changes would reduce    Treasury revenue by about $700 billion over the next decade,    spending cuts exceed that amount, so the deficit actually goes    down by $321 billion, the CBO says.  <\/p>\n<p>    The biggest spending cuts hit the Medicaid program, which    provides health coverage for low-income children and adults and    people with disabilities. Medicaid pays for nearly half of all    births and much of the cost of nursing home care. Spending on    Medicaid by 2026 would shrink by 26 percent compared with what    it would be under the ACA.  <\/p>\n<p>    As to other effects, the number of Americans without health    insurance coverage would rise, the CBO says. Because the GOP    proposals cut the tax penalty for not having insurance, it    estimates that far fewer people would enroll in coverage. That,    coupled with smaller subsidies to help lower- and middle-income    people buy their own insurance and cuts to Medicaid, could lead    to 22 million fewer insured Americans by 2026, the CBO says.  <\/p>\n<p>    States could choose to try to make up for federal Medicaid    spending cuts and maintain current levels of coverage, but that    would probably involve raising state taxes, cutting other    budget items such as education, or both.  <\/p>\n<p>    Kaiser Health News,    a nonprofit health newsroom whose stories appear in news    outlets nationwide, is an editorially independent part of the    Kaiser Family Foundation.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/sections\/health-shots\/2017\/07\/07\/535665925\/who-would-enjoy-tax-breaks-under-the-gop-health-care-proposals\" title=\"Who Would Enjoy Tax Breaks Under The GOP Health Care Proposals? - NPR\">Who Would Enjoy Tax Breaks Under The GOP Health Care Proposals? - NPR<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The GOP health bills would eliminate the 10 percent tax on the use of tanning beds. It was one of more than a dozen taxes introduced as part of the Affordable Care Act <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/health-care\/who-would-enjoy-tax-breaks-under-the-gop-health-care-proposals-npr.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-226306","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-health-care"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226306"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=226306"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226306\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=226306"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=226306"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=226306"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}