{"id":224738,"date":"2017-07-01T08:49:20","date_gmt":"2017-07-01T12:49:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/the-biggest-winner-in-the-current-health-care-debate-single-payer-washington-post.php"},"modified":"2017-07-01T08:49:20","modified_gmt":"2017-07-01T12:49:20","slug":"the-biggest-winner-in-the-current-health-care-debate-single-payer-washington-post","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/health-care\/the-biggest-winner-in-the-current-health-care-debate-single-payer-washington-post.php","title":{"rendered":"The biggest winner in the current health-care debate: Single-payer &#8211; Washington Post"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    We still don't know who will ultimately prevail in the debate    over the future of American health care: the Republicans who    want to overhaul Obamacare, or the Democrats who want to keep    it in place.  <\/p>\n<p>    But after weeks of debate, there is one clear winner so far:    single-payer health care.  <\/p>\n<p>    No, single-payer isn't going to happen at the end of this    debate or even the end of this year or this decade,    necessarily. But the logical foundations for it are being laid    in our political debate just about every single day. And when    you pair that with the rising public support for government-run    health care, it's clear in which direction this    wholedebate is trending.  <\/p>\n<p>    The most surprising aspect of the current health-care debate,    for me, has been how Republicans have essentially     given up on making the conservative case for their bills.    They aren't even arguing that the free market would lead to    higher-quality care, efficiency and medical advancements, as    the GOP of old might have. Instead, they are     trying to obscure the reality that their bills would cut    Medicaid by hundreds of millions of dollars (versus where    funding is currently set) and would increase the number of    uninsured Americans by potential 20 million or more.  <\/p>\n<p>    Part of this is because that's a losing argument. The reality    of entitlement programs and government benefits is that, once    they are instituted, it's very, very difficult to get rid of    them or even scale them back. Just look at what happened to the    GOP when it suggested privatizing Social Security last decade.  <\/p>\n<p>    That political reality has also basically forced Republicans to    concede this point: that people being uninsured is a very bad    thing, and that cutting funding to Medicaid is a bad thing.    They have basically conceded that government involvement in    health care is a good thing or, at least, a necessary    thing. That wasn't the argument they were making against    Obamacare eight years ago.  <\/p>\n<p>    Democrats, meanwhile, are gradually talking themselves into    supporting single-payer, it would seem. Their laser-like focus    on the number who are uninsured and the Medicaid cuts has a    logical conclusion. There is only one way to make sure nobody    is uninsured, after all.  <\/p>\n<p>    And there are signs that both parties' bases are indeed moving    toward government health care. APew    studyin January showed 60 percent of Americans felt    it was the government's job to guarantee health-care coverage    for all Americans up from 51 percent in early    2016.About 8 in 10 Democratic-leaning voters and 3 in 10    Republican-leaning voters agreed with this statement.  <\/p>\n<p>    That's not quite single-payer, of course, so Pew     broke it out a little bit more in its most recent study. It    asked those who supported a government guarantee whether they    backed single-payer or a mix of government and private    programs. In this case, support for single-payer was 33 percent    overall 52 percent on the Democratic side and 12 percent    on the GOP side.  <\/p>\n<p>    One of the realities of polling, though, is that when you give    people more than two options, they will tend toward the    middle-ground response. A \"mix of government and private    programs\" is a pretty safe middle ground, it would seem, and    may actually undersell single-payer support.  <\/p>\n<p>    And sure enough, a Gallup poll from mid-2016 actually showed        a 58 percent majority of Americans wanteda \"federally    funded healthcare program providing insurance for all    Americans.\" A     CBS News poll in February 2016 asked more directly about    single-payer and found 44 percent support.     NORC pegged it at 38 percent but only 24 percent if    people were told that it would greatly increase government    spending. (Philip    Bump summarized all of these data here.)  <\/p>\n<p>    What we can say with certainty, though, is that the debate over    this topic has taken on a new flavor as Republicans have been    working to finally undo Obamacare. And it's a flavor that    reflects a growing move toward government health care.  <\/p>\n<p>    The GOP may yet move the needle away from government health    care by the time all is said and done, but the center of this    political debate has moved noticeably to the left.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Go here to read the rest:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/the-fix\/wp\/2017\/07\/01\/the-biggest-winner-in-the-current-health-care-debate-single-payer\/\" title=\"The biggest winner in the current health-care debate: Single-payer - Washington Post\">The biggest winner in the current health-care debate: Single-payer - Washington Post<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> We still don't know who will ultimately prevail in the debate over the future of American health care: the Republicans who want to overhaul Obamacare, or the Democrats who want to keep it in place. But after weeks of debate, there is one clear winner so far: single-payer health care.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/health-care\/the-biggest-winner-in-the-current-health-care-debate-single-payer-washington-post.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-224738","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-health-care"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224738"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=224738"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224738\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=224738"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=224738"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=224738"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}