{"id":223213,"date":"2017-06-26T01:05:04","date_gmt":"2017-06-26T05:05:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/bitcoin-miners-are-rejecting-segwit-for-non-technical-reasons-the-merkle.php"},"modified":"2017-06-26T01:05:04","modified_gmt":"2017-06-26T05:05:04","slug":"bitcoin-miners-are-rejecting-segwit-for-non-technical-reasons-the-merkle","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/bitcoin-2\/bitcoin-miners-are-rejecting-segwit-for-non-technical-reasons-the-merkle.php","title":{"rendered":"Bitcoin Miners are Rejecting Segwit For Non-Technical Reasons &#8211; The Merkle"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    It has become evident that miners are not opposed to    the Bitcoin Core development teams transaction malleability    fix Segregated Witness (Segwit) given the overwhelming support    towards Segwit2x, a proposal made by Barry Silbert-led Digital    Currency group and 57 other companies that include major mining    pool operators such as Bitmain.  <\/p>\n<p>    The hashrate signaling the activation of Segwit2x is    currently over 90 percent at the time of writing. The proposal    entails the activation of Segwit at an 80 percent activation    threshold by September and the execution of a 2MB block size    increase hard fork six months thereafter. The key component of    the proposal is the activation of Segwit and given the 90    percent support from miners, it is quite clear that miners are    in favor of activating Segwit.  <\/p>\n<p>    One condition requested by the miners is the execution of    a 2MB block size increase hard fork which derived from the Hong    Kong scaling agreement that was established in February of    2016. The majority of miners believe that the expected 75    percent optimization of block size through the activation of    Segwit and additional scaling via second layer payment channels    such as Lightning are not sufficient to address the explosive    growth of the bitcoin industry and user base.  <\/p>\n<p>    Yet, the rapidly increasing support towards Segwit2x has    proven to the industry and community that miners are not    opposed to Segwit for technical reasons. In fact, a major    mining pool operator ViaBTC, recently stated:  <\/p>\n<p>      The main reason to refuse Segwit is because the      roadmap of bitcoin core, not the technical detail.    <\/p>\n<p>    The development team behind ViaBTC revealed that the    company along with many China-based mining companies such as    Bitmains Antpool have been opposed to Segwit due to their    rejection of the Bitcoin Core development teams roadmap. In    particular, ViaBTC wrote in a blog post earlier this year that    it does not approve Bitcoin Cores roadmap of utilizing Segwit    as a scaling solution.  <\/p>\n<p>      Segwit, which is a soft fork solution for      malleability, cannot solve the capacity problem. From Core      members public statements, they didnt attach necessary      importance on this issue. Even if Segwit after activation can      slightly scale up block size with new transaction formats,      its still far behind the demand for the development of      Bitcoin network, wrote the ViaBTC development team.    <\/p>\n<p>    However, one of the solutions offered by Segwit is the    infrastructure for two layer solutions such as Lightning which    are expected to open doors for a wide range of services and    applications that can operate on top of bitcoin and most    importantly, significantly lower transaction fees through the    usage of payment channels.  <\/p>\n<p>    Similar to the viewpoint of Bitmain, ViaBTC claimed that    the implementation of Lightning and payment channels will lead    to centralization of transactions by deviating from direct    on-chain peer to peer transactions to payment channel-based    transactions.  <\/p>\n<p>    To this date, Bitcoin Core, the industry and community    have been straightforward with the scaling roadmap. Activate    Segwit to strengthen security measures by eliminating    transaction malleability and providing better infrastructure    for hardware wallets and establish a working platform for two    layer solutions for long-term scalability.  <\/p>\n<p>    The scaling debate has started to see some progress as    miners agreed to activate Segwit given a condition to increase    the block size by 2MB. Given that the mining community is    opposed to the sole activation of Segwit due to non-technical    reasons, over the next few weeks, the bitcoin industry is    likely to see major progress with scaling.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more from the original source: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/themerkle.com\/bitcoin-miners-are-rejecting-segwit-for-non-technical-reasons\/\" title=\"Bitcoin Miners are Rejecting Segwit For Non-Technical Reasons - The Merkle\">Bitcoin Miners are Rejecting Segwit For Non-Technical Reasons - The Merkle<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> It has become evident that miners are not opposed to the Bitcoin Core development teams transaction malleability fix Segregated Witness (Segwit) given the overwhelming support towards Segwit2x, a proposal made by Barry Silbert-led Digital Currency group and 57 other companies that include major mining pool operators such as Bitmain. The hashrate signaling the activation of Segwit2x is currently over 90 percent at the time of writing. The proposal entails the activation of Segwit at an 80 percent activation threshold by September and the execution of a 2MB block size increase hard fork six months thereafter <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/bitcoin-2\/bitcoin-miners-are-rejecting-segwit-for-non-technical-reasons-the-merkle.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[261455],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-223213","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bitcoin-2"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223213"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=223213"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223213\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=223213"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=223213"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=223213"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}