PIERRE | The people participating on South Dakotas health-care solutions coalition are trying to accomplish good. <\/p>\n
They are searching for ways to shift responsibility for the cost of health care. <\/p>\n
Ideally, the federal government would pay millions of dollars more for Indian health services. State government then could compensate Medicaid providers at higher rates. <\/p>\n
Would the citizens of our state see any relief? I wonder too about federal debt. <\/p>\n
That black hole grows deeper and deeper, day after day. Its like a credit card. You can charge and charge some more. Until the card is maxed out and youre finally broke. Then what? <\/p>\n
Right now, South Dakota is looking to follow Wyomings lead. Wyoming is arranging a system that would share savings. <\/p>\n
Whatever amount Wyomings state government can shave from Medicaid spending for American Indians would be partially shared with tribal health programs. <\/p>\n
Wyoming wants to bring its state spending into line. <\/p>\n
But Wyomings plan relies, too, on shifting more responsibility for care for American Indians to the federal government. <\/p>\n
You can argue that health care is a right. But then you might have to argue about who pays for the care. <\/p>\n
The federal Indian Health Service is responsible, but Medicaid kicks in when IHS-eligible people are referred outside IHS. State and federal governments split Medicaid. <\/p>\n
The headlines in recent weeks tell us several things. <\/p>\n
They say that many of the Republicans who currently run Congress and rule the Oval Office want to repeal Obamacare. They also say that millions of people would lose health insurance without a solid replacement. <\/p>\n
I dont know which side would win a national vote. <\/p>\n
I do know from earlier times in my life what its like without any health insurance. And I know, from help we gave to our parents, what its like to face bills beyond what most people can pay. <\/p>\n
Then there is the role of money for research. <\/p>\n
We have three large at least for South Dakota providers of health care that arent government agencies. They receive donations and grants for research. <\/p>\n
The work is admirable. Its also a black hole for governments. The research revenue disappears, protected from state and federal taxes. <\/p>\n
Gov. Dennis Daugaard commissioned a study while President Barack Obama was still in the White House. <\/p>\n
Daugaard wanted to know whether South Dakota could afford to expand Medicaid, so that low-income working people would be covered. <\/p>\n
The study changed the Republican governors mind. He seemed ready to recommend pursuing the idea that the Democratic president had offered to state governments. <\/p>\n
Then many Republican legislators made clear they didnt support expansion. That probably wont change. The coalition though keeps searching for ways to still get there. <\/p>\n
I dont see the political climate for that right now, Sen. Deb Soholt, R-Sioux Falls, said Tuesday about expansion of Medicaid at a coalition meeting. <\/p>\n
Shes a member. So is Rep. Jean Hunhoff, R-Yankton. <\/p>\n
Youve got to have the money to be able to do it, Hunhoff said. <\/p>\n
Right now we dont. It is unlikely a deeply conservative state ever will. <\/p>\n
Bob Mercer is the state capitol correspondent for the Rapid City Journal. He can be reached by emailing bobmercer2014@gmail.com<\/a>. <\/p>\n <\/p>\n Go here to read the rest:<\/p>\n MERCER: Solving the health-care puzzle - Rapid City Journal<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" PIERRE | The people participating on South Dakotas health-care solutions coalition are trying to accomplish good. They are searching for ways to shift responsibility for the cost of health care. Ideally, the federal government would pay millions of dollars more for Indian health services. Continue reading