{"id":220010,"date":"2017-06-16T03:23:31","date_gmt":"2017-06-16T07:23:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/vitamin-labels-are-wrong-and-will-be-for-years-huffpost.php"},"modified":"2017-06-16T03:23:31","modified_gmt":"2017-06-16T07:23:31","slug":"vitamin-labels-are-wrong-and-will-be-for-years-huffpost","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/food-supplements\/vitamin-labels-are-wrong-and-will-be-for-years-huffpost.php","title":{"rendered":"Vitamin Labels Are Wrong and Will Be for Years! &#8211; HuffPost"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      The government knows it, and the supplement industry knows      it. But those who use vitamins every day probably dont know      that the label on every multivitamin and most other vitamin      and mineral supplements  such as vitamin D, calcium, and B      complexes -- is wrong and misleading.    <\/p>\n<p>      Last July, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)      updated decades-old Daily Values (DVs) which are meant to      tell you how much of the daily requirement of specific      nutrients is provided by a food or supplement. Some of these      changes were minor and some were major. Daily Values were      raised for eight nutrients and lowered for twelve. A summary of these changes was published at      the time by ConsumerLab.com (of which I am President).    <\/p>\n<p>      Updating the DVs was a good idea. The problem is that they      are not yet on labels. Large supplement companies were given      two years -- until July 2018 -- to change their labels to      reflect these new DVs, and smaller firms were given three      years. Thats a long time to wait to get correct information.      And things just got worse: Two days ago, the FDA quietly      added a note to its website indicating      that the implementation is being delayed in a ... desire to      give industry more time and decrease costs, balanced with the      importance of minimizing the transition period during which      consumers will see both the old and the new versions of the      label in the marketplace. Now we dont know when labels will      be corrected.    <\/p>\n<p>      The delay is actually driven largely by requests by the food      industry, which asked to extend the deadline as 2021 because      the new supplement labeling is part of broader revisions to      food labels which include the disclosure of amounts of added      sugar in products. Before his appointment, the new FDA      Commissioner, Dr. Scott Gottlieb, indicated his willingness to extend the      deadline.    <\/p>\n<p>      It may be a very long time before youre able to rely on the      label to tell you if youre taking too much or too little of      a vitamin or mineral, so its time to make sure you      understand your requirements and whats really being promised      by products (let alone whether they actually contain these      amounts  an issue ConsumerLab has been tackling through      independent testing since 1999). To help you, be aware that      you can quickly check the new DVs, as well as the RDAs, at      <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ConsumerLab.com\/RDAs\" rel=\"nofollow\">http:\/\/www.ConsumerLab.com\/RDAs<\/a>. In addition,      ConsumerLab.com has calculated the correct new Daily Values      for many popular Multivitamins and B Vitamins in its reports on those      supplements, pointing out those which exceed upper tolerable      intake levels.    <\/p>\n<p>      You should also pay particular attention to the amounts of      vitamin D and folate in supplements, as current labels are      way out-of-whack in providing proper guidance.    <\/p>\n<p>      Previously, the DV for vitamin D was set at 400 International      Units (IU) for everyone. The new DV (which you wont see on      labels) is twice that: 800 IU. Bare in mind that the DVs are      a one-size-fits-all system based on the highest Recommended      Daily Allowances (or RDAs, which are set by the independent      Institute of Medicine) across a population. For example, the      RDA for vitamin D is 400 IU during infancy, 600 IU to age 70,      and 800 IU over age 70. So if your vitamin claims to provide      100% of the DV for vitamin D, for anyone other than infants      it actually provides only 50% to 67% of the daily      requirement. (Keep in mind that many people who are not      deficient in vitamin D already take too much, such as 5,000      IU daily, and this may reverse the benefits of vitamin D, as      noted in my HuffPost post Dont Fall for Vitamin D.    <\/p>\n<p>      One of the major changes and improvements in the Daily Values      relates to folate: a B vitamin found in green leafy      vegetables, such as spinach. Folate plays a critical role in      cell division, and adequate intake can reduce the risk of      heart disease and of developing certain cancers. However,      most supplements provide folate in the form of the synthetic      compound folic acid  and getting too much folic acid can      have negative effects.    <\/p>\n<p>      While the old DVs counted folic acid as equivalent to folate,      the new DVs recognize that folic acid is absorbed better than      folate and actually counts 70% more. As a result, a      supplement which provides 400 micrograms (mcg) of folic acid      and currently shows this as 100% DV would, more accurately      under the new DVs, show this same amount of folic acid as      680 mcg of dietary folate equivalents and 170% of the DV.      This becomes particularly important with supplements that      contain higher amounts of folic acid, many of which      (including most prenatal supplements) provide 800 mcg of      folic acid. There is no good reason for such a high amount      and, according to the new DVs, this is actually 1,360 mcg of      folate  360 mcg above the upper tolerable limit of 1,000 mcg      per day. On top of this, manufacturers often add extra folic      acid to be sure youre getting the full amount listed on the      label until the expiration date. With the current labels,      what you think is helping you may be hurting you.    <\/p>\n<p>      Once companies are required to apply the new DVs in their      labels, they will likely reduce the amounts of folic acid in      supplements. That will be good for the consumer, as most of      us already get close to the daily requirement of folate from      our diets) without causing harm. (Note: Pregnant women and      those of child-bearing age should still look to get 400 mcg      of folic acid from a supplement each day, in addition to      getting folate from their diets, as this may reduce the risk      of birth defects).    <\/p>\n<p>      Supplements have commonly been considered buyer beware      products. The new DVs represent an opportunity to reduce this      caution. By dragging its feet on getting the new DVs on      labels, the FDA is endangering the consumer and further      tarnishing the reputation of the supplement industry. Thats      not good for anyone.    <\/p>\n<p>  Wake up to the day's most important news.<\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>More: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/entry\/vitamin-labels-are-wrong-and-will-be-for-years_us_594350dae4b0940f84fe2d43\" title=\"Vitamin Labels Are Wrong and Will Be for Years! - HuffPost\">Vitamin Labels Are Wrong and Will Be for Years! - HuffPost<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The government knows it, and the supplement industry knows it. But those who use vitamins every day probably dont know that the label on every multivitamin and most other vitamin and mineral supplements such as vitamin D, calcium, and B complexes -- is wrong and misleading.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/food-supplements\/vitamin-labels-are-wrong-and-will-be-for-years-huffpost.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[431586],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-220010","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-food-supplements"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220010"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=220010"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220010\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=220010"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=220010"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=220010"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}