{"id":213722,"date":"2017-03-07T05:47:24","date_gmt":"2017-03-07T10:47:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/update-house-gop-releases-bill-replacing-obama-health-care-overhaul-nwitimes-com.php"},"modified":"2017-03-07T05:47:24","modified_gmt":"2017-03-07T10:47:24","slug":"update-house-gop-releases-bill-replacing-obama-health-care-overhaul-nwitimes-com","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/health-care\/update-house-gop-releases-bill-replacing-obama-health-care-overhaul-nwitimes-com.php","title":{"rendered":"UPDATE: House GOP releases bill replacing Obama health care overhaul &#8211; nwitimes.com"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      WASHINGTON  House Republicans on Monday released their      long-awaited plan for unraveling former President Barack      Obama's health care law, a package that would scale back the      government's role in health care and likely leave more      Americans uninsured.    <\/p>\n<p>      House committees planned to begin voting on the 123-page      legislation Wednesday, launching what could be the year's      defining battle in Congress and capping a seven-year      Republican effort to repeal the 2010 law. Though GOP leaders      expect their measure to win the backing of the Trump      administration, divisions remain and GOP success is by no      means ensured.    <\/p>\n<p>      The plan would repeal the statute's unpopular fines on people      who don't carry health insurance. It would replace      income-based subsidies the law provides to help millions of      Americans pay premiums with age-based tax credits that may be      less generous to people with low incomes. Those payments      would phase out for higher-earning people.    <\/p>\n<p>      The bill would continue Obama's expansion of Medicaid to      additional low-earning Americans until 2020. After that,      states adding Medicaid recipients would no longer receive the      additional federal funds the statute has provided.    <\/p>\n<p>      More significantly, Republicans would overhaul the      federal-state Medicaid program, changing its open-ended      federal financing to a limit based on enrollment and costs in      each state.    <\/p>\n<p>      In perhaps their riskiest political gamble, the plan is      expected to cover fewer than the 20 million people insured      under Obama's overhaul, including many residents of states      carried by President Donald Trump in November's election.    <\/p>\n<p>      Republicans said they don't have official estimates on those      figures yet. But aides from both parties and nonpartisan      analysts have said they expect coverage numbers to be lower.    <\/p>\n<p>      House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said the bill would \"drive      down costs, encourage competition, and give every American      access to quality, affordable health insurance.\" He added,      \"This unified Republican government will deliver relief and      peace of mind to the millions of Americans suffering under      Obamacare.\"    <\/p>\n<p>      But besides solid opposition from Democrats, there were      signals galore that Republican leaders faced problems within      their own party, including from conservatives complaining      that the measure isn't aggressive enough in repealing parts      of Obama's law.    <\/p>\n<p>      \"It still looks like Obamacare-lite to me,\" said Sen. Rand      Paul, R-Ky., among three Senate conservatives who have      criticized the emerging GOP bill. \"It's going to have to be      better.\"    <\/p>\n<p>      The Republican tax credits  ranging from $2,000 to $14,000      for families  would be refundable, meaning even people with      no tax liability would receive the payments. Conservatives      have objected that that feature creates a new entitlement      program the government cannot afford.    <\/p>\n<p>      Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch, R-Utah,      wouldn't rule out changes in the measure by his chamber,      where significant numbers of moderate Republicans have      expressed concerns that the measure could leave too many      voters without coverage.    <\/p>\n<p>      \"The House has the right to come up with what it wants to and      present it to the Senate by passing it. And we have a right      to look it over and see if we like it or don't,\" Hatch told      reporters.    <\/p>\n<p>      Underscoring those worries, four GOP senators released a      letter to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.,      shortly before the bill was unveiled.    <\/p>\n<p>      They complained that an earlier, similar draft of the measure      \"does not provide stability and certainty for individuals and      families in Medicaid expansion programs or the necessary      flexibility for states.\" Signing the letter were Sens. Rob      Portman of Ohio, Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, Cory      Gardner of Colorado and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska.    <\/p>\n<p>      Thirty-one states and the District of Columbia opted to      expand Medicaid coverage under the law and accept beefed-up      federal spending for the program. Around half those states      have GOP governors, who are largely reluctant to see that      spending curtailed.    <\/p>\n<p>      In another feature that could alienate moderate Republicans,      the measure would block for one year federal payments to      Planned Parenthood, the women's health organization long      opposed by many in the party because it provides abortions.      It also forbids people receiving tax credits to help pay      premiums to buy coverage under a plan that provides      abortions.    <\/p>\n<p>      Republicans said they'd not yet received official cost      estimates on the overall bill from the nonpartisan      Congressional Budget Office. That office's projections on the      bill's price tag and the number of people the measure would      cover could be key in winning over recalcitrant Republicans,      or making them even harder to win over.    <\/p>\n<p>      A series of tax increases on higher-earning people, the      insurance industry and others used to finance the Obama      overhaul's coverage expansion would be repealed as of 2018.    <\/p>\n<p>      In a last-minute change to satisfy conservative lawmakers,      business and unions, Republicans dropped a plan pushed by      Ryan to impose a first-ever tax on the most generous      employer-provided health plans.    <\/p>\n<p>      Popular consumer protections in the Obama law would be      retained, such as insurance safeguards for people with      pre-existing medical problems, and parents' ability to keep      young adult children on their insurance until age 26.    <\/p>\n<p>      Associated Press writers Mary Clare Jalonick and Andrew      Taylor contributed to this report.    <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nwitimes.com\/business\/healthcare\/update-house-gop-releases-bill-replacing-obama-health-care-overhaul\/article_555cdcdd-40ab-5342-a6d5-d83e40f73bea.html\" title=\"UPDATE: House GOP releases bill replacing Obama health care overhaul - nwitimes.com\">UPDATE: House GOP releases bill replacing Obama health care overhaul - nwitimes.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> WASHINGTON House Republicans on Monday released their long-awaited plan for unraveling former President Barack Obama's health care law, a package that would scale back the government's role in health care and likely leave more Americans uninsured. House committees planned to begin voting on the 123-page legislation Wednesday, launching what could be the year's defining battle in Congress and capping a seven-year Republican effort to repeal the 2010 law. Though GOP leaders expect their measure to win the backing of the Trump administration, divisions remain and GOP success is by no means ensured <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/health-care\/update-house-gop-releases-bill-replacing-obama-health-care-overhaul-nwitimes-com.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-213722","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-health-care"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213722"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=213722"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/213722\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=213722"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=213722"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=213722"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}