{"id":212860,"date":"2017-03-03T19:52:42","date_gmt":"2017-03-04T00:52:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/gorsuch-successfully-balances-criminal-law-personal-liberty-the-hill-blog.php"},"modified":"2017-03-03T19:52:42","modified_gmt":"2017-03-04T00:52:42","slug":"gorsuch-successfully-balances-criminal-law-personal-liberty-the-hill-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/liberty\/gorsuch-successfully-balances-criminal-law-personal-liberty-the-hill-blog.php","title":{"rendered":"Gorsuch successfully balances criminal law, personal liberty &#8211; The Hill (blog)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Many positive things have been and will be said about Judge    Neil Gorsuch    leading up to his confirmation. Deservedly so. There is a lot    to like about him, including his intellect and commitment to    textualism.  <\/p>\n<p>    But some have wondered: If Judge Gorsuch is confirmed as    Justice Antonin Scalias    successor, would he change the arc of the Supreme Courts    decisions on criminal law and procedure, issues critical to a    prosecutorial office like my own?  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    Justice Scalia recognized that some of the governments most    consequential powers are those it brings to bear in the    criminal justice system. We rightly count on the state to    protect us from criminals and to appropriately mete out justice    for broken laws.  <\/p>\n<p>    If the state failed to fulfill those functions, anarchy would    reign. But the governments powers to investigate crime and to    charge defendants can result in serious intrusions on    individual liberty. And, unchecked, government-sponsored loss    of liberty leads to tyranny.  <\/p>\n<p>    Those tensions caused the Founders to limit the governments    criminal-justice powers through structural safeguards enshrined    in the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments. Good judges defend    those safeguards, insisting that the government honor them    while enforcing the law.  <\/p>\n<p>      Ginsburg: Trump Supreme Court nominee \"very easy to get along      with\" <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/p7BhgqhcbE\" rel=\"nofollow\">https:\/\/t.co\/p7BhgqhcbE<\/a>      pic.twitter.com\/uYvcEuor53    <\/p>\n<p>    Justice Scalia and Judge Gorsuch both fit that mold. To show    their similarities, consider these four excerpts, two from each    judges criminal-law opinions. Before jumping to the answers    below, can you identify each passages author?  <\/p>\n<p>    1. Instead of setting forth exact limits of    the governments search and seizure powers in some numbingly    detailed (and no doubt quickly antiquated) list of dos and    donts, the framers of the Fourth Amendment more simply and    ingeniously forbade all unreasonable searches and seizures.  <\/p>\n<p>    2. Drunken driving is a serious matter, but    so is the loss of our freedom to come and go as we please    without police interference. To prevent and detect murder we do    not allow searches without probable cause or targeted    [investigatory] stops without reasonable suspicion. We should    not do so for drunken driving either.  <\/p>\n<p>    3. The Fourth Amendments protection of the    home has never been tied to measurement of the quality or    quantity of information obtained.  <\/p>\n<p>    4. Since time out of mind the law has    prevented agents from exercising powers their principals do not    possess and so cannot delegate. That is a rule of law the    founders knew, understood, and undoubtedly relied upon when    they drafted the Fourth Amendment  for what would have been    the point of the Amendment if the government could have    instantly rendered it a dead letter by the simple expedient of    delegating to agents investigative work it was forbidden from    undertaking itself?  <\/p>\n<p>    For those keeping score, the authors are (1) Gorsuch    (dissenting in United States v. Nicholson), (2) Scalia    (dissenting in Navarette v. California), (3) Scalia (in    Kyllo v. United States), and (4) Gorsuch    (in United States v. Ackerman).  <\/p>\n<p>    So Americans of all political stripes need look no further than    Judge Gorsuchs own words to reassure themselves that he    strives to strike the same careful balance as Justice Scalia on    critical criminal-law issues. We can count on him, as Justice    Gorsuch, to join opinions reminding prosecutors that their duty    in a criminal case  for the good of all Americans  is not    that they shall win a case, but that justice shall be done.  <\/p>\n<p>    Sean D. Reyes is the Attorney General of Utah.  <\/p>\n<p>    The views of contributors are their own and not the views    of The Hill.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/blogs\/pundits-blog\/the-judiciary\/322197-for-law-enforcement-gorsuch-successfully-balances-criminal\" title=\"Gorsuch successfully balances criminal law, personal liberty - The Hill (blog)\">Gorsuch successfully balances criminal law, personal liberty - The Hill (blog)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Many positive things have been and will be said about Judge Neil Gorsuch leading up to his confirmation. Deservedly so. There is a lot to like about him, including his intellect and commitment to textualism.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/liberty\/gorsuch-successfully-balances-criminal-law-personal-liberty-the-hill-blog.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-212860","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-liberty"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212860"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212860"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212860\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212860"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212860"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212860"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}